Computing with Realizational Morphology

The theory of realizational morphology presented by Stump in his influential book Inflectional Morphology (2001) describes the derivation of inflected surface forms from underlying lexical forms by means of ordered blocks of realization rules. The theory presents a rich formalism for expressing generalizations about phenomena commonly found in the morphological systems of natural languages. This paper demonstrates that, in spite of the apparent complexity of Stump's formalism, the system as a whole is no more powerful than a collection of regular relations. Consequently, a Stump-style description of the morphology of a particular language such as Lingala or Bulgarian can be compiled into a finite-state transducer that maps the underlying lexical representations directly into the corresponding surface forms or forms, and vice versa, yielding a single lexical transducer. For illustration we will present an explicit finite-state implementation of an analysis of Lingala based on Stump's description and other sources.

[1]  Lauri Karttunen,et al.  Finite State Morphology , 2003, CSLI Studies in Computational Linguistics.

[2]  Lauri Karttunen,et al.  The Proper Treatment of Optimality in Computational Phonology , 1998, ArXiv.

[3]  L. Karttunen Finite-state Constraints , 1993 .

[4]  Stephen R. Anderson,et al.  A-Morphous morphology , 1992 .

[5]  George Anton Kiraz,et al.  Multitiered nonlinear morphology using multitape finite automata: a case study on Syriac and Arabic , 2000, CL.

[6]  Arnold M. Zwicky,et al.  How to Describe Inflection , 1985 .

[7]  Jason Eisner,et al.  Phonological Comprehension and the Compilation of Optimality Theory , 2002, ACL.

[8]  C. Douglas Johnson,et al.  Formal Aspects of Phonological Description , 1972 .

[9]  Kimmo Koskenniemi,et al.  A General Computational Model for Word-Form Recognition and Production , 1984, ACL.

[10]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[11]  Gregory Stump,et al.  Inflectional Morphology: Conclusions, extensions, and alternatives , 2001 .

[12]  Kenneth R. Beesley,et al.  Arabic Morphology Using Only Finite-State Operations , 1998, SEMITIC@COLING.

[13]  Martin Kay,et al.  Regular Models of Phonological Rule Systems , 1994, CL.

[14]  P. Matthews Inflectional Morphology: A Theoretical Study Based on Aspects of Latin Verb Conjugation , 1972 .

[15]  Kimmo Koskenniemi,et al.  A General Computational Model for Word-Form Recognition and Production , 1984 .

[16]  Raphael A. Finkel,et al.  Generating Hebrew Verb Morphology by Default Inheritance Hierarchies , 2002, SEMITIC@ACL.

[17]  Lauri Karttunen,et al.  Finite-State Non-Concatenative Morphotactics , 2000, ACL.