Effects of Language Familiarity on e-Negotiation: Use of Native vs. Nonnative Language

This study explored the influence of language familiarity on persuasion behavior in e-negotiation. This was motivated by booming global e-business and the resulting popularity of cross-country e-negotiation. A laboratory e-negotiation experiment was conducted with two groups who used native and nonnative language in negotiation separately. We found that language familiarity has a positive effect on both language self-efficacy and negotiation self-efficacy. Moreover, mediated effect analyses revealed a critical effect path from language self-efficacy to negotiation self-efficacy to communication efficiency to communication effectiveness to persuasion behavior. This indicates that language familiarity is the fundamentally critical factor in guiding persuasion behavior since it can affect both language self-efficacy and negotiation self-efficacy. Therefore, determining how to improve both language self-efficacy and negotiation self-efficacy when negotiating in a nonnative language is very important. Finally, possible contributions provided by information technology are proposed from the viewpoint of the information systems discipline.

[1]  Mareike Schoop,et al.  Negoisst: a negotiation support system for electronic business-to-business negotiations in e-commerce , 2003, Data Knowl. Eng..

[2]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Negotiation in Social Conflict , 1993 .

[3]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Javier Coronado-Aliegro.  The Effect of Self-Assessment in the Self-Efficacy of Students Studying Spanish as a Foreign Language , 2007 .

[5]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[6]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: a meta-analytic review and test of two theories. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Frank Acuff,et al.  How to negotiate anything with anyone anywhere around the world, third edition , 1992 .

[8]  Colleen Keough.  Bargaining Arguments and Argumentative Bargainers , 1992 .

[9]  P. M. Garcez.  Point-Making Styles in Cross-Cultural Business Negotiation: A Microethnographic Study. , 1993 .

[10]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[12]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Restructurable representations of negotiation , 1991 .

[13]  E. Horwitz,et al.  Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety , 1986 .

[14]  Robert C. Gardner,et al.  Methods and Results in the Study of Anxiety and Language Learning: A Review of the Literature* , 1991 .

[15]  John K. Butler.  Trust Expectations, Information Sharing, Climate of Trust, and Negotiation Effectiveness and Efficiency , 1999 .

[16]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[17]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Research , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Katia Sycara,et al.  Persuasive argumentation in negotiation , 1990 .

[19]  Yuh-Show Cheng.  Learners' Beliefs and Second Language Anxiety , 2001 .