Assessing cortical synchronization during transcranial direct current stimulation: A graph-theoretical analysis

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulation technique that can alter cortical excitability and modulate behaviour in a polarity-dependent way. Despite the widespread use of this method in the neuroscience field, its effects on ongoing local or global (network level) neuronal activity are still not foreseeable. A way to shed light on the neuronal mechanisms underlying the cortical connectivity changes induced by tDCS is provided by the combination of tDCS with electroencephalography (EEG). In this study, twelve healthy subjects underwent online tDCS-EEG recording (i.e., simultaneous), during resting-state, using 19 EEG channels. The protocol involved anodal, cathodal and sham stimulation conditions, with the active and the reference electrodes in the left frontocentral area (FC3) and on the forehead over the right eyebrow, respectively. The data were processed using a network model, based on graph theory and the synchronization likelihood. The resulting graphs were analysed for four frequency bands (theta, alpha, beta and gamma) to evaluate the presence of tDCS-induced differences in synchronization patterns and graph theory measures. The resting state network connectivity resulted altered during tDCS, in a polarity-specific manner for theta and alpha bands. Anodal tDCS weakened synchronization with respect to the baseline over the fronto-central areas in the left hemisphere, for theta band (p<0.05). In contrast, during cathodal tDCS a significant increase in inter-hemispheric synchronization connectivity was observed over the centro-parietal, centro-occipital and parieto-occipital areas for the alpha band (p<0.05). Local graph measures showed a tDCS-induced polarity-specific differences that regarded modifications of network activities rather than specific region properties. Our results show that applying tDCS during the resting state modulates local synchronization as well as network properties in slow frequency bands, in a polarity-specific manner.

[1]  S. Bestmann,et al.  Understanding the behavioural consequences of noninvasive brain stimulation , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Network-based statistic: Identifying differences in brain networks , 2010, NeuroImage.

[3]  Andrew K. Jones,et al.  A7DB: a relational database for mutational, physiological and pharmacological data related to the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor , 2005, BMC Neuroscience.

[4]  F. Zappasodi,et al.  Local and remote effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the electrical activity of the motor cortical network , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[5]  N. Bolognini,et al.  TDCS increases cortical excitability: Direct evidence from TMS–EEG , 2014, Cortex.

[6]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Exploring the network dynamics underlying brain activity during rest , 2014, Progress in Neurobiology.

[7]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Simultaneous transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and whole-head magnetoencephalography (MEG): assessing the impact of tDCS on slow cortical magnetic fields , 2016, NeuroImage.

[8]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Modulating functional connectivity patterns and topological functional organization of the human brain with transcranial direct current stimulation , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[9]  J. Thorne,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex modulates working memory performance: combined behavioural and electrophysiological evidence , 2011, BMC Neuroscience.

[10]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Microstates in resting-state EEG: Current status and future directions , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[11]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Synchronization likelihood with explicit time-frequency priors , 2006, NeuroImage.

[12]  D. Purpura,et al.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  David Politte,et al.  Sources of non-physiologic noise in simultaneous EEG-fMRI data: A phantom study , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[14]  Paul B. Fitzgerald,et al.  The effect of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on gamma activity and working memory in schizophrenia , 2015, Psychiatry Research.

[15]  F. Fregni,et al.  Cumulative effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on EEG oscillations and attention/working memory during subacute neurorehabilitation of traumatic brain injury , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  J. Born,et al.  Slow oscillation electrical brain stimulation during waking promotes EEG theta activity and memory encoding , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  Anirban Dutta,et al.  Delineating the effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on myoelectric control based on slow cortical potentials , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  Increased gamma-band synchrony precedes switching of conscious perceptual objects in binocular rivalry , 2005, Neuroreport.

[21]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Imaging human brain networks to improve the clinical efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[22]  D. Tucker,et al.  EEG coherency II: experimental comparisons of multiple measures , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  C. Stam,et al.  Synchronization likelihood: an unbiased measure of generalized synchronization in multivariate data sets , 2002 .

[24]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Physiological Basis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[25]  H. Möller,et al.  Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Changes Connectivity of Resting-State Networks during fMRI , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  P. Matthews,et al.  Modulation of movement‐associated cortical activation by transcranial direct current stimulation , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  Bin He,et al.  Simultaneous high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex and motor imagery , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[29]  R. L. Pagano,et al.  Translational research in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a systematic review of studies in animals , 2011, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[30]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  A. Antal,et al.  Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients , 2007, Brain Research Bulletin.

[32]  Sven Bestmann,et al.  Concurrent brain-stimulation and neuroimaging for studies of cognition , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Debora Brignani,et al.  Combining Transcranial Electrical Stimulation With Electroencephalography , 2012, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[34]  Francisco Rosales,et al.  An Efficient Implementation of the Synchronization Likelihood Algorithm for Functional Connectivity , 2015, Neuroinformatics.

[35]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation and power spectral parameters: a tDCS/EEG co-registration study , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[36]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[37]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Synchronization dynamics and evidence for a repertoire of network states in resting EEG , 2012, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[38]  Kyongsik Yun,et al.  Beta-frequency EEG activity increased during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2014, Neuroreport.

[39]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Direct electrical stimulation of human cortex — the gold standard for mapping brain functions? , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  F. Deligianni,et al.  Relating resting-state fMRI and EEG whole-brain connectomes across frequency bands , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[41]  Bruno Cozzi,et al.  Expression of calcium-binding proteins and selected neuropeptides in the human, chimpanzee, and crab-eating macaque claustrum , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[42]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Disturbed resting state EEG synchronization in bipolar disorder: A graph-theoretic analysis☆ , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[43]  P. Grant,et al.  Dopaminergic foundations of schizotypy as measured by the German version of the Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences (O-LIFE)—a suitable endophenotype of schizophrenia , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[44]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[45]  David J. Cutler,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of Oligonucleotide Probe Selection for DNA Microarrays , 2010, PloS one.

[46]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Comparing Brain Networks of Different Size and Connectivity Density Using Graph Theory , 2010, PloS one.

[47]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Introducing graph theory to track for neuroplastic alterations in the resting human brain: A transcranial direct current stimulation study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[48]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias , 2011, NeuroImage.

[49]  Bin He,et al.  High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Induces Both Acute and Persistent Changes in Broadband Cortical Synchronization: A Simultaneous tDCS–EEG Study , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[50]  Laura Pieroni,et al.  EEG mean frequency changes in healthy subjects during prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  C. Stam,et al.  Phase lag index: Assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[52]  Arno Villringer,et al.  A Comparison between Uni- and Bilateral tDCS Effects on Functional Connectivity of the Human Motor Cortex , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[53]  Vincent P. Clark,et al.  Tracking the neuroplastic changes associated with transcranial direct current stimulation: a push for multimodal imaging , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[54]  Cornelis J Stam,et al.  Does sleep restore the topology of functional brain networks? , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[55]  N. Zaretskaya,et al.  Introspection, attention or awareness? The role of the frontal lobe in binocular rivalry , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[56]  Chiara Bozzacchi,et al.  Modulation of spontaneous alpha brain rhythms using low-intensity transcranial direct-current stimulation , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[57]  Paul B. Fitzgerald,et al.  TDCS increases cortical excitability: Direct evidence from TMS-EEG , 2016, Cortex.

[58]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Disturbed fluctuations of resting state EEG synchronization in Alzheimer's disease , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[59]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Learned Non-Rigid Object Motion is a View-Invariant Cue to Recognizing Novel Objects , 2012, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[60]  L. Colgin.  Mechanisms and functions of theta rhythms. , 2013, Annual review of neuroscience.

[61]  Michael J. Banissy,et al.  Best of both worlds: promise of combining brain stimulation and brain connectome , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[62]  P. Sauseng,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) increases frontal–midline theta activity in the human EEG: A preliminary investigation of non-invasive stimulation , 2015, Neuroscience Letters.

[63]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[64]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[65]  C. J. Stam,et al.  EEG synchronization likelihood in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease during a working memory task , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[66]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Dynamic modulation of intrinsic functional connectivity by transcranial direct current stimulation. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[67]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews the Contribution of Tms–eeg Coregistration in the Exploration of the Human Cortical Connectome , 2022 .

[68]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Modelling Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Cognitive Neuroscience , 2022 .

[69]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  TMS-EEG co-registration: On TMS-induced artifact , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[70]  Jie Xiang,et al.  Disturbed connectivity of EEG functional networks in alcoholism: a graph-theoretic analysis. , 2014, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[71]  A. Priori,et al.  Non‐synaptic mechanisms underlie the after‐effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[72]  F. Fregni,et al.  Noninvasive Brain Stimulation with Low-Intensity Electrical Currents: Putative Mechanisms of Action for Direct and Alternating Current Stimulation , 2010, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[73]  G. Tononi,et al.  Rethinking segregation and integration: contributions of whole-brain modelling , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[74]  Joerg F. Hipp,et al.  Physiological processes non-linearly affect electrophysiological recordings during transcranial electric stimulation , 2016, NeuroImage.

[75]  L. Bindman,et al.  The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long‐lasting after‐effects , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[76]  G. Alon,et al.  Non-invasive electrical stimulation of the brain (ESB) modifies the resting-state network connectivity of the primary motor cortex: A proof of concept fMRI study , 2011, Brain Research.