The effects of mobile phones on pacemaker function.

OBJECTIVES The electromagnetic field generated by different systems have well-recognized adverse effects on pacemaker functions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the adverse effects of mobile phones on pacemaker functions. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 679 patients with permanent pacemakers were enrolled in this study. The study was performed in two steps. Pacemaker lead polarity was unipolar in the first step and bipolar in the second step. Pacemaker sensitivity was first at nominal values, it was then reduced to the minimal value for that pacemaker and tested again. Two mobile phones were symmetrically located on both sides of the pacemaker pocket with the antennas being equidistant at 50, 30, 20 and 10 cm and in close contact with the pocket. The tests were performed when both mobiles were opened, on stand-by, were receiving a call, during the call and were closed. Thirty-seven patients with pacemakers were adversely affected (5.5%) (33 VVI-R pacemakers were converted to asynchronous mode, and 3 were inhibited, 1 DDD-R pacemaker developed ventricular triggering). When the lead polarity was unipolar, the rate of adverse effect was higher when compared to the bipolar state (4.12% and 1.40%, p<0.01). The increase in sensitivity was not an independent factor on the rate of being affected (p>0.05). The rate of observing an adverse effect increased as the pacemaker got older (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Mobile phones might have adverse effects on pacemaker functions under certain conditions. This does not result in any symptoms other than the inhibition of pacemakers, and pacemaker functions return to normal when the mobile phones are removed away from the patient.

[1]  D L Hayes,et al.  Cellular phone interference with external cardiopulmonary monitoring devices. , 2001, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[2]  A. Trigano,et al.  Electromagnetic Interference of External Pacemakers by Walkie‐Talkies and Digital Cellular Phones: Experimental Study , 1999, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[3]  A. Bernstein,et al.  Cardiac pacemakers and cellular telephones. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  B Maisch,et al.  Interactions between Pacemakers and Security Systems , 1998, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[5]  V Barbaro,et al.  Do European GSM Mobile Cellular Phones Pose a Potential Risk to Pacemaker Patients? , 1995, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  Yihong Qiu,et al.  Breath sounds, asthma, and the mobile phone , 2001, The Lancet.

[7]  K. Ellenbogen,et al.  Life after Pacemaker Implantation: Management of Common Problems and Environmental Interactions , 2001, Cardiology in review.

[8]  H Frumkin,et al.  Cellular Phones and Risk of Brain Tumors , 2001, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[9]  Sager Dp,et al.  Current facts on pacemaker electromagnetic interference and their application to clinical care. , 1987 .

[10]  ANDREAS WILKE,et al.  Influence of D‐Net (European GSM‐Standard) Cellular Phones on Pacemaker Function in 50 Patients with Permanent Pacemakers , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[11]  Rebecca A. Steffens,et al.  Interference with cardiac pacemakers by cellular telephones. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  W. Irnich,et al.  Electromagnetic Interference of Pacemakers by Mobile Phones , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[13]  B. Nowak,et al.  Is There a Risk for Interaction Between Mobile Phones and Single Lead VDD Pacemakers? , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[14]  C. Lau,et al.  Interference of cellular phones with implanted permanent pacemakers , 1996, Clinical cardiology.

[15]  L Toivonen,et al.  The Influence of Elevated 50 Hz Electric and Magnetic Fields on Implanted Cardiac Pacemakers: The Role of the Lead Configuration and Programming of the Sensitivity , 1991, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[16]  V Barbaro,et al.  Electromagnetic Interference of Analog Cellular Telephones with Pacemakers , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[17]  BERNARD DODINOT,et al.  Electronic Article Surveillance: A Possible Danger for Pacemaker Patients , 1993, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[18]  Q. Balzano,et al.  Electromagnetic near field interference with implantable medical devices , 1995, Proceedings of International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[19]  HARRY G. MONO,et al.  The Safety of Digital Mobile Cellular Telephones with Minute Ventilation Rate Adaptive Pacemakers , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[20]  M Santini,et al.  Influence of digital and analogue cellular telephones on implanted pacemakers. , 1997, European heart journal.

[21]  F Burkart,et al.  Intermittent pacemaker dysfunction caused by digital mobile telephones. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  D. Sager Current facts on pacemaker electromagnetic interference and their application to clinical care. , 1987, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[23]  W Irnich Mobile Telephones and Pacemakers , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.