Road Vehicle Modeling Requirements for Optimization of Ride and Handling

The design process of road vehicles, very often based on intuition and experience, can be greatly enhanced through the use of generalized optimization techniques. A methodology based on the use flexible multibody models for the ride and stability optimization of vehicles is proposed here. This procedure allows the use of complex shaped deformable bodies, represented by finite elements, while the gross rigid body motion is captured using co-rotational frames. Rigid bodies represent almost undeformable system components. The methodology proposed is exemplified through the application to a road vehicle with flexible chassis, described as a flexible multibody system. The vehicle optimum design is achieved through the use of an algorithm with finite differences sensitivities, included in a general-purpose package. The vehicle components characteristics are the design variables while constraints on their relative motion and limiting values are imposed. The major difference between the analysis models used for vehicle ride and for handling lies in the description of the tires and road. For comfort improvement the road model is profiled, i.e., it simply contains the information on its height for the left and right side of the wheel sets independently. No lateral forces are specified for the tire road interaction and the tire model only includes the radial deformations. The handling analysis of the vehicle dynamics requires that a three-dimensional description of the road is provided and that the tire model can handle lateral forces. The ride optimization is achieved by finding the optimum of a ride index that is the outcome of a metric that accounts for the acceleration measured in several key points of the vehicle, weighted according to its importance to the occupant comfort. Simulations with various vehicle speeds and different road profiles and geometries, accounting for diverse ride and handling conditions, are used to exemplify applications of the proposed methods.

[1]  Dong-Hoon Choi,et al.  Min–max dynamic response optimization of mechanical systems using approximate augmented Lagrangian , 1998 .

[2]  D. B. Doan,et al.  Finite Element Modeling Concepts in Multibody Dynamics , 1994 .

[3]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Advanced modelling of flexible multibody systems using virtual bodies , 2002 .

[4]  I. Duff,et al.  Direct Methods for Sparse Matrices , 1987 .

[5]  Paul H. Calamai,et al.  Application of genetic algorithms to the design optimization of an active vehicle suspension system , 1998 .

[6]  A. Shabana,et al.  A Coordinate Reduction Technique for Dynamic Analysis of Spatial Substructures with Large Angular Rotations , 1983 .

[7]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Complex Flexible Multibody Systems with Application to Vehicle Dynamics , 2001 .

[8]  G. R. Allen,et al.  Ride quality and international standard ISO 2631 (Guide for the evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration) , 1975 .

[9]  Robin S. Sharp,et al.  Shear Force Development by Pneumatic Tyres in Steady State Conditions: A Review of Modelling Aspects , 1991 .

[10]  J. S. Arora,et al.  Dynamic Response Optimization of Mechanical Systems With Multiplier Methods , 1989 .

[11]  M. S. Pereira,et al.  Dynamic analysis of spatial flexible multibody systems using joint co‐ordinates , 1991 .

[12]  van Dh Dick Campen,et al.  Optimization of Multibody Systems Using Approximation Concepts , 1996 .

[13]  Edward J. Haug,et al.  Applied optimal design: Mechanical and structural systems , 1979 .

[14]  Wan-Suk Yoo,et al.  Dynamics of Flexible Mechanical Systems Using Vibration and Static Correction Modes , 1986 .

[15]  D. Bestle,et al.  Analyzing and Optimizing Multibody Systems , 1992 .

[16]  Werner Schiehlen,et al.  Symbolic computations in multibody systems , 1994 .

[17]  Edward J. Haug,et al.  Design Sensitivity Analysis of Large-Scale Constrained Dynamic Mechanical Systems , 1984 .

[18]  J. Ambrósio,et al.  Elastodynamics of Multibody Systems Using Generalized Inertial Coordinates and Structural Damping , 1997 .

[19]  P. Nikravesh,et al.  Optimal Design of Mechanical Systems With Constraint Violation Stabilization Method , 1985 .

[20]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Handbook of Human Vibration , 1990 .

[21]  Igo Igo Besselink,et al.  Numerical Optimization of the Linear Dynamic Behaviour of Commercial Vehicles , 1994 .

[22]  T D Gillespie,et al.  Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics , 1992 .

[23]  Parviz E. Nikravesh,et al.  An analytical study of pneumatic tyres for vehicle dynamic simulations, part 1: pure slips , 1990 .

[24]  Peter Eberhard,et al.  Multi–Criteria Multi–Model Design Optimization , 1996 .