Proteome response at the edge of protein aggregation

Proteins adopt defined structures and are crucial to most cellular functions. Their misfolding and aggregation is associated with numerous degenerative human disorders such as type II diabetes, Huntington's or Alzheimer's diseases. Here, we aim to understand why cells promote the formation of protein foci. Comparison of two amyloid-β-peptide variants, mostly insoluble but differently recruited by the cell (inclusion body versus diffused), reveals small differences in cell fitness and proteome response. We suggest that the levels of oxidative stress act as a sensor to trigger protein recruitment into foci. Our data support a common cytoplasmic response being able to discern and react to the specific properties of polypeptides.

[1]  J. Frydman,et al.  Spatial sequestration of misfolded proteins by a dynamic chaperone pathway enhances cellular fitness to stress , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[2]  Ehud Cohen,et al.  Opposing Activities Protect Against Age-Onset Proteotoxicity , 2006, Science.

[3]  J. Morley,et al.  The senescence accelerated mouse (SAMP8) as a model for oxidative stress and Alzheimer's disease. , 2012, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[4]  Judianne Davis,et al.  Structural conversion of neurotoxic amyloid-β(1–42) oligomers to fibrils , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[5]  C. Dobson,et al.  Protein aggregation and aggregate toxicity: new insights into protein folding, misfolding diseases and biological evolution , 2003, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[6]  R. Korona,et al.  Fitness costs of minimal sequence alterations causing protein instability and toxicity. , 2014, Molecular biology and evolution.

[7]  Sandra Tenreiro,et al.  Harnessing the power of yeast to unravel the molecular basis of neurodegeneration , 2013, Journal of neurochemistry.

[8]  C. Ross,et al.  What is the role of protein aggregation in neurodegeneration? , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[9]  S. Ventura,et al.  Protein aggregation propensity is a crucial determinant of intracellular inclusion formation and quality control degradation. , 2013, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[10]  Salvador Ventura,et al.  Mutagenesis of the central hydrophobic cluster in Abeta42 Alzheimer's peptide. Side-chain properties correlate with aggregation propensities. , 2006, The FEBS journal.

[11]  Salvador Ventura,et al.  Evolutionary selection for protein aggregation. , 2012, Biochemical Society transactions.

[12]  Peter Walter,et al.  Functional and Genomic Analyses Reveal an Essential Coordination between the Unfolded Protein Response and ER-Associated Degradation , 2000, Cell.

[13]  M. Babu,et al.  Cellular Strategies for Regulating Functional and Nonfunctional Protein Aggregation , 2012, Cell reports.

[14]  S. Michnick,et al.  High-resolution mapping of protein concentration reveals principles of proteome architecture and adaptation. , 2014, Cell reports.

[15]  J. Renaut,et al.  The Proteome Response to Amyloid Protein Expression In Vivo , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  A. Link,et al.  Yeast Asc1p and Mammalian RACK1 Are Functionally Orthologous Core 40S Ribosomal Proteins That Repress Gene Expression , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[17]  Guillaume Lamour,et al.  Promiscuity as a functional trait: intrinsically disordered regions as central players of interactomes. , 2013, The Biochemical journal.

[18]  C. Dobson,et al.  Position‐Dependent Electrostatic Protection against Protein Aggregation , 2009, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[19]  M. B. Metzger,et al.  Analysis of quality control substrates in distinct cellular compartments reveals a unique role for Rpn4p in tolerating misfolded membrane proteins. , 2008, Molecular biology of the cell.

[20]  Alexei Vazquez Metabolic States Following Accumulation of Intracellular Aggregates: Implications for Neurodegenerative Diseases , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  D. Hartl,et al.  Misfolded proteins impose a dosage-dependent fitness cost and trigger a cytosolic unfolded protein response in yeast , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  F. Avilés,et al.  Linking amyloid protein aggregation and yeast survival. , 2011, Molecular bioSystems.

[23]  Y. Chernoff,et al.  Abnormal proteins can form aggresome in yeast: aggresome‐targeting signals and components of the machinery , 2009, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[24]  T. Langer,et al.  Quality control of mitochondrial proteostasis. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[25]  Julie Grantham,et al.  The Polarisome Is Required for Segregation and Retrograde Transport of Protein Aggregates , 2010, Cell.

[26]  Jane Clarke,et al.  Single-molecule fluorescence reveals sequence-specific misfolding in multidomain proteins , 2011, Nature.

[27]  J. Langowski,et al.  Protein disorder prevails under crowded conditions. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[28]  Jörg Gsponer,et al.  Intrinsically disordered proteins: regulation and disease. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[29]  Joaquín Dopazo,et al.  An Evolutionary Trade-Off between Protein Turnover Rate and Protein Aggregation Favors a Higher Aggregation Propensity in Fast Degrading Proteins , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  B. Bukau,et al.  Hsp42 is required for sequestration of protein aggregates into deposition sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  C. Cowan,et al.  What is the pathological significance of tau oligomers? , 2012, Biochemical Society transactions.

[32]  Salvador Ventura,et al.  Mutagenesis of the central hydrophobic cluster in Aβ42 Alzheimer's peptide , 2006 .

[33]  Jacinte Beerten,et al.  Aggregation gatekeepers modulate protein homeostasis of aggregating sequences and affect bacterial fitness. , 2012, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[34]  J. François,et al.  Validation of reference genes for quantitative expression analysis by real-time RT-PCR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2009, BMC Molecular Biology.