Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

We conducted a comprehensive systematic review of the literature on volumetric parameters and a meta-analysis of the prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed using the key words PET, head and neck, and volume. Inclusion criteria were 18F-FDG PET used as an initial imaging tool; studies limited to HNC; patients who had not undergone surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy before PET scans; and studies reporting survival data. Event-free survival and overall survival were considered markers of outcome. The impact of MTV or TLG on survival was measured by the effect size hazard ratio (HR). Data from each study were analyzed using Review Manager. Results: Thirteen studies comprising 1,180 patients were included in this study. The combined HR for adverse events was 3.06 (2.33–4.01, P < 0.00001) with MTV and 3.10 (2.27–4.24, P < 0.00001) with TLG, meaning that tumors with high volumetric parameters were associated with progression or recurrence. Regarding overall survival, the pooled HR was 3.51 (2.62–4.72, P < 0.00001) with MTV and 3.14 (2.24–4.40, P < 0.00001) with TLG. There was no evidence of significant statistical heterogeneity at an I2 of 0%. Conclusion: MTV and TLG are prognostic predictors of outcome in patients with HNC. Despite clinically heterogeneous HNC and the various methods adopted between studies, we can confirm that patients with a high MTV or TLG have a higher risk of adverse events or death.

[1]  Xiaomin Li,et al.  Standardized uptake value is of prognostic value for outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma , 2010, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[2]  Su Jin Lee,et al.  Prognostic Value of Volume-Based 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT Parameters in Patients with Clinically Node-Negative Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2012, Korean journal of radiology.

[3]  Ngan-Ming Tsang,et al.  Prognostic Significance of 18F-FDG PET Parameters and Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Load in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Xiao-dong Zhu,et al.  Accuracy of whole‐body PET and PET‐CT in initial M staging of head and neck cancer: A meta‐analysis , 2011, Head & neck.

[5]  L. Kong,et al.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET-CT metabolic index for nasopharyngeal carcinoma , 2010, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[6]  S. Yang,et al.  Use of pretreatment metabolic tumour volumes to predict the outcome of pharyngeal cancer treated by definitive radiotherapy , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[7]  T. Miller,et al.  Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant therapy by quantitative 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose with positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal cancer. , 2002, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[8]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  W. Sauerbrei,et al.  Dangers of using "optimal" cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  Qianying Zhao,et al.  Prognostic Value of Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography or PET-Computed Tomography in Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis , 2013, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[11]  R. Subramaniam,et al.  PET-based primary tumor volumetric parameters and survival of patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  S. Hyun,et al.  Prognostic Significance of Volume-Based PET Parameters in Cancer Patients , 2012, Korean journal of radiology.

[13]  L. Quekel,et al.  CT and 18F-FDG PET for noninvasive detection of splenic involvement in patients with malignant lymphoma. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Jeong Hyun Lee,et al.  Prognostic Value of Preoperative Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis Measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT in Salivary Gland Carcinomas , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Shixi Liu,et al.  18FDG PET and PET‐CT for the detection of bone metastases in patients with head and neck cancer. A meta‐analysis , 2013, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[16]  S. Kannan,et al.  Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[17]  Jeon Yeob Jang,et al.  Metabolic Tumor Volume of [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Predicts Short-Term Outcome to Radiotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy in Pharyngeal Cancer , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[18]  Chun-Ta Liao,et al.  Total lesion glycolysis: a possible new prognostic parameter in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. , 2013, Oral oncology.

[19]  Yongkui Lu,et al.  18FDG-PET/CT for the detection of regional nodal metastasis in patients with primary head and neck cancer before treatment: a meta-analysis. , 2013, Surgical oncology.

[20]  Dong Soo Lee,et al.  Recent Trends in PET Image Interpretations Using Volumetric and Texture-based Quantification Methods in Nuclear Oncology , 2014, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[21]  J. Roh,et al.  Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT in advanced-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[22]  Peter Smeets,et al.  Predictive and prognostic value of metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis in solid tumours , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[23]  C. McConkey,et al.  A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the role of positron emission tomography in the follow up of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma following radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy , 2008, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[24]  H. Quon,et al.  FDG-PET/CT imaging biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. , 2012, Imaging in medicine.

[25]  Rathan M. Subramaniam,et al.  18F-FDG Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Glycolytic Activity of Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Cancer: Adding Value to Clinical Staging , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  N. Lee,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis Predict Outcome in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  T. Yen,et al.  Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET parameters in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: predictive role for different survival endpoints and impact on prognostic stratification , 2011, Nuclear medicine communications.

[28]  T. Turkington,et al.  Analysis of pretreatment FDG-PET SUV parameters in head-and-neck cancer: tumor SUVmean has superior prognostic value. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  Stefan Michiels,et al.  Meta-analysis when only the median survival times are known: A comparison with individual patient data results , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[30]  H. Jang,et al.  FDG-PET/CT as prognostic factor and surveillance tool for postoperative radiation recurrence in locally advanced head and neck cancer , 2011, Radiation oncology journal.

[31]  Guo-zeng Xu,et al.  Comparison of whole body positron emission tomography (PET)/PET‐computed tomography and conventional anatomic imaging for detecting distant malignancies in patients with head and neck cancer: A meta‐analysis , 2012, The Laryngoscope.

[32]  W. Thorstad,et al.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET metabolic parameters in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma , 2013, Journal of Radiation Oncology.

[33]  Shu-qi Wu,et al.  Prognostic significance of SUV on PET/CT in patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2009, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[34]  Jinming Yu,et al.  18F-FDG PET or PET-CT to evaluate prognosis for head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis , 2011, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[35]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography to Evaluate Cervical Node Metastases in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis , 2008 .

[36]  M. Parmar,et al.  Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.