Breaking the Ivory Tower: Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences in UK and Germany

[1]  Katrin Hussinger,et al.  Commercializing academic research: the quality of faculty patenting , 2011 .

[2]  Jeannette A. Colyvas,et al.  Ubiquity and Legitimacy: Disentangling Diffusion and Institutionalization* , 2011 .

[3]  C. Haeussler.  Information-Sharing in Academia and the Industry: A Comparative Study , 2010 .

[4]  Fiona E. Murray,et al.  Does Patent Strategy Shape the Long-Run Supply of Public Knowledge? Evidence from Human Genetics , 2009 .

[5]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Specific and General Information Sharing Among Academic Scientists , 2009 .

[6]  Carolin Haeussler,et al.  The Determinants of Commercialization Strategy: Idiosyncrasies in British and German Biotechnology , 2009 .

[7]  Andrew J. Nelson.  Measuring Knowledge Spillovers: What Patents, Licenses and Publications Reveal About Innovation Diffusion , 2009 .

[8]  Jeannette A. Colyvas,et al.  Measures, metrics, and myopia: The challenges and ramifications of sustaining academic entrepreneurship , 2009 .

[9]  M. Lehrer,et al.  A national systems view of university entrepreneurialism: Inferences from comparison of the German and US experience , 2009 .

[10]  Guido Buenstorf,et al.  Is commercialization good or bad for science? Individual-level evidence from the Max Planck Society , 2009 .

[11]  B. Cortes.  Women’s work: gender equality vs hierarchy in the life sciences , 2008 .

[12]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  Divergent Paths or Stepping Stones: A Comparison of Scientists’ Advising and Founding Activities , 2008 .

[13]  Laurel Smith‐Doerr.  Decoupling Policy and Practice: How Life Scientists Respond to Ethics Education , 2008 .

[14]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Business Systems and Organizational Capabilities: The Institutional Structuring of Competitive Competences , 2008 .

[15]  Pierre Azoulay,et al.  The anatomy of medical school patenting. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  The Frontiers of Intellectual Property: Expanded Protection versus New Models of Open Science , 2007 .

[17]  Karin Hoisl,et al.  Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey , 2007 .

[18]  Mike Wright,et al.  Academic spin-offs, formal technology transfer and capital raising , 2007 .

[19]  Fiona Murray,et al.  Buying science and selling science: gender differences in the market for commercial science , 2007 .

[20]  Anne W. Fuller,et al.  Us Faculty Patenting: Inside and Outside the University , 2007 .

[21]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Innovaton and Emulation: Lessons from American Universities in Selling Private Rights to Public Knowledge , 2007 .

[22]  Daniel Lee Kleinman,et al.  Contradiction, convergence and the knowledge economy: the confluence of academic and commercial biotechnology , 2007 .

[23]  Jeannette A. Colyvas.  From divergent meanings to common practices: The early institutionalization of technology transfer in the life sciences at Stanford University , 2007 .

[24]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  WHO'S PATENTING IN THE UNIVERSITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS , 2007 .

[25]  S. Breschi,et al.  THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY OF ACADEMIC INVENTORS: NEW EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN DATA , 2007 .

[26]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  From Vulnerable to Venerated: The Institutionalization of Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences , 2007 .

[27]  Bradley T. Shaw,et al.  Universities in the Age of Corporate Science: The UC Berkeley-Novartis Controversy , 2007 .

[28]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Are patenting scientists the better scholars?: An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology , 2006 .

[29]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  Gender Differences in Patenting in the Academic Life Sciences , 2006, Science.

[30]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences1 , 2006, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  B. Sampat.  Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: The world before and after Bayh-Dole , 2006 .

[32]  A. Geuna,et al.  University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .

[33]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  The entrepreneurial puzzle: explaining the gender gap , 2006 .

[34]  S. Krimsky.  Autonomy, disinterest, and entrepreneurial science , 2006 .

[35]  Gustavo Crespi,et al.  Labour Mobility of Academic Inventors: Career Decision and Knowledge Transfer , 2006 .

[36]  Donald Tomaskovic-Devey.  Women's Work: Gender Equality vs. Hierarchy in the Life Sciences , 2005 .

[37]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Gender Patterns of Research and Licensing Activity of Science and Engineering Faculty , 2005 .

[38]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Industry funding and university professors' research performance , 2005 .

[39]  Fiona Murray,et al.  Careers and Clusters: Analyzing the Career Network Dynamic of Biotechnology Clusters , 2005 .

[40]  D. Mowery,et al.  The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University--Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments? , 2004 .

[41]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Scientific Teams and Institution Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981-1999 , 2004 .

[42]  Fiona E. Murray.  The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life , 2004 .

[43]  Alberto Di Minin,et al.  Commercializing the laboratory: the relationship between faculty patenting and publishing , 2004 .

[44]  S. Shane.  Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation , 2004 .

[45]  Mary Frank Fox,et al.  Book Review: Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes by Yu Xie and Kimberlee A. Shauman. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2003 , 2003 .

[46]  Jason Owen-Smith,et al.  From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities , 2003 .

[47]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Incentives and Invention in Universities , 2003 .

[48]  Matt L. Huffman,et al.  It's Not Only “Who You Know” that Matters , 2002 .

[49]  Fiona E. Murray.  Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering , 2002 .

[50]  Damon J. Phillips,et al.  Middle‐Status Conformity: Theoretical Restatement and Empirical Demonstration in Two Markets1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  Steven P. Vallas,et al.  Science, capitalism, and the rise of the “knowledge worker”: The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States , 2001 .

[52]  Philippe Ducor,et al.  Coauthorship and Coinventorship , 2000, Science.

[53]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  Convergence Between Europe and America: The Transition from Industrial to Innovation Policy , 1999 .

[54]  P. Hedström,et al.  Social mechanisms : an analytical approach to social theory , 1999 .

[55]  Yu Xie,et al.  Sex differences in research productivity : New evidence about an old puzzle , 1998 .

[56]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences , 1998 .

[57]  Rebecca S. Eisenberg,et al.  Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government-Sponsored Research , 1996 .

[58]  K. Packer,et al.  Patenting Culture in Science: Reinventing the Scientific Wheel of Credibility , 1996 .

[59]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Property rights and entrepreneurship in science , 1996 .

[60]  W. Dyer,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Family Business: Exploring the Connections , 1994 .

[61]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[62]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[63]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time. , 1993 .

[64]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Research Productivity over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists , 1991 .

[65]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[66]  Diana Hicks,et al.  Is big really better , 1989 .

[67]  Michael A. Stoto,et al.  Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors Among Life Scientists , 1989 .

[68]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property , 1988, Isis.

[69]  Rebecca S Eisenberg,et al.  Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research. , 1987, The Yale law journal.

[70]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[71]  P. Allison,et al.  Productivity Differences Among Scientists: Evidence for Accumulative Advantage , 1974 .

[72]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Social Stratification in Science , 1974 .

[73]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[74]  Katarina Prpic,et al.  Women in science and technology , 2009 .

[75]  Carolin Haeussler,et al.  A Comparison of Information-Sharing between Scientists in Academia and the Industry , 2009 .

[76]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  OECD Biotechnology Statistics , 2009 .

[77]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[78]  Jakob Edler,et al.  International Scientist Mobility and the Locus of Technology Transfer , 2008 .

[79]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Developing internationally comparable indicators for the commercialization of publicly-funded research , 2008 .

[80]  S. Shapin.  The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation , 2008 .

[81]  Jeannette A. Colyvas,et al.  Roads to Institutionalization: The Remaking of Boundaries between Public and Private Science , 2006 .

[82]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  OECD Biotechnology Statistics 2009 , 2006 .

[83]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  The Determinants of Faculty Patenting Behavior: Demographics or Opportunities? , 2005 .

[84]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression Models for Categorical Outcomes using Stata , 2005 .

[85]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Cooperation structure, group size and productivity in research groups , 2005, Scientometrics.

[86]  J. E. Cohen,et al.  Publication rate as a function of laboratory size in a biomedical research institution , 2005, Scientometrics.

[87]  R. Nelson.  Basic Scientific Research , 2005 .

[88]  M. M. Qurashi,et al.  Publication-rate and size of two prolific research groups in departments of inorganic chemistry at Dacca University (1944–1965) and Zoology at Karachi University (1966–84) , 2005, Scientometrics.

[89]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Clusters, networks, and innovation , 2005 .

[90]  Frans van Waarden,et al.  Innovation and institutions : a multidisciplinary review of the study of innovation systems , 2005 .

[91]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  Scientific Productivity and Group Size: A Bibliometric Analysis of Norwegian Microbiological Research , 2004, Scientometrics.

[92]  R. Whitley,et al.  Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK , 2004 .

[93]  D. Mowery,et al.  The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University–Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments? , 2004 .

[94]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[95]  Monica Gaughan,et al.  Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[96]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Careers and contradictions: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences , 2001 .

[97]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Paths of Innovation: The Institutionalization of Innovation, 1900–90 , 1998 .

[98]  R. Nelson.  National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[99]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .