Activity organization and knowledge construction during competitive interaction in table tennis

Using a semiological framework and course-of-action theory, this study analyzes the activity of a top-level table tennis player during a match. Recorded data from an international meet was obtained and then supplemented by verbalization data from a post-match interview. The meaningful units that made up the player's course of action were labelled so as to: (a) reconstruct the dynamics of the activity as the match took place, (b) point out how the player's mode of involvement evolved, and (c) determine how knowledge was constructed in action. The player began the match by attempting to discover the particular features of the opponent's play. This was followed by the reproduction of the effective actions just discovered. The player's activity during the match did not consist of applying predefined plans, but included exploration, learning, disguising, and indetermination. The results raise the question of the role of practice and training in producing skillful performance.

[1]  Jacques Theureau,et al.  An analysis of a user's exploration and learning of a multimedia instruction system , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[2]  R. M. Da Silva Neves.  Théories de la psychologie de l'induction , 1994 .

[3]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[4]  D. Norman.  The psychology of everyday things , 1990 .

[5]  D. Farrow,et al.  The effect of video-based perceptual training on the tennis return of serve. , 1998 .

[6]  B. Abernethy.  Visual search strategies and decision-making in sport. , 1991 .

[7]  J. Porac,et al.  Cognition and Communication at Work , 1999 .

[8]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1997 .

[9]  C Alain,et al.  Study of decision-making in squash competition: a computer simulation approach. , 1990, Canadian journal of sport sciences = Journal canadien des sciences du sport.

[10]  Judith E. Rink,et al.  The Effects of a 3-Week Unit of Tactical, Skill or Combined Tactical and Skill Instruction on Badminton Performance of Ninth-Grade Students , 1996 .

[11]  J. Hoc,et al.  Diagnostic et prise de décision dans les situations dynamiques , 1994 .

[12]  J. R. Thomas,et al.  Relation of knowledge and performance in boys' tennis: age and expertise. , 1989, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[13]  J. Lave.  Cognition in practice , 1988 .

[14]  M. Fleury,et al.  Expertise Differences in Preparing to Return a Tennis Serve: A Visual Information Processing Approach , 1989 .

[15]  Jacques Theureau,et al.  La construction de connaissances chez des sportifs de haut niveau lors d'une interaction compétitive , 2002 .

[16]  Peter Werner,et al.  The effects of a 6-week unit of tactical, skill, or combined tactical and skill instruction on badminton performance of ninth-grade students. , 1996 .

[17]  James H. Patton,et al.  Failure to shift following disconfirmation in concept identification. , 1975 .

[18]  R. Singer,et al.  Visual search, anticipation, and reactive comparisons between highly-skilled and beginning tennis players , 1996 .

[19]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[20]  S. McPherson,et al.  The Development of Sport Expertise: Mapping the Tactical Domain , 1994 .

[21]  Robert J. Crutcher,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. , 1993 .

[22]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In The Age Of The Machine , 1993 .

[23]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[24]  J. Lave,et al.  Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context , 1996 .

[25]  J. Austin.  How to do things with words , 1962 .

[26]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[27]  J. Lave.  Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .