The role of industry infrastructure in telehealth innovations: a multi-level analysis of a telestroke program

The information-intensive nature of the healthcare industry and the potential of information technology (IT) to reduce costs and improve quality of services have increased the focus on IT-based innovations. Yet, our ability to understand and manage how IT-based innovations unfold in the context of healthcare is still limited. In this paper, we apply Van de Ven's industry infrastructure framework to investigate a telehealth innovation that provides remote medical assistance to stroke patients in a network of collaborating hospitals. The resulting multi-level analysis contributes to understanding the innovation by revealing a highly complex process of interactions between key stakeholders and healthcare industry infrastructure. Despite the innovation's strong potential, the process is mainly push-driven with minimal pull from potential adopters. Moreover, the push is created by a small group of medical innovators with limited technological and financial resources and little infrastructural support. The study contributes with contextual insights into the telehealth innovation, suggesting complementary explanations of why the healthcare industry despite considerable investments continues to lag behind other industries in adoption of IT-based innovations. The study also adapts Van de Ven's framework by applying it to a single case of innovation rather than as originally conceived to several instances of an innovation within an industry. The analysis shows how some of the components of the framework were adapted to and interpreted in the context of telehealth innovations.

[1]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[2]  Wullianallur Raghupathi,et al.  Health care information systems , 1997, CACM.

[3]  Jos Aarts,et al.  Organizational issues in health informatics: a model approach , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[4]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[5]  David L. Paul,et al.  Collaborative Activities in Virtual Settings: A Knowledge Management Perspective of Telemedicine , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Peter Wegner,et al.  Why interaction is more powerful than algorithms , 1997, CACM.

[8]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Web-based intervention support system for health promotion , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Michael I. Barrett,et al.  Negotiating ICT development and use: The case of a telemedicine system in the healthcare region of Crete , 2006, Inf. Organ..

[10]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[11]  Rajeev K. Bali,et al.  Towards gestalt telehealth: considering social, ethical and cultural issues , 2001, Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering 2001. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8555).

[12]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Interpersonal Traits, Complementarity, and Trust in Virtual Collaboration , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Nirup M. Menon,et al.  Productivity of Information Systems in the Healthcare Industry , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Editorial: Telemedicine Nomenclature: What Does It Mean? , 2000 .

[15]  Fuster The american stroke association : A division of the american heart association , 1999, Stroke.

[16]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Analyzing genre of organizational communication in clinical information systems , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[17]  James G. Anderson,et al.  Clearing the way for physicians' use of clinical information systems , 1997, CACM.

[18]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  The Dialectics of Resilience: A Multilevel Analysis of a Telehealth Innovation , 2006, The Transfer and Diffusion of Information Technology for Organizational Resilience.

[19]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Pushing the contextual envelope: developing and diffusing IS theory for health information systems research , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[20]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Taking Industry Seriously in Information Systems Research , 2005, MIS Q..

[21]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  Managing knowledge in distributed projects , 2004, CACM.

[22]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  The significance of context in information systems and organizational change , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[23]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Technology implementation for telemedicine programs , 2004, CACM.

[24]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[25]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Dialectics of resilience: a multi-level analysis of a telehealth innovation , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[26]  A. Stinchcombe Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[27]  Nancy M. Lorenzi,et al.  Review: Antecedents of the People and Organizational Aspects of Medical Informatics: Review of the Literature , 1997, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[28]  Marc Berg,et al.  Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[29]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Running in Packs to Develop Knowledge-Intensive Technologies , 2005, MIS Q..

[30]  Rob Kling,et al.  Organizational Dimensions of Effective Digital Library Use: Closed Rational and Open Natural Systems Models , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[31]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[32]  Victor Wacham A. Mbarika,et al.  Is telemedicine the panacea for Sub-Saharan Africa's medical nightmare? , 2004, CACM.

[33]  Olumide Sunday Adewale,et al.  An internet-based telemedicine system in Nigeria , 2004, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[34]  P. Whitten,et al.  E-Health, telehealth, and telemedicine : a guide to start-up and success , 2001 .

[35]  David L. Paul,et al.  A Field of Study of the Effect of Interpersonal Trust on Virtual Collaborative Relationship Performance , 2004, MIS Q..

[36]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Information technology and the transformation of industries: three research perspectives , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Nancy M. Lorenzi,et al.  Organizational ISSUES=change , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[38]  Rob Kling,et al.  Informational Environments: Organizational Contexts of Online Information Use , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[39]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[40]  Suzanne Iacono,et al.  Knowledge barriers to diffusion of telemedicine , 1998, ICIS '98.