What you see is what you get: motor resonance in peripheral vision

Observation of others’ actions evokes a subliminal motor resonant response, which reflects the motor program encoding observed actions. The possibility that actions located in the peripheral field of vision may also activate motor resonant responses has not been investigated. We examine the excitability modulation of motor pathways in response to grasping actions viewed in near peripheral vision; results are directly compared to responses to the same actions viewed in central vision (Borroni et al. in Eur J Neurosci 34:662–669, 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07779.x). We hypothesize that actions observed in peripheral vision are effective in modulating the excitability of motor pathways, but that responses have a low kinematic specificity. While the neural resources of central vision provide the most accurate perception of biological motion, the decreased visual acuity in periphery may be sufficient to discriminate only general aspects of movement and perhaps to recognize the gist of visual scenes. Right-handed subjects observed a video of two grasping actions at 10° eccentricity in the horizontal plane. Motor-evoked potentials were elicited in the right OP and ADM muscles by TMS of the left primary motor cortex at different delays during the observed actions. Results show that actions viewed in near peripheral vision are effective in modulating the subliminal activation of motor circuits, but that responses are rough and inaccurate, and do not reflect the motor program encoding the observed action or its goal. We suggest that due to their limited kinematic accuracy, these subliminal motor responses may provide information about the general aspects of observed actions, rather than their specific execution.

[1]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Modulation of premotor mirror neuron activity during observation of unpredictable grasping movements , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[2]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Eccentric perception of biological motion is unscalably poor , 2005, Vision Research.

[3]  W. Prinz,et al.  Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  Stimulus magnification equates identification and discrimination of biological motion across the visual field , 2008, Vision Research.

[5]  S. R. Searle,et al.  Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models , 2005 .

[6]  G. Johansson Studies on Visual Perception of Locomotion , 1977, Perception.

[7]  M. Rosa,et al.  A distinct anatomical network of cortical areas for analysis of motion in far peripheral vision , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Aymeric Guillot,et al.  Multiple roles of motor imagery during action observation , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[10]  G. Knoblich,et al.  The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  F. Baldissera,et al.  Excitability changes in human corticospinal projections to muscles moving hand and fingers while viewing a reaching and grasping action , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[12]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  Perception of biological motion at varying eccentricity , 2010 .

[13]  Katsumi Aoki,et al.  Recent development of flow visualization , 2004, J. Vis..

[14]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Goal Representation in Human Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  K. Verfaillie Perceiving Human Locomotion: Priming Effects in Direction Discrimination , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[16]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  The visual perception of human locomotion. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[17]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  Andrew A G Mattar,et al.  Motor Learning by Observing , 2005, Neuron.

[19]  L. Fogassi,et al.  Monkey gaze behaviour during action observation and its relationship to mirror neuron activity , 2013, The European journal of neuroscience.

[20]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  Mirroring avatars: dissociation of action and intention in human motor resonance , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[21]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Motor cortex excitability is tightly coupled to observed movements , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  B. Boycott,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell density and cortical magnification factor in the primate , 1990, Vision Research.

[23]  A. Mizuno,et al.  A change of the leading player in flow Visualization technique , 2006, J. Vis..

[24]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Grasping with tools: corticospinal excitability reflects observed hand movements. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Goal or movement? Action representation within the primary motor cortex , 2013, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  Bruce C Hansen,et al.  Peripheral vision: good for biological motion, bad for signal noise segregation? , 2007, Journal of vision.

[29]  Gabriella Cerri,et al.  Bilateral motor resonance evoked by observation of a one‐hand movement: role of the primary motor cortex , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[30]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Parietal Lobe: From Action Organization to Intention Understanding , 2005, Science.

[31]  E. Koechlin,et al.  What Are They Up To? The Role of Sensory Evidence and Prior Knowledge in Action Understanding , 2011, PloS one.

[32]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  A First- and Second-Order Motion Energy Analysis of Peripheral Motion Illusions Leads to Further Evidence of “Feature Blur” in Peripheral Vision , 2011, PloS one.

[33]  P. Bex,et al.  The perception of suprathreshold contrast and fast adaptive filtering. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[34]  Andrea Falini,et al.  The shape of motor resonance: Right- or left-handed? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[35]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  T. Poggio,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  V. Gallese Embodied simulation: from mirror neuron systems to interpersonal relations. , 2007, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[39]  V. Gallese Bodily selves in relation: embodied simulation as second-person perspective on intersubjectivity , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  A. L. Yarbus,et al.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967, Springer US.

[41]  S. Blakemore,et al.  Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  F. Scharnowski,et al.  Long-lasting modulation of feature integration by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[43]  Cosimo Urgesi,et al.  Vicarious motor activation during action perception: beyond correlational evidence , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[44]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Prefrontal involvement in imitation learning of hand actions: Effects of practice and expertise , 2007, NeuroImage.

[45]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[46]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[47]  F. Baldissera,et al.  Cyclic time course of motor excitability modulation during the observation of a cyclic hand movement , 2005, Brain Research.

[48]  B. Bertenthal,et al.  Does Perception of Biological Motion Rely on Specific Brain Regions? , 2001, NeuroImage.

[49]  B. E. Maki,et al.  The use of peripheral vision to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp balance-recovery reactions , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  S. Blakemore,et al.  Dynamic Modulation of Human Motor Activity When Observing Actions , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[52]  U. Castiello,et al.  Modulation of the action control system by social intention: unexpected social requests override preplanned action. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  A. Cowey,et al.  Models of ganglion cell topography in the retina of macaque monkeys and their application to sensory cortical scaling , 1996, Neuroscience.

[54]  M. Goodale,et al.  Peripheral vision for perception and action , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[55]  Lester C. Loschky,et al.  The contributions of central versus peripheral vision to scene gist recognition. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[56]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Phase-specific modulation of cortical motor output during movement observation , 2001, Neuroreport.

[57]  Scott T Grafton,et al.  The Relative Influence of Goal and Kinematics on Corticospinal Excitability Depends on the Information Provided to the Observer. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.