Evaluation of the traumatic coma data bank computed tomography classification for severe head injury.

This study determines the interrater and intrarater reliability of the Traumatic Coma Data Bank (TCDB) computed tomography (CT) scan classification for severe head injury. This classification grades the severity of the injury as follows: I = normal, II = diffuse injury, III = diffuse injury with swelling, IV = diffuse injury with shift, V = mass lesion surgically evacuated, or VI = mass lesion not operated. Patients with severe closed head injury were included. Outcome was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at 3 and 6 months. Four observers, two of them classifying the scans twice, independently evaluated CT scans. Of the initial CT scans of 63 patients (36 males, 27 females; age, 34+/-24 years), 6.3% were class I, 26.9% class II, 28.6% class III, 6.3% class IV, 22.2% were class V, and 9.6% class VI. The overall interrater and intrarater reliability was 0.80 and 0.85, respectively. Separate analyses resulted in higher inter- and intrarater reliabilities for the mass lesion categories (V and VI), 0.94 and 0.91, respectively, than the diffuse categories (I-IV) 0.71 and 0.67. Merging category III with IV, and V with VI resulted in inter- and intrarater reliabilities of 0.93 and 0.78, respectively. Glasgow outcome scores after 6 months were as follows: 19 dead (30%), one vegetative (2%), five severely disabled (8%), 17 moderately disabled (27%), and 21 good recovery (33%). Association measures (Sommers' D) between CT and GOS scores were statistically significant for all observers. This study shows a high intra- and interobserver agreement in the assessment of CT scan abnormalities and confirms the predictive power on outcome when the TCDB classification is used.

[1]  Nigel O'Brian,et al.  Generalizability Theory I , 2003 .

[2]  N. Stocchetti,et al.  Mass volume measurement in severe head injury: accuracy and feasibility of two pragmatic methods , 2000, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[3]  G. Murray,et al.  Evaluation of designs for clinical trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury. European Brain Injury Consortium. , 1999, Journal of neurotrauma.

[4]  D. Newell,et al.  Effects of the bradykinin antagonist Bradycor (deltibant, CP-1027) in severe traumatic brain injury: results of a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. American Brain Injury Consortium Study Group. , 1999, Journal of neurotrauma.

[5]  J M Wardlaw,et al.  Predicting survival using simple clinical variables: a case study in traumatic brain injury , 1999, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  A. Kakarieka,et al.  Review on traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. , 1997, Neurological research.

[7]  A. Harders,et al.  Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage and its treatment with nimodipine. German tSAH Study Group. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  R. Spetzler,et al.  Impact of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage on outcome in nonpenetrating head injury. Part I: A proposed computerized tomography grading scale. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  D. Hadley,et al.  Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging classification of head injury. , 1992, Journal of neurotrauma.

[10]  M A Foulkes,et al.  The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography. , 1992, Journal of neurotrauma.

[11]  Anthony Marmarou,et al.  A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography , 1991 .

[12]  J. Miller,et al.  The danger of an ultra-early computed tomographic scan in a patient with an evolving acute epidural hematoma. , 1991, Neurosurgery.

[13]  R. Scienza,et al.  The relevance of anatomic and hemodynamic factors to a classification of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. , 1991, Neurosurgery.

[14]  B. M. Toole,et al.  ABSENT OR COMPRESSED BASAL CISTERNS ON FIRST CT SCAN: OMINOUS PREDICTORS OF OUTCOME IN SEVERE HEAD INJURY , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  H. Schouten,et al.  Inter observer agreement in the assessment of the motor response of the Glasgow ‘coma’ scale , 1978, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[16]  R. Knill-Jones,et al.  Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma. , 1978, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[17]  B. Jennett,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOME AFTER SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE A Practical Scale , 1975, The Lancet.

[18]  B. Jennett,et al.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. , 1974, Lancet.

[19]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[20]  G. Murray,et al.  The value of the "worst" computed tomographic scan in clinical studies of moderate and severe head injury. European Brain Injury Consortium. , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[21]  B Jennett,et al.  Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. , 1975, Lancet.