Fabrication of layered silica–polysulfone mixed matrix substrate membrane for enhancing performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane

Abstract In order to mitigate the internal concentration polarization (ICP) phenomenon in the forward osmosis (FO) membranes, various strategies have been proposed to modify the substrate membrane layer before a final salt-rejecting active layer is deposited on the substrate membrane surface. One such strategy is the incorporation of nano-particles to produce mixed matrix membrane. However, such modifications on the substrate membranes would likely alter their top surface morphology and this in turn, would profoundly influence the subsequent process of active layer deposition via interfacial polymerization (IP) to form the resultant Thin-Film Composite (TFC) membrane. In the current work, we have comparatively studied the substrate membrane casting processes using a conventional single blade-casting and a facile double-blade co-casting technique for flat-sheet silica–polysulfone mixed matrix substrate membrane fabrication. A series of standardized characterization techniques, including ATR-FTIR, contact angle, zeta potential, pore size distribution, FESEM and EDX have been utilized to characterize the substrate membranes and resultant TFC-FO membranes. The co-casted mixed matrix membranes were demonstrated to have a layered configuration with enhanced structural features to mitigate ICP with the impregnation of nano-sized silica, yet retain an ideal, silica free top surface for the formation of an integral and highly salt-rejecting polyamide active layer. Overall the resultant TFC-FO membranes based on the double-blade casted mixed matrix substrate membranes showed improvement in water flux J v with reduced apparent structural parameter, S values and retained a relatively low reverse salt flux/water flux, J s / J v ratio. With a 1 M NaCl draw solution and DI water feed, the best TFC-FO membranes in the current study achieved a J v of 31.0 LMH and a J s of 7.4 gMH in the active layer-feed solution (AL-FS) orientation, and a J v of 60.5 LMH and a J s of 16.0 gMH in the active layer-draw-solution (AL-DS) orientation. The present study thus substantiated the merits conferred by a layered structure in the mixed matrix substrate membranes and the performance enhancement for the resultant TFC-FO membranes.

[1]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  R. Baker,et al.  Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis , 1981 .

[3]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Modeling of external and internal concentration polarization effect on flux behaviour of forward osmosis , 2008 .

[4]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Double-blade casting technique for optimizing substrate membrane in thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane fabrication , 2014 .

[5]  Masoud Rahimi,et al.  Preparation of a novel antifouling mixed matrix PES membrane by embedding graphene oxide nanoplates , 2014 .

[6]  Yuqing Zhang,et al.  Preparation and characterization of novel Ce-doped nonstoichiometric nanosilica/polysulfone composite membranes , 2008 .

[7]  Zhongyi Jiang,et al.  Improved Antifouling Property of PES Ultrafiltration Membranes Using Additive of Silica−PVP Nanocomposite , 2010 .

[8]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Relating performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes to support layer formation and , 2011 .

[9]  A. Mohammad,et al.  Polymeric membranes incorporated with metal/metal oxide nanoparticles: A comprehensive review , 2013 .

[10]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Water permeability and water/salt selectivity tradeoff in polymers for desalination , 2008 .

[11]  T. He,et al.  Preparation of composite hollow fiber membranes: co-extrusion of hydrophilic coatings onto porous hydrophobic support structures , 2002 .

[12]  Rong Wang,et al.  Factors affecting flux performance of forward osmosis systems , 2012 .

[13]  Jessica D. Schiffman,et al.  Nanofibers in thin-film composite membrane support layers: Enabling expanded application of forward and pressure retarded osmosis , 2013 .

[14]  Rong Wang,et al.  Influence of monomer concentrations on the performance of polyamide-based thin film composite forwar , 2011 .

[15]  Jincai Su,et al.  Sublayer structure and reflection coefficient and their effects on concentration polarization and me , 2011 .

[16]  Rong Wang,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes , 2011 .

[17]  Liyun Yu,et al.  Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on the surface morphology and performance of microporous PES membrane , 2009 .

[18]  N. Widjojo,et al.  A sulfonated polyphenylenesulfone (sPPSU) as the supporting substrate in thin film composite (TFC) membranes with enhanced performance for forward osmosis (FO) , 2013 .

[19]  Peiyi Wu,et al.  Development of novel SiO2–GO nanohybrid/polysulfone membrane with enhanced performance , 2014 .

[20]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Fouling of reverse osmosis membrane by protein (BSA): Effects of pH, calcium, magnesium, ionic strength and temperature , 2008 .

[21]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Nanocomposite substrates for controlling internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis membranes , 2013 .

[22]  Tai-Shung Chung,et al.  Forward osmosis processes: Yesterday, today and tomorrow , 2012 .

[23]  Cong-jie Gao,et al.  Preparation and characterization of PES–SiO2 organic–inorganic composite ultrafiltration membrane for raw water pretreatment , 2011 .

[24]  A. Morin,et al.  Advanced Mesostructured Hybrid Silica−Nafion Membranes for High-Performance PEM Fuel Cell , 2008 .

[25]  T. Matsuura,et al.  MEMBRANE CHARACTERIZATION BY SOLUTE TRANSPORT AND ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY , 1998 .

[26]  Patricia Gorgojo,et al.  Beneath the surface: Influence of supports on thin film composite membranes by interfacial polymerization for organic solvent nanofiltration , 2013 .

[27]  Remko M. Boom,et al.  Microstructures in phase-inversion membranes. Part I. Formation of macrovoids , 1992 .

[28]  Lei Jin,et al.  Synthesis of a novel composite nanofiltration membrane incorporated SiO2 nanoparticles for oily wastewater desalination , 2012 .

[29]  A. Ghosh,et al.  Impacts of support membrane structure and chemistry on polyamide–polysulfone interfacial composite membranes , 2009 .

[30]  A. McHugh,et al.  Dynamics of the phase inversion process , 1992 .

[31]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration , 2010 .

[32]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Modified models to predict flux behavior in forward osmosis in consideration of external and internal concentration polarizations , 2008 .

[33]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[34]  A. Ismail,et al.  Co-casting technique for fabricating dual-layer flat sheet membranes for gas separation , 2011 .

[35]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes , 2010 .

[36]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[37]  S. V. Joshi,et al.  Probing the structural variations of thin film composite RO membranes obtained by coating polyamide over polysulfone membranes of different pore dimensions , 2006 .

[38]  Andrea Achilli,et al.  Standard methodology for evaluating membrane performance in osmotically driven membrane processes , 2013 .

[39]  R. J. Petersen,et al.  Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 1993 .

[40]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of silica gel–polyacrylonitrile mixed matrix forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly , 2014 .

[41]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation , 2006 .

[42]  S. Loeb,et al.  Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane , 1997 .

[43]  Gang Han,et al.  Thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes with novel hydrophilic supports for desalination , 2012 .

[44]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Forward osmosis organic fouling: Effects of organic loading, calcium and membrane orientation , 2013 .

[45]  A. Ismail,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane with hydrophilic nanocomposite support to reduce internal concentration polarization , 2014 .

[46]  Leyuan Shi,et al.  Effect of substrate structure on the performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes , 2011 .

[47]  Linda Zou,et al.  Recent developments in forward osmosis : opportunities and challenges. , 2012 .

[48]  Marcel Mulder,et al.  Basic Principles of Membrane Technology , 1991 .

[49]  M. Khademi,et al.  Influence of various types of silica nanoparticles on permeation properties of polyurethane/silica mixed matrix membranes , 2014 .

[50]  C. C. Pereira Membranes obtained by simultaneous casting of two polymer solutions , 2001 .