Framework for Analysis of the Workload of Training Captains

Low-cost carrier (LCC) airlines that fly short-haul and medium-haul routes have grown rapidly in Europe in recent years. LCCs achieve a low-cost structure by maximizing aircraft use and streamlining crew scheduling, for example, by flying one type of aircraft and limiting overnight stops. A potential corollary of intensive crew use is elevated levels of crew workload and fatigue, which, if not managed effectively, can increase the likelihood of adverse safety outcomes. Training captains are a subgroup of the pilot population for whom workload may be particularly problematic. These pilots fly standard duties as well as performing a range of training and assessment duties. This is believed to be the first attempt to present a methodology to analyze the factors affecting training captains’ workload with the objective of assisting airlines in managing workload more efficiently. For 15 duties, 29 training captains from a LCC completed workbooks that collected information on duty type, work schedule, personal characteristics, and sleep, together with perceived workload and alertness ratings. The linear mixed model was used to analyze the data. The main finding was that after controlling for scheduling variables, personal characteristics, and sleep duration, workload varied systematically across the different duty types. Training captains training in the simulator and training while flying had a higher workload strain than standard flying duties, with simulator training duties associated with the highest workload. The results are used to make recommendations on how workload can be managed in an airline.

[1]  Susana Rubio,et al.  Evaluation of Subjective Mental Workload: A Comparison of SWAT, NASA‐TLX, and Workload Profile Methods , 2004 .

[2]  Joseph T. Coyne,et al.  MENTAL WORKLOAD AS A FUNCTION OF TRAFFIC DENSITY: COMPARISON OF PHYSIOLOGICAL, BEHAVIORAL, AND SUBJECTIVE INDICES , 2005 .

[3]  A. Coblentz,et al.  Perceived fatigue for short- and long-haul flights: a survey of 739 airline pilots. , 2003, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[4]  André Dittmar,et al.  Mental workload in air traffic control: an index constructed from field tests. , 2004, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[5]  Glenn F. Wilson,et al.  An Analysis of Mental Workload in Pilots During Flight Using Multiple Psychophysiological Measures , 2002 .

[6]  Brian Hilburn,et al.  COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY IN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL: A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2004 .

[7]  J. Annett Subjective rating scales: science or art? , 2002, Ergonomics.

[8]  Matthew B Weinger,et al.  Multiple Measures of Anesthesia Workload During Teaching and Nonteaching Cases , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[9]  So Young Sohn,et al.  A study on the student pilot's mental workload due to personality types of both instructor and student , 2003, Ergonomics.

[10]  R. Goonetilleke,et al.  Simplified subjective workload assessment technique , 2001, Ergonomics.

[11]  Jin-Ru Yen,et al.  Identifying flight fatigue factors: An econometric modeling approach , 2005 .

[12]  Jeffrey H Goode,et al.  Are pilots at risk of accidents due to fatigue? , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[13]  Simon Bennett Flight crew stress and fatigue in low-cost commercial air operations - an appraisal , 2003 .

[14]  J. Caldwell Fatigue in aviation. , 2005, Travel medicine and infectious disease.

[15]  Tecnología do ar e espaço European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation , 2010 .

[16]  Maurice G. Kendall,et al.  The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 3: Design and Analysis, and Time- Series. 3rd Edn. , 1976 .