Accelerating chemical start-ups in ecosystems: the need for biotopes

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to clarify the relationship between start-ups and an innovation ecosystem. Start-ups need resources available in the ecosystem to grow, but experience organizational capacity limitations during their open innovation practices. This study frames the “open innovation” interface and discloses ways to accelerate the process of connecting start-ups’ demands to ecosystem’s supplies. Design/methodology/approach A case study was used to describe the development of a conceptual ecosystem model to frame the “open innovation” interface and its subsequent implementation at nine start-up hotspots in the Dutch chemical industry. To develop the ecosystem model, the system of innovation concept was enriched with the perspective of a chemical start-up to pinpoint critical resources for growth. Findings It is suggested that the most relevant “open innovation” interface for start-ups looking to grow is an innovation biotope: a well-defined, business-oriented cross-section of an ecosystem. All stakeholders in a biotope are carefully selected based on the entrepreneurial issue at stake: they can only enter the secured marketplace if they are able to provide dedicated solutions to start-ups. The biotope enables “open innovation in a closed system” which results in acceleration of the innovation process. Originality/value This is the first study to report on the definition and implementation of an innovation biotope as the “open innovation” interface between an ecosystem and start-ups. In addition, it provides a powerful tool, the ecosystem canvas, that can help both regional and national innovation systems to visualize their ecosystem and identify blind spots.

[1]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[2]  Marco Greco,et al.  Open innovation actions and innovation performance , 2015 .

[3]  Jong de Jpj,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challenges , 2009 .

[4]  S. Kofuji,et al.  Technology and Innovation Management in Higher Education—Cases from Latin America and Europe , 2018 .

[5]  Harry Bouwman,et al.  An organizational competence model for innovation intermediaries , 2014 .

[6]  Jayshree Suresh,et al.  Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Case Study on the Influence of Environmental Factors on Entrepreneurial Success , 2012 .

[7]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[8]  J. Florin,et al.  Learning about customers: Managing B2B alliances between small technology startups and industry leaders , 2013 .

[9]  B. Dankbaar,et al.  Industry–science collaboration for radical innovation: the discovery of phase-dependent collaborative configurations , 2015 .

[10]  B. Gray,et al.  Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration , 1991 .

[11]  Susan L. Cohen What Do Accelerators Do? Insights from Incubators and Angels , 2013, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[12]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  Muppets and Gazelles: Political and Methodological Biases in Entrepreneurship Research , 2013 .

[13]  Paul D. Reynolds,et al.  Executive forum: A study of informal investing in 29 nations composing the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor , 2003 .

[14]  C. Mason,et al.  ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEMS AND GROWTH ORIENTED ENTREPRENEURSHIP , 2014 .

[15]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Everything in Its Place: Entrepreneurship and the Strategic Management of Cities, Regions, and States , 2015 .

[16]  Richard A. Hunt,et al.  Entrepreneurial Tweaking: An Empirical Study of Technology Diffusion Through Secondary Inventions and Design Modifications by Start-Ups , 2012 .

[17]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  Management of "technology push" development projects , 2004, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[18]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation , 2006 .

[19]  Stefanie Bröring,et al.  Organising new business development: open innovation at Degussa , 2008 .

[20]  Robert Rosen,et al.  The NASA technology push towards future space mission systems , 1989 .

[21]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Top‐down, bottom‐up, or both? Toward an integrative perspective on operations strategy formation , 2014 .

[22]  G. Rao,et al.  Open Innovation , 2019, Strategic Decisions.

[23]  Douglas Henton,et al.  The dynamics of Silicon Valley: Creative destruction and the evolution of the innovation habitat , 2013 .

[24]  B. Flyvbjerg Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[25]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[26]  S. Yami,et al.  Critical growth factors of ICT start‐ups , 2007 .

[27]  Amber R. Stiles,et al.  Intellectual Property in Consumer Electronics, Software and Technology Startups , 2013 .

[28]  O. Dedehayir,et al.  A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: a research agenda , 2019, European Journal of Innovation Management.

[29]  D. Isenberg How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution , 2010 .

[30]  H. Spiess Value Creation Strategies for the Chemical Industry , 2006 .

[31]  J. West,et al.  Open Innovation: The Next Decade , 2014 .

[32]  Geert Vissers,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Way of Knowledge Transfer? , 2007 .

[33]  John E. Core,et al.  Do Independent Directors Cause Improvements in Firm Transparency? , 2013 .

[34]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Industry Effects and Strategic Management Research , 1990 .

[35]  A. Salter,et al.  Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .

[36]  Frank de Langen,et al.  Critical Success Factors of the Survival of Start-Ups with a Radical Innovation , 2012 .

[37]  N. Rosenberg,et al.  The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth , 2015 .

[38]  Gabriel Linton,et al.  Business mating: when start-ups get it right , 2013 .

[39]  Ll Corominas,et al.  Wastewater nitrogen removal in Sbrs, applying a step-feed strategy: from lab-scale to pilot-plant operation. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[40]  M.J.G.M. van Gils,et al.  Selecting the right channel for knowledge transfer between industry and science: Consider the R&D‐activity , 2009 .

[41]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  An Overview of Innovation , 2009 .

[42]  Ljiljana Božić,et al.  The antecedents of SME innovativeness in an emerging transition economy , 2009 .

[43]  M. Grimaldi,et al.  Enabling Open Innovation in Small and Medium Enterprises: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach , 2013 .

[44]  Yusuf Chisti,et al.  Biotechnology-a sustainable alternative for chemical industry. , 2005, Biotechnology advances.

[45]  Ross Brown,et al.  Trigger points and high-growth firms: A conceptualisation and review of public policy implications , 2013 .

[46]  Ksenia Podoynitsyna,et al.  Success Factors in New Ventures: A Meta-analysis , 2007 .

[47]  K. Scott Swan,et al.  A Product and Process Model of the Technology-Sourcing Decision , 2003 .

[48]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[49]  J. F. Moore,et al.  Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[50]  G. O'Connor,et al.  The human side of radical innovation , 2004 .

[51]  Bob Johnstone,et al.  Business plan , 1990, Nature.

[52]  Dirk Czarnitzki,et al.  Biomedical Academic Entrepreneurship Through the Sbir Program , 2005 .

[53]  S. Brunswicker,et al.  Open Innovation in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises (SMEs): External Knowledge Sourcing Strategies and Internal Organizational Facilitators , 2015 .

[54]  M. Baucus,et al.  Idea or Prime Opportunity? A Framework for Evaluating Business Ideas for New and Small Ventures , 2004 .

[55]  Pier A. Abetti,et al.  Critical Success Factors for Radical Technological Innovation: A Five Case Study , 2000 .