VERTICAL SPECIALIZATION AND INDUSTRY STRUCTURE IN HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES

We examine the evolution of vertical specialization in three industries: chemicals, computers, and semiconductors. Vertical specialization is the restructuring of industry-wide value chains, such that different stages are controlled by different firms, rather than being vertically integrated within the boundaries of individual firms. In some cases, vertical specialization may span international boundaries and is associated with complex international production networks. After decades of vertical specialization, firms in the chemical industry are re-integrating stages of the value chain. By contrast, the semiconductor and computer industries have experienced significant vertical specialization during the past ten years. We examine how and why these contrasting trends in vertical specialization have co-evolved with industry maturation and decline, and underscore the importance and role of both industry factors and business strategies necessary for industries to become more specialized. We also consider the effects of vertical specialization on the sources of innovation and the geographic redistribution of production and other activities. We conclude that the evolution of vertical specialization in these three industries has both reflected and influenced the strategies of leading firms, while also displays industry-specific characteristics that are rooted in different technological and market characteristics.

[1]  Raja Roy,et al.  INCUMBENT SURVIVAL DURING MARKET FUSION IN MATURED INDUSTRIES: THE INFLUENCE OF COMPONENT AND ARCHITECTURAL CAPABILITIES ON THE SURVIVAL OF U.S. MACHINE TOOL MANUFACTURERS DURING 1975–1995 , 2004 .

[2]  Kei-Mu Yi,et al.  Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade? , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[4]  G. Stigler.  The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market , 1951, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  David C. Mowery,et al.  The international computer software industry : a comparative study of industry evolution and structure , 1996 .

[6]  E. Fama.  Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[7]  H. Thorelli.  Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies , 1986 .

[8]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[9]  Philip M. Marcus,et al.  The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business , 1979 .

[10]  Anita M. McGahan,et al.  Business strategy over the industry life cycle , 2004 .

[11]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Chemicals and long-term economic growth : insights from the chemical industry , 1998 .

[12]  Joel West,et al.  The international computer software industry: A comparative study of industry evolution and structure , 1997 .

[13]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[14]  John S. Fryer.  The Production and Application of New Industrial Technology , 1977 .

[15]  William F. Furter,et al.  A Century of chemical engineering , 1982 .

[16]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[17]  N. Rosenberg.  Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910 , 1963, The Journal of Economic History.

[18]  O. Williamson.  Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations , 1979, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[19]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  COPING WITH DECLINE IN DYNAMIC MARKETS: CORPORATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND THE RECOMBINATIVE ORGANIZATIONAL FORM , 2004 .

[20]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  The Development Factory: Unlocking the Potential of Process Innovation , 1996 .

[21]  R. Langlois.  The Vanishing Hand: The Changing Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism , 2001 .

[22]  A. Chandler,et al.  Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism , 1991 .

[23]  A. Shepherd,et al.  Semiconductors , 1967, Nature.

[24]  Timothy J. Sturgeon,et al.  Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization , 2002 .

[25]  D. Mowery,et al.  Managing the Development and Transfer of Process Technologies in the Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry , 1996 .

[26]  O. Williamson.  The economic institutions of capitalism , 1985 .

[27]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[28]  P. G. Conti.  The Development of the chemical Industry , 1926 .

[29]  Ernest Braun,et al.  The Semiconductor Industry. (Book Reviews: Revolution in Miniature. The History and Impact of Semiconductor Electronics) , 1978 .

[30]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  THEORY OF THE FIRM: MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR, AGENCY COSTS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE , 1976 .

[31]  David Hummels,et al.  The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade , 1999 .

[32]  David C. Mowery.  Sources of Industrial Leadership: The Computer Software Industry , 1999 .

[33]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Managing in the modular age : architectures, networks, and organizations , 2002 .

[34]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[35]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[36]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Reversal of Fortune? The Recovery of the U.S. Semiconductor Industry , 1998 .

[37]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Industrial Dynamics and the Evolution of Firms' and Nations' Competitive Capabilities in the World Computer Industry , 1997 .

[38]  Philip M. Marcus,et al.  The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business , 1979 .

[39]  D. Teece.  Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation☆ , 1996 .

[40]  Derek R. White,et al.  When and When Not to Vertically Integrate , 1993 .

[41]  R. Langlois.  Modularity in technology and organization , 2002 .

[42]  Ashish Arora,et al.  The Market for Technology in the Chemical Industry : Causes and Consequences , 2000 .

[43]  O. Williamson.  / STRATEGIZING, ECONOMIZING, AND ECONOMIC ORGANIZATION , 1991 .

[44]  Richard N. Langlois,et al.  Capabilities and Vertical Disintegration in Process Technology: The Case of Semiconductor Fabrication Equipment , 1994 .

[45]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry , 2003 .

[46]  Martha M. Trescott,et al.  Unit Operations in the Chemical Industry: An American Innovation in Modern Chemical Engineering , 1982 .

[47]  R. Langlois.  Transaction-cost Economics in Real Time , 1992 .

[48]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities , 2001 .

[49]  Dana Rapoport,et al.  Vertical Specialization and the Changing Nature of World Trade , 1998 .

[50]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[51]  W. E. Steinmueller,et al.  The U.S. software industry : an analysis and interpretative history , 1995 .

[52]  Robert C. Feenstra,et al.  Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy , 1998 .

[53]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[54]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  Knowledge Specialisation and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More Than They Do? , 2001 .

[55]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[56]  Stephen E. Thomsen,et al.  Scale and scope: the dynamics of industrial capitalism , 1992 .

[57]  O. Granstrand,et al.  Multi-Technology Corporations: Why They Have “Distributed” Rather Than “Distinctive Core” Competencies , 1997 .

[58]  R. Langlois,et al.  Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries , 1992 .

[59]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  When is Virtual Virtuous? Organizing for Innovation , 1999 .

[60]  Fb Timothy,et al.  General Purpose Technologies:Engines of Growth? Journal of Econometrics, . , 1995 .

[61]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[62]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th-Century America , 1998 .

[63]  David C. Mowery,et al.  e-Business and Disintegration of the Semiconductor Industry Value Chain , 2002 .

[64]  Ada Scupola,et al.  The impact of electronic commerce on industry structure - the case of scientific, technical and medical publishing , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[65]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[66]  A. Arora,et al.  Specialized technology suppliers, international spillovers and investment: evidence from the chemical industry , 2001 .

[67]  Richard A. D'Aveni,et al.  Economies of Integration Versus Bureaucracy Costs: Does Vertical Integration Improve Performance? , 1994 .

[68]  Kirk Monteverde.  Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry , 1995 .

[69]  George Westerman,et al.  Disruption, disintegration and the dissipation of differentiability , 2002 .

[70]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .