Assessment of Motor Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive technique mainly used for the assessment of corticospinal tract integrity and excitability of the primary motor cortices. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) play a pivotal role in TMS studies. TMS clinical guidelines, concerning the use and interpretation of MEPs in diagnosing and monitoring corticospinal tract integrity in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), were established almost ten years ago and refer mainly to the use of TMS implementation; this comprises the magnetic stimulator connected to a standard EMG unit, with the positioning of the coil performed by using the external landmarks on the head. The aim of the present work was to conduct a narrative literature review on the MEP assessment and outcome measures in clinical and research settings, assessed by TMS Methodological characteristics of different TMS system implementations (TMS without navigation, line-navigated TMS and e-field-navigated TMS); these were discussed in the context of mapping the corticospinal tract integrity in MS. An MEP assessment of two case reports, by using an e-field-navigated TMS, was presented; the results of the correspondence between the e-field-navigated TMS with MRI, and the EDSS classifications were presented. Practical and technical guiding principles for the improvement of TMS studies in MEP assessment for MS are discussed, suggesting the use of e-field TMS assessment in the sense that it can improve the accuracy of corticospinal tract integrity testing by providing a more objective correspondence of the neurophysiological (e-field-navigated TMS) and clinical (Expanded Disability Status Scale—EDSS) classifications.

[1]  Jaakko O. Nieminen,et al.  Accuracy and precision of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2022, Journal of neural engineering.

[2]  V. Popescu,et al.  Motor evoked potentials for multiple sclerosis, a multiyear follow-up dataset , 2022, Scientific data.

[3]  A. Gharabaghi,et al.  Ipsilateral corticospinal maps correspond to severe poststroke motor impairment , 2022, Brain Stimulation.

[4]  M. Hallett,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? – A consensus and critical position paper , 2022, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  F. Hummel,et al.  An automatized method to determine latencies of motor-evoked potentials under physiological and pathophysiological conditions , 2022, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  Abstracts from the IFESS 2021 conferences. , 2022, Artificial Organs.

[7]  B. Casanova,et al.  Design and Validation of an Expanded Disability Status Scale Model in Multiple Sclerosis , 2021, European Neurology.

[8]  S. Eskildsen,et al.  Clinical, Neurophysiological, and MRI Markers of Fampridine Responsiveness in Multiple Sclerosis—An Explorative Study , 2021, Frontiers in Neurology.

[9]  M. Fattahi,et al.  Correlation between the clinical disability and T1 hypointense lesions’ volume in cerebral magnetic resonance imaging of multiple sclerosis patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2021, CNS neuroscience & therapeutics.

[10]  O. Ciccarelli,et al.  2021 MAGNIMS–CMSC–NAIMS consensus recommendations on the use of MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis , 2021, The Lancet Neurology.

[11]  D. Goodin,et al.  The nature of genetic and environmental susceptibility to multiple sclerosis , 2021, PloS one.

[12]  A. Rae-Grant,et al.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: A Review. , 2021, JAMA.

[13]  Phiroz E. Tarapore,et al.  Preoperative Applications of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2021, Frontiers in Neurology.

[14]  S. Ayache,et al.  Editorial: Corticospinal Excitability in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis , 2021, Frontiers in Neurology.

[15]  Josip Lorincz,et al.  A Novel Latency Estimation Algorithm of Motor Evoked Potential Signals , 2020, IEEE Access.

[16]  L. Leocani,et al.  Intracortical motor conduction is associated with hand dexterity in progressive multiple sclerosis , 2020, Multiple sclerosis.

[17]  P. Fuhr,et al.  Validation of Quantitative Scores Derived From Motor Evoked Potentials in the Assessment of Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Longitudinal Study , 2020, Frontiers in Neurology.

[18]  D. Centonze,et al.  Inflammation and Corticospinal Functioning in Multiple Sclerosis: A TMS Perspective , 2020, Frontiers in Neurology.

[19]  I. Zijdewind,et al.  Neurophysiological impairments in multiple sclerosis—Central and peripheral motor pathways , 2020, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[20]  Chao-Ying Chen,et al.  Ipsilateral Corticospinal Tract Excitability Contributes to the Severity of Mirror Movements in Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Case Series , 2020, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[21]  L. Leocani,et al.  Upper limb motor evoked potentials as outcome measure in progressive multiple sclerosis , 2019, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  M. Georgieff,et al.  Motor Evoked Potentials as Potential Biomarkers of Early Atypical Corticospinal Tract Development in Infants with Perinatal Stroke , 2019, Journal of clinical medicine.

[23]  Zhi-De Deng,et al.  Statistical Model of Motor Evoked Potentials for Simulation of Transcranial Magnetic and Electric Stimulation , 2018, bioRxiv.

[24]  L. Saltuari,et al.  Ipsilateral motor evoked potentials in a patient with unihemispheric cortical atrophy due to Rasmussen encephalitis , 2019, Neural regeneration research.

[25]  A. Oliviero,et al.  Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: General and Perceived Fatigue Does Not Depend on Corticospinal Tract Dysfunction , 2019, Front. Neurol..

[26]  N. Jeremy Hill,et al.  Motometrics: A Toolbox for Annotation and Efficient Analysis of Motor Evoked Potentials , 2019, Front. Neuroinform..

[27]  Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen,et al.  A principled approach to conductivity uncertainty analysis in electric field calculations , 2019, NeuroImage.

[28]  A. Brunetti,et al.  MRI features suggestive of gadolinium retention do not correlate with Expanded Disability Status Scale worsening in Multiple Sclerosis , 2019, Neuroradiology.

[29]  N. Castellanos,et al.  Cortical Excitability and Interhemispheric Connectivity in Early Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Studied With TMS-EEG , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[30]  M. Tarvainen,et al.  Oscillatory TMS-EEG-Responses as a Measure of the Cortical Excitability Threshold , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[31]  David H. Miller,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria , 2017, The Lancet Neurology.

[32]  D. Peterson,et al.  How changes in brain activity and connectivity are associated with motor performance in people with MS , 2017, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[33]  Nathalie Guyader,et al.  CortExTool: a toolbox for processing motor cortical excitability measurements by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2016 .

[34]  Bernhard Meyer,et al.  Comparison between electric-field-navigated and line-navigated TMS for cortical motor mapping in patients with brain tumors , 2016, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[35]  D. Arnold,et al.  Intracortical inhibition abnormality during the remission phase of multiple sclerosis is related to upper limb dexterity and lesions , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[36]  B. Lakhani,et al.  Multiple measures of corticospinal excitability are associated with clinical features of multiple sclerosis , 2016, Behavioural Brain Research SreeTestContent1.

[37]  J. Valls-Solé,et al.  Clinical Value of the Assessment of Changes in MEP Duration with Voluntary Contraction , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[38]  J. Lefaucheur,et al.  Impaired sleep-associated modulation of post-exercise corticomotor depression in multiple sclerosis , 2015, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[39]  J. Valls-Solé,et al.  Defective sensorimotor integration in preparation for reaction time tasks in patients with multiple sclerosis. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  S. Rossi,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  T. Scott,et al.  Relationship between Sustained Disability Progression and Functional System Scores in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of Placebo Data from Four Randomized Clinical Trials , 2015, Neuroepidemiology.

[42]  Michael Scholz,et al.  Nonphysiological factors in navigated TMS studies; Confounding covariates and valid intracortical estimates , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[43]  S. Lisanby,et al.  A Novel Model Incorporating Two Variability Sources for Describing Motor Evoked Potentials , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[44]  L. Kappos,et al.  Combined visual and motor evoked potentials predict multiple sclerosis disability after 20 years , 2014, Multiple sclerosis.

[45]  F. Sperli,et al.  A new neurophysiological approach to assess central motor conduction damage to proximal and distal muscles of lower limbs , 2014, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[46]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Spinal cord diffusion-tensor imaging and motor-evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients: microstructural and functional asymmetry. , 2013, Radiology.

[47]  A. Pearce,et al.  A Comparison of Two Methods in Acquiring Stimulus–Response Curves with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[48]  K. Rösler,et al.  The latency distribution of motor evoked potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[49]  Gerlig Widmann,et al.  Frameless stereotactic targeting devices: technical features, targeting errors and clinical results , 2012, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[50]  Anneke Steens,et al.  Mechanisms underlying muscle fatigue differ between multiple sclerosis patients and controls: A combined electrophysiological and neuroimaging study , 2012, NeuroImage.

[51]  P. Pasqualetti,et al.  W14.4 Amplitude values of motor evoked potentials: statistical properties and neurophysiological implications , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[52]  M. Ghilardi,et al.  Is central fatigue in multiple sclerosis a disorder of movement preparation? , 2011, Journal of Neurology.

[53]  A. Bartsch,et al.  Functional role of ipsilateral motor areas in multiple sclerosis , 2010, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[54]  C. Pozzilli,et al.  Intracortical excitability in patients with relapsing–remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis , 2009, Journal of Neurology.

[55]  Petro Julkunen,et al.  Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and computed electric field strength reduce stimulator-dependent differences in the motor threshold , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[56]  G. Thickbroom,et al.  Enhanced corticomotor excitability with dynamic fatiguing exercise of the lower limb in multiple sclerosis , 2008, Journal of Neurology.

[57]  P. Derambure,et al.  The effects of low- and high-frequency repetitive TMS on the input/output properties of the human corticospinal pathway , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[58]  A. Grippo,et al.  Motor evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients without walking limitation: amplitude vs. conduction time abnormalities , 2007, Journal of Neurology.

[59]  S. Tan,et al.  Intraoperative monitoring study of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials in scoliosis surgery , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[60]  G. Thickbroom,et al.  Central motor drive and perception of effort during fatigue in multiple sclerosis , 2006, Journal of Neurology.

[61]  E. Jankowska,et al.  How Can Corticospinal Tract Neurons Contribute to Ipsilateral Movements? A Question With Implications for Recovery of Motor Functions , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[62]  J. Liepert,et al.  Motor cortex excitability and fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2005, Multiple sclerosis.

[63]  C. Pozzilli,et al.  Enhanced brain motor activity in patients with MS after a single dose of 3,4-diaminopyridine , 2004, Neurology.

[64]  Gian Domenico Iannetti,et al.  Contribution of Corticospinal Tract Damage to Cortical Motor Reorganization after a Single Clinical Attack of Multiple Sclerosis , 2002, NeuroImage.

[65]  Michael Erb,et al.  Two types of ipsilateral reorganization in congenital hemiparesis: a TMS and fMRI study. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[66]  T Struffert,et al.  Error analysis in cranial neuronavigation. , 2002, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[67]  B. Meyer,et al.  Influence of pulse configuration and direction of coil current on excitatory effects of magnetic motor cortex and nerve stimulation , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[68]  M Hallett,et al.  Dissociation of the pathways mediating ipsilateral and contralateral motor‐evoked potentials in human hand and arm muscles , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[69]  S. Takeshita,et al.  Functional recovery in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: ipsilateral electromyographic responses to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1999, Brain and Development.

[70]  K. Wohlfarth,et al.  Walking and fatigue in multiple sclerosis: The role of the corticospinal system , 1998, Muscle & nerve.

[71]  Y. Maegaki,et al.  Mechanisms of central motor reorganization in pediatric hemiplegic patients. , 1997, Neuropediatrics.

[72]  C. Capaday,et al.  Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[73]  J C Rothwell,et al.  An electrophysiological study of the mechanism of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[74]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[75]  K. Chiappa,et al.  Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[76]  L M Harrison,et al.  Patterns of central motor reorganization in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[77]  L M Harrison,et al.  Plasticity of central motor pathways in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy , 1991, Neurology.

[78]  Y. Mano,et al.  Magnetic stimulation study in mirror movements , 1990, Journal of Neurology.

[79]  V. Amassian,et al.  Focal stimulation of human cerebral cortex with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[80]  J. Kurtzke.  Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[81]  Risto J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Basic Principles of Navigated TMS , 2017 .

[82]  X. Montalban,et al.  [Recommendations for the clinical use of motor evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis]. , 2013, Neurologia.

[83]  H. Freund,et al.  Reorganisation of descending motor pathways in patients after hemispherectomy and severe hemispheric lesions demonstrated by magnetic brain stimulation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[84]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Localization of the motor hand area to a knob on the precentral gyrus. A new landmark. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.