Mobility, Skills, and the Michigan Non-Compete Experiment

Whereas a number of studies have considered the implications of employee mobility, comparatively little research has considered institutional factors governing the ability of employees to move from one firm to another. This paper explores a legal constraint on mobility---employee non-compete agreements---by exploiting Michigan's apparently inadvertent 1985 reversal of its non-compete enforcement policy as a natural experiment. Using a differences-in-differences approach, and controlling for changes in the auto industry central to Michigan's economy, we find that the enforcement of non-competes indeed attenuates mobility. Moreover, non-compete enforcement decreases mobility more sharply for inventors with firm-specific skills and for those who specialize in narrow technical fields. The results speak to the literature on employee mobility while offering a credibly exogenous source of variation that can extend previous research on the implications of such mobility.

[1]  Joshua Lerner,et al.  Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It , 2011 .

[2]  Jinyoun Kim,et al.  Labor Mobility of Scientists, Technological Diffusion, and the Firm's Patenting Decision , 2001 .

[3]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Firm-specific Capital and Turnover , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Kevin Morgan,et al.  Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and route 128: AnnaLee Saxenian, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994) 226 pp; Price [UK pound]19.95, ISBN 0 674 75339 9 , 1996 .

[5]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Asymmetry of knowledge spillovers between MNCs and host country firms , 2006 .

[6]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Liquidity Events and the Geographic Distribution of Entrepreneurial Activity , 2003 .

[7]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. , 1984 .

[8]  Michael Stolpe,et al.  Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: the case of liquid crystal display technology , 2002 .

[9]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The effects of departmental demography on turnover: The case of a university. , 1983 .

[10]  Per Strömberg,et al.  Venture Capitalists as Principals: Contracting, Screening, and Monitoring , 2001 .

[11]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[12]  Ronald J. Gilson,et al.  The Legal Infrastructure of High Technology Industrial Districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and Covenants Not to Compete , 1998 .

[13]  Erik N. Dean.  Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do about It , 2008 .

[14]  Edward P. Lazear,et al.  The Structure of Wages and Internal Mobility , 2004 .

[15]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  Entrepreneurial Spawning: Public Corporations and the Genesis of New Ventures, 1986-1999 , 2003 .

[16]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry , 2002 .

[17]  G. Becker,et al.  Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis , 1962, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  Pierre Azoulay,et al.  Superstar Extinction , 2008 .

[19]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[20]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  Social Resources and Mobility Outcomes: A Replication and Extension , 1988 .

[21]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Learning - by - Hiring: When Is Mobility More Likely to Facilitate Interfirm Knowledge Transfer? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  Reputations for Toughness in Patent Enforcement: Implications for Knowledge Spillovers via Inventor Mobility , 2007 .

[23]  richard-l-alfred-thomas-christopher-brian-m-malsbe.  Covenants Not to Compete: A State-By-State Survey , 2008 .

[24]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[25]  D. Cox.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[26]  John McHale,et al.  Gone But Not Forgotten: Labor Flows, Knowledge Spillovers, and Enduring Social Capital , 2003 .

[27]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[28]  James J. Anton,et al.  Start-ups, Spin-offs, and Internal Projects , 1995 .

[29]  N. Glenn,et al.  Age, Period, And Cohort Effects , 2007 .

[30]  R D Weber,et al.  Covenants not to compete. , 1998, Michigan medicine.

[31]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. , 1973 .

[32]  C. Ai,et al.  Interaction terms in logit and probit models , 2003 .

[33]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Entry by Spinoffs , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[35]  G. Hoetker.  The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues , 2007 .

[36]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[37]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Entrepreneurial Spawning: Public Corporations and the Genesis of New Ventures, 1986-1999 , 2003 .

[38]  E. Duflo,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .

[39]  Christopher J. Singleton,et al.  Auto Industry Jobs in the 1980's: A Decade of Transition , 1992 .

[40]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Small Worlds and Regional Innovation , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[41]  April Franco,et al.  Knowledge Diffusion through Employee Mobility , 2000 .

[42]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[43]  Boris Groysberg,et al.  Can They Take It With Them? The Portability of Star Knowledge Workers' Performance , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[44]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[45]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Intra-Industry Spinoffs , 2006 .

[46]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Gone but not Forgotten: Knowledge Flows, Labor Mobility, and Enduring Social Relationships , 2006 .

[47]  E. Lazear,et al.  Raids and Offermatching , 1984 .

[48]  Brian M. Malsberger.  Covenants Not To Compete: A State-by-state Survey , 2004 .

[49]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Do Subsidies to Commercial R&D Reduce Market Failures? Microeconomic Evaluation Studies , 1999 .

[50]  Chris J. Sablynski,et al.  WHY PEOPLE STAY: USING JOB EMBEDDEDNESS TO PREDICT VOLUNTARY TURNOVER , 2001 .

[51]  K. Dau-Schmidt,et al.  High Velocity Labor Economics: A Review Essay of Working in Silicon Valley: Economic and Legal Analysis of a High-Velocity Labor Market , 2004 .

[52]  David R. Lampe,et al.  Route 128: Lessons From Boston's High Tech Community , 1992 .

[53]  Helen LaVan,et al.  A Logit Model to Predict the Enforceability of Noncompete Agreements , 2000 .

[54]  Julia Lane,et al.  Turnover in an Accounting Firm , 1998, Journal of Labor Economics.

[55]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  'Names Game': Harnessing Inventors Patent Data for Economic Research , 2006 .

[56]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[57]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[58]  Micah Altman,et al.  Encyclopedia of Social Measurement , 2004 .

[59]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data , 2008 .

[60]  Jasjit Singh.  Distributed R&D, Cross-Regional Knowledge Integration and Quality of Innovative Output , 2006 .

[61]  Shmuel Nitzan,et al.  Optimum Contracts for Research Personnel, Research Employment, and the Establishment of "Rival" Enterprises , 1982, Journal of Labor Economics.

[62]  V. Rich.  Personal communication , 1989, Nature.

[63]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[64]  Kurt H. Decker,et al.  Covenants Not to Compete , 1993 .

[65]  James B. Rebitzer,et al.  Job-Hopping in Silicon Valley: Some Evidence Concerning the Micro-Foundations of a High Technology Cluster , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[66]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? , 2003 .

[67]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[68]  E. F. Jackofsky,et al.  The hypothesized effects of ability in the turnover process. , 1983, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[69]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[70]  Mark J. Garmaise.  Ties that Truly Bind: Noncompetition Agreements, Executive Compensation, and Firm Investment , 2011 .

[71]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[72]  William T. Lifland.  State antitrust law , 1984 .

[73]  W. Mobley,et al.  Review and Conceptual Analysis of the Employee Turnover Process , 1979 .

[74]  W. Boeker.  Executive Migration and Strategic Change: The Effect of Top Manager Movement on Product-Market Entry , 1997 .

[75]  Naomi R. Lamoreaux,et al.  Mobilizing Venture Capital during the Second Industrial Revolution: Cleveland, Ohio, 1870-1920 , 2006 .

[76]  Thomas Rønde,et al.  Trade Secret Laws, Labour Mobility and Innovations , 2002 .

[77]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  An Alternative Approach: The Unfolding Model of Voluntary Employee Turnover , 1994 .

[78]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[79]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Innovation and its Discontents , 2004 .

[80]  J. Singer,et al.  Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis , 2003 .

[81]  C. Trevor,et al.  Interactions Among Actual Ease-of-Movement Determinants and Job Satisfaction in the Prediction of Voluntary Turnover , 2001 .

[82]  R. Topel.  Specific Capital, Mobility, and Wages: Wages Rise with Job Seniority , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.