Mixed classical-quantal representation for open quantum systems

For all but the simplest open quantum systems, quantum trajectory Monte Carlo methods, including quantum jump and quantum state diffusion (QSD) methods, have besides their intuitive insight into the measurement process a numerical advantage over direct solutions for the density matrix, especially where many degrees of freedom are involved. For QSD the trajectories are continuous, and often localize to small near-minimum uncertainty wave packets which follow approximately classical paths in phase space. The mixed representation discussed here takes advantage of this localization to reduce computing space and time by a further significant factor, using a quantum oscillator representation that follows a classical path. The classical part of this representation describes the time evolution of the expectation values of position and momentum in classical phase space, while the quantal part determines the degree of localization of the quantum mechanical state around this phase space point. The method can be applied whether or not the localization is produced by a measuring apparatus.

[1]  I. Percival Localization of wide-open quantum systems , 1994 .

[2]  Knight,et al.  Comparison of quantum-state diffusion and quantum-jump simulations of two-photon processes in a dissipative environment. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[3]  N. Gisin,et al.  Explicit examples of dissipative systems in the quantum state diffusion model , 1993 .

[4]  N. Gisin,et al.  The quantum state diffusion picture of physical processes , 1993 .

[5]  Ian C. Percival,et al.  Quantum state diffusion, localization and quantum dispersion entropy , 1993 .

[6]  Klaus Mølmer,et al.  A Monte Carlo wave function method in quantum optics , 1993, Optical Society of America Annual Meeting.

[7]  N. Gisin,et al.  The quantum-state diffusion model applied to open systems , 1992 .

[8]  Zoller,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of the atomic master equation for spontaneous emission. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[9]  L. Diósi Quantum stochastic processes as models for state vector reduction , 1988 .

[10]  Savage,et al.  Master equation for a damped nonlinear oscillator. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[11]  N. Gisin Quantum measurements and stochastic processes , 1984 .

[12]  D. Walls,et al.  Quantum theory of optical bistability. I. Nonlinear polarisability model , 1980 .

[13]  G. Lindblad On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups , 1976 .

[14]  E. Heller Time‐dependent approach to semiclassical dynamics , 1975 .

[15]  Lowell S. Brown,et al.  Geonium theory: Physics of a single electron or ion in a Penning trap , 1986 .

[16]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .