Key Features for Ignition Interlock Programs

This report describes an effort to document alcohol ignition interlock programs in the United States in order to highlight those programs or program features that are believed to be best able to serve traffic safety interests. Information has been gathered on important interlock program features together with some recommendations for States to consider as programs are developed. This publication reflects information of the time it was written. Therefore, some statements may be outdated. In addition to the literature search and telephone conversations with State experts identified by Governors Highway Safety Representatives, wide ranging commentary was provided by key informants during a parallel effort to document interlock program features undertaken by the Interlock Working Group (IWG) of the International Council of Alcohol Drugs and Traffic Safety (ICADTS). All the above sources of information were compiled into a preliminary report in order to frame the discussion for an expert panel meeting. This final report represents the views of the authors, but also reflects input from panelists, written commentary to the IWG, and documented, published sources. The general topics of this report include the following: program enrollment issues; interlock program ramp-up and expansion; standardization of reporting and information flow; program compliance, noncompliance and interlock removal; linkages to treatment; differences in court-based judicial programs and motor vehicle administered interlock programs; and suggested core elements of interlock programs. The authors believe that the single major difference among panelists centered on whether interlocks should play a role in the monitoring of court-ordered alcohol abstinence. This final report will be useful to anyone concerned about interlock implementation and traffic safety.

[1]  A. Mcknight,et al.  THE EFFECT OF LICENSE SUSPENSION UPON DWI RECIDIVISM , 1991 .

[2]  J. Blatt,et al.  Residence location of drivers involved in fatal crashes. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  P R Marques,et al.  Behavioral monitoring of DUI offenders with the Alcohol Ignition Interlock Recorder. , 1999, Addiction.

[4]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Attitudes Toward In-Vehicle Advanced Alcohol Detection Technology , 2010, Traffic injury prevention.

[5]  A Scott Tippetts,et al.  Comparative and joint prediction of DUI recidivism from alcohol ignition interlock and driver records. , 2003, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[6]  A Scott Tippetts,et al.  Evaluation of a program to motivate impaired driving offenders to install ignition interlocks. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. , 1997, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[8]  Scott V. Masten,et al.  An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Ignition Interlock in California , 2004 .

[9]  L. Schmidt,et al.  Who goes to alcohol and drug treatment? Understanding utilization within the context of insurance. , 2002, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[10]  R. Bangert-Drowns,et al.  Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders. , 1995, Addiction.

[11]  Scott Tippetts,et al.  Estimating Driver Risk Using Alcohol Biomarkers , Interlock BAC Tests and Psychometric Assessments : Initial Descriptives , 2011 .

[12]  A Scott Tippetts,et al.  The Alcohol Interlock: An Underutilized Resource for Predicting and Controlling Drunk Drivers , 2003, Traffic Injury Prevention.

[13]  J. P. Shalloo Crime in the United States , 1974 .

[14]  Richard Roth,et al.  A note on the effectiveness of the house-arrest alternative for motivating DWI offenders to install ignition interlocks. , 2009, Journal of safety research.

[15]  Scott Tippetts,et al.  Estimating driver risk using alcohol biomarkers, interlock blood alcohol concentration tests and psychometric assessments: initial descriptives. , 2010, Addiction.

[16]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Alcohol ignition interlock programmes for reducing drink driving recidivism. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[17]  P. Lejins Uniform Crime Reports , 1966 .

[18]  P R Marques,et al.  The Alberta Interlock Program: the evaluation of a province-wide program on DUI recidivism. , 1999, Addiction.

[19]  G. Larkin,et al.  Effectiveness of ignition interlock devices in reducing drunk driving recidivism. , 1999, American journal of preventive medicine.

[20]  Richard Roth,et al.  Interlocks for First Offenders: Effective? , 2007, Traffic injury prevention.

[21]  Daniel Coleman Crime in the United States, 2005 , 2007 .

[22]  T. Miller,et al.  Cost-outcome analysis in injury prevention and control: eighty-four recent estimates for the United States. , 2000, Medical care.

[23]  Robert B. Voas,et al.  Evaluation of the New Mexico Ignition Interlock Program , 2010 .

[24]  P R Marques,et al.  Predicting repeat DUI offenses with the alcohol interlock recorder. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.