A Bayesian Approach for Modeling Cattle Movements in the United States: Scaling up a Partially Observed Network

Networks are rarely completely observed and prediction of unobserved edges is an important problem, especially in disease spread modeling where networks are used to represent the pattern of contacts. We focus on a partially observed cattle movement network in the U.S. and present a method for scaling up to a full network based on Bayesian inference, with the aim of informing epidemic disease spread models in the United States. The observed network is a 10% state stratified sample of Interstate Certificates of Veterinary Inspection that are required for interstate movement; describing approximately 20,000 movements from 47 of the contiguous states, with origins and destinations aggregated at the county level. We address how to scale up the 10% sample and predict unobserved intrastate movements based on observed movement distances. Edge prediction based on a distance kernel is not straightforward because the probability of movement does not always decline monotonically with distance due to underlying industry infrastructure. Hence, we propose a spatially explicit model where the probability of movement depends on distance, number of premises per county and historical imports of animals. Our model performs well in recapturing overall metrics of the observed network at the node level (U.S. counties), including degree centrality and betweenness; and performs better compared to randomized networks. Kernel generated movement networks also recapture observed global network metrics, including network size, transitivity, reciprocity, and assortativity better than randomized networks. In addition, predicted movements are similar to observed when aggregated at the state level (a broader geographic level relevant for policy) and are concentrated around states where key infrastructures, such as feedlots, are common. We conclude that the method generally performs well in predicting both coarse geographical patterns and network structure and is a promising method to generate full networks that incorporate the uncertainty of sampled and unobserved contacts.

[1]  S. S. Lewerin,et al.  Influence on disease spread dynamics of herd characteristics in a structured livestock industry , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[2]  A. Brix Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn , 2005 .

[3]  Marius Gilbert,et al.  Characteristics of cattle movements in Britain - an analysis of records from the Cattle Tracing System , 2005 .

[4]  M. Keeling,et al.  The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  N. Håkansson,et al.  The shape of the spatial kernel and its implications for biological invasions in patchy environments , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Rowland R Kao,et al.  Disease dynamics over very different time-scales: foot-and-mouth disease and scrapie on the network of livestock movements in the UK , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[7]  Christl A. Donnelly,et al.  Transmission intensity and impact of control policies on the foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain , 2001, Nature.

[8]  R L Sanson,et al.  A survey to investigate movements off sheep and cattle farms in New Zealand, with reference to the potential transmission of foot-and-mouth disease , 2005, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[9]  Alex Donaldson,et al.  Managing foot-and-mouth , 2001, Nature.

[10]  I. Kiss,et al.  The network of sheep movements within Great Britain: network properties and their implications for infectious disease spread , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[11]  Scott A Sisson,et al.  Estimation of distance related probability of animal movements between holdings and implications for disease spread modeling. , 2009, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[12]  Nina Håkansson,et al.  Generating Structure Specific Networks , 2010, Adv. Complex Syst..

[13]  L. Danon,et al.  Demographic structure and pathogen dynamics on the network of livestock movements in Great Britain , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  A. Barrat,et al.  Dynamical Patterns of Cattle Trade Movements , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  D. Pfeiffer,et al.  Use of social network analysis to characterize the pattern of animal movements in the initial phases of the 2001 foot and mouth disease (FMD) epidemic in the UK. , 2006, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[16]  Scott A Sisson,et al.  Bayesian analysis of animal movements related to factors at herd and between herd levels: Implications for disease spread modeling. , 2011, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[17]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  Seed Dispersal Near and Far: Patterns Across Temperate and Tropical Forests , 1999 .

[18]  N. Håkansson,et al.  Splitting the tail of the displacement kernel shows the unimportance of kurtosis. , 2008, Ecology.

[19]  J Wallinga,et al.  Mixing patterns and the spread of close-contact infectious diseases , 2006, Emerging themes in epidemiology.

[20]  C. Webb,et al.  Farm animal networks: unraveling the contact structure of the British sheep population. , 2005, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[21]  Dani Gamerman,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference , 1997 .

[22]  M. Craft,et al.  Network Models: An Underutilized Tool in Wildlife Epidemiology? , 2011, Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases.

[23]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian data analysis. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[24]  Matt J. Keeling,et al.  Representing the UK's cattle herd as static and dynamic networks , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  K. Goh,et al.  Betweenness centrality correlation in social networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Missing and spurious interactions and the reconstruction of complex networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.