Lamb wave–based detection of a controlled disbond in a lap joint

Lap joints are widely used across many critical structures such as aircraft and bridges. Lamb waves have long been proposed to monitor lap joints against defects such as disbonds. However, there are many challenges which must be answered to make use of Lamb wave technology. Frequency selection is often overlooked, and many authors will select a single frequency without knowing if other frequencies will result in better sensitivity. Another challenge is the features (mode conversion, attenuation, reflection) associated with damage are also inherent in a lap joint. This sharing of features can lead to confusion (false positive/negative) depending on the chosen damage detection strategy. Furthermore, almost all proposed methods require a baseline reading of the structure in its flawless state. Relying on a baseline reading can result in false positives due to shifts in sensor outputs caused by ageing and inconsistent environmental conditions. Instead of a baseline, this article proposes a technique which uses strategically positioned sensors to detect Lamb wave modes generated only in the presence of a disbond. The technique is first developed using a numerical study and then verified with an experimental study. Several frequencies are trialled and detailed in this article which shed light on the ideal frequency selection when using this method.

[1]  Andrei Kotousov,et al.  Surface Strain Measurements Using a 3D Scanning Laser Vibrometer , 2012 .

[2]  N. Rajic,et al.  Adhesive material property evaluation for improved Lamb wave simulation , 2016 .

[3]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Review of guided-wave structural health monitoring , 2007 .

[4]  Wing Kong Chiu,et al.  Three-Dimensional Laser Scanning Vibrometry as a Visualisation Tool for Structural Health Monitoring Research , 2013 .

[5]  F. Chang,et al.  Adhesive Layer Effects on PZT-induced Lamb Waves at Elevated Temperatures , 2010 .

[6]  Peter B. Nagy,et al.  Nondestructive evaluation of adhesive joints by guided waves , 1989 .

[7]  W. Staszewski,et al.  Fatigue crack detection in metallic structures with Lamb waves and 3D laser vibrometry , 2007 .

[8]  Dawei Yan,et al.  Ultrasonic Evaluation of Artificial Kissing Bonds in CFRP Composites , 2014 .

[9]  Peter B. Nagy,et al.  Ultrasonic detection of kissing bonds in adhesive joints: NDE of adhesive bonds and bondlines, topical proceedings, valley forge, Pennsylvania (United States), 9–13 Oct. 1989. pp. 62–73. ASNT (1989) , 1992 .

[10]  Tribikram Kundu,et al.  Detection of kissing bonds by Lamb waves , 1998 .

[11]  S. Krishnaswamy,et al.  EMAT Generation and Laser Detection of Single Lamb Wave Modes , 1997 .

[12]  Williamsburg,et al.  DISBOND DETECTION IN BONDED ALUMINUM JOINTS USING LAMB WAVE AMPLITUDE AND TIME-OF-FLIGHT , 1998 .

[13]  V. Giurgiutiu Tuned Lamb Wave Excitation and Detection with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring , 2005 .

[14]  Fabrizio Scarpa,et al.  Structural health monitoring using scanning laser vibrometry: III. Lamb waves for fatigue crack detection , 2004 .

[15]  Wing Kong Chiu,et al.  Numerical modelling of scattered Lamb waves through varied damage size in challenging geometry , 2013 .

[16]  H. Murayama,et al.  Strain monitoring of a single-lap joint with embedded fiber-optic distributed sensors , 2012 .

[17]  Marcias Martinez,et al.  Structural health monitoring of bonded composite repairs – A critical comparison between ultrasonic Lamb wave approach and surface mounted crack sensor approach , 2013 .

[18]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Propagation of guided Lamb waves in bonded specimens using piezoelectric wafer active sensors , 2006, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[19]  Fabrizio Scarpa,et al.  Structural health monitoring using scanning laser vibrometry: I. Lamb wave sensing , 2004 .

[20]  B. Culshaw,et al.  Broadband Lamb wave measurements in aluminium and carbon/glass fibre reinforced composite materials using non-contacting laser generation and detection , 1997 .

[21]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Lamb wave generation with piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring , 2003, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[22]  Nik Rajic,et al.  A distributed sensing capability for in situ time-domain separation of Lamb waves , 2013, 2013 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing.

[23]  W. Staszewski,et al.  Modelling of Lamb waves for damage detection in metallic structures: Part II. Wave interactions with damage , 2003 .

[24]  Michael D. Todd,et al.  Health Monitoring Approach for Adhesively Bonded Joints , 2009 .

[25]  Bc Lee,et al.  Modelling of Lamb waves for damage detection in metallic structures: Part I. Wave propagation , 2003 .

[26]  Peter Cawley,et al.  A 2-dimensional Fourier transform method for the quantitative measurement of Lamb modes , 1990, IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics.

[27]  Wing Kong Chiu,et al.  Enhancement of Lamb wave–based in situ structural health monitoring through guided local geometry changes , 2013 .

[28]  Lowe,et al.  The transmission of Lamb waves across adhesively bonded lap joints , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Wing Kong Chiu,et al.  Predictive numerical simulation of lamb wave scattering from a wing skin defect for structural health monitoring system design , 2012 .

[30]  Michael D. Todd,et al.  An adhesive bond state classification method for a composite skin-to-spar joint using chaotic insonification , 2010 .

[31]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Disbond detection in adhesively bonded structures using piezoelectric wafer active sensors , 2004, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[32]  Wing Kong Chiu,et al.  Redirection of Lamb Waves for Structural Health Monitoring , 2012 .