Genetic characterization of the endangered Kiso horse using 31 microsatellite DNAs.

In order to contribute to conservation of the endangered Kiso horse, we clarified their genetic information using 31 microsatellite DNAs, and genotyped 125 horses, 83% of the existing breed. First, we clarified the current status of the horses. The horses were confirmed to have experienced rapid loss of population causing a bottleneck, and their effective population size was much smaller than their census size. Moreover, the number of alleles (6.3), observed heterozygosity (0.674), and expected heterozygosity (0.662) were in the same range as other endangered horses all over the world. Therefore, although their inbreeding level was not so severe (F(is): -0.017), the Kiso horse is surely one of the endangered. Second, we obtained genetic information of individuals. This information allowed us to understand the genetic distance of individuals, and might help in development of a reproductive strategy concerning the genetic distance between the mating pairs. Moreover, there appeared to be 4 subpopulations of Kiso horse, and this result was in good agreement with their historical background. Third, we confirmed that the parentage test for identification using the 31 microsatellite DNAs was highly reliable (probability of exclusion: 0.999999993). This identification increases the reliability of stud certification, and is also helpful for effective management. Understanding the genetic diversity within the population and the relationships among individuals is important to ensuring effective management for maintenance of genetic variation, and this study may help in conservation of the endangered Kiso horse.

[1]  V. Loeschcke,et al.  Genetic analysis, breed assignment and conservation priorities of three native Danish horse breeds. , 2008, Animal genetics.

[2]  B. Cho,et al.  Genetic characterization and polymorphisms for parentage testing of the Jeju horse using 20 microsatellite loci. , 2008, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[3]  T. Freitas,et al.  Genetic diversity in the Pantaneiro horse breed assessed using microsatellite DNA markers. , 2008, Genetics and molecular research : GMR.

[4]  F. Rousset genepop’007: a complete re‐implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux , 2008, Molecular ecology resources.

[5]  E. G. Cothran,et al.  Inbreeding and genetic structure in the endangered Sorraia horse breed: implications for its conservation and management. , 2007, The Journal of heredity.

[6]  S. Kalinowski,et al.  Revising how the computer program cervus accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[7]  A. Aguirre,et al.  Genetic diversity within and among four South European native horse breeds based on microsatellite DNA analysis: implications for conservation. , 2005, The Journal of heredity.

[8]  M. Oom,et al.  Genetic Structure of an Endangered Portuguese Semiferal Pony Breed, the Garrano , 2005, Biochemical Genetics.

[9]  G. Evanno,et al.  Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[10]  R. Pong-Wong,et al.  Efficiency of the Use of Pedigree and Molecular Marker Information in Conservation Programs , 2005, Genetics.

[11]  G. Brem,et al.  Microsatellite diversity, population subdivision and gene flow in the Lipizzan horse. , 2004, Animal genetics.

[12]  N. Saitou,et al.  Microsatellite variation in Japanese and Asian horses and their phylogenetic relationship using a European horse outgroup. , 2003, The Journal of heredity.

[13]  C. Schlötterer,et al.  microsatellite analyser (MSA): a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets , 2003 .

[14]  H. Kakoi,et al.  DNA Typing with 17 Microsatellites for Parentage Verification of Racehorses in Japan , 2001 .

[15]  T. Tozaki,et al.  Population study and validation of paternity testing for Thoroughbred horses by 15 microsatellite loci. , 2001, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[16]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. , 2000, Genetics.

[17]  Gordon Luikart,et al.  Review of DNA‐based census and effective population size estimators , 1998 .

[18]  G. Luikart,et al.  Usefulness of molecular markers for detecting population bottlenecks via monitoring genetic change , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[19]  Y. Kawamoto,et al.  Phylogenetic Relationships among Japanese Native and Alien Horses Estimated by Protein Polymorphisms , 1998 .

[20]  A Jamieson,et al.  Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion. , 1997, Animal genetics.

[21]  J M Cornuet,et al.  Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. , 1996, Genetics.

[22]  François Rousset,et al.  GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetic software for exact tests and ecumenicism , 1995 .

[23]  M W Feldman,et al.  An evaluation of genetic distances for use with microsatellite loci. , 1994, Genetics.

[24]  N. Freimer,et al.  Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  L. Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites , 1994, Nature.

[26]  B. Weir,et al.  ESTIMATING F‐STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTURE , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  N. Gengler,et al.  Combining microsatellite and pedigree data to estimate relationships among Skyros ponies , 2010, Journal of Applied Genetics.

[28]  T. Tozaki,et al.  Molecular Analysis Using Mitochondrial DNA and Microsatellites to Infer the Formation Process of Japanese Native Horse Populations , 2007, Biochemical Genetics.

[29]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Farm Animal Genetic Resources , 2004 .