Departmental differences can point the way to improving female retention in computer science

Departmental attrition data from one state show that the difference between male and female rates of undergraduate attrition from computer science varies by institution. This analysis suggests that departmental factors are important in attrition from CS. Some CS departments inhibit female persistence at the undergraduate level while other departments promote persistence. The observed variation encourages research that compares departmental characteristics such as structure and culture, and relates them to departmental outcomes. Shifting the research focus to departmental characteristics and outcomes will identify effective methods for retaining women.

[1]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Previous Experience and the Learning of Computer Programming: The Computer Helps Those Who Help Themselves , 1988 .

[2]  A. Astin,et al.  Undergraduate science education: the impact of different college environments on the educational pip , 1992 .

[3]  Philip A. Houle,et al.  Toward Understanding Student Differences in a Computer Skills Course , 1996 .

[4]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Gender Differences in Persistence in Computer-Related Fields , 1988 .

[5]  Nancy J. Wahl,et al.  Gender differences in personality components of computer science students: a test of Holland's congruence hypothesis , 1998, SIGCSE '98.

[6]  John Konvalina,et al.  Math proficiency: a key to success for computer science students , 1983, CACM.

[7]  Thomas Hill,et al.  Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. , 1987 .

[8]  Kathy Howell The experience of women in undergraduate computer science: what does the research say? , 1993, SGCS.

[9]  Lily Shashaani Gender Differences in Computer Attitudes and Use among College Students , 1997 .

[10]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Pool Halls, Chips, and War Games: Women in the Culture of Computing , 1985 .

[11]  Jerry A. Jacobs The Sex Typing of Aspirations and Occupations: Instability during the Careers of Young Women. , 1987 .

[12]  Jesse Smith,et al.  A study of barriers to women in undergraduate computer science. , 1998, SIGCSE '98.

[13]  Janet Cottrell I'm a stranger here myself: a consideration of women in computing , 1992, SIGUCCS '92.

[14]  E. Bunderson,et al.  An Analysis of Retention Problems for Female Students in University Computer Science Programs , 1995 .

[15]  H. Lips,et al.  Majoring in computer science: Causal models for women and men , 1990 .

[16]  James C. Hearn,et al.  The Role of College Major Departments in the Reproduction of Sexual Inequality. , 1981 .

[17]  Michael W. Matier,et al.  Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions , 1994 .

[18]  T. Busch Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy and Attitudes toward Computers , 1995 .

[19]  Willie Pearson,et al.  Who will do science? : educating the next generation , 1995 .

[20]  Suzanne K. Damarin,et al.  The second self: Computers and the human spirit , 1985 .

[21]  B. Whitley Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes and Behavior: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[22]  S. M. Chambers,et al.  Gender-Based Factors in Computing Enrollments and Achievement: Evidence from a Study of Tertiary Students , 1989 .

[23]  S. Phillips,et al.  Academic Gender Bias and Women's Behavioral Agency Self‐Efficacy , 1996 .

[24]  R. Hess,et al.  Gender differences in enrollment in computer camps and classes , 1985 .