K-12 Engineering Outreach: Design Decisions, Rationales, and Applications

Even though engineering outreach to K-12 schools initially seemed to be a simple undertaking, it proved to require complex design solutions related to a variety of issues. The purpose of this design case is to tell the story of our National Science Foundation (NSF) supported engineering outreach project, that took place between the years of 2007-2013. The design problem of this project started with the issue of how to design the engineering instruction, what to provide within the K-12 instruction, how to conduct the outreach, and how to overcome physical limitations of school sites. This design case captures the design process, context, various designs of the computer-mediated learning platform, and the rationales for design iterations. We also describe how the design team, which included experts in instructional design, electrical engineering, and educational psychology, as well as carpenters, teachers, and graphic designers, worked together to accomplish an outreach project that reached over 3,600 K-12 students. In addition to the design processes, we also report the major findings from our evaluation studies of the intructional modules delivered to K-12 students, and how we used these results to iterate and refine our module designs.

[1]  P. Pintrich Motivation and Classroom Learning , 2003 .

[2]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations , 2009 .

[3]  Barbara L. McCombs,et al.  How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education. , 1998 .

[4]  Eric Jamet,et al.  Attention guiding in multimedia learning , 2008 .

[5]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Representation sequencing in computer-based engineering education , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[7]  R. Moreno,et al.  Do Multiple Representations Need Explanations? The Role of Verbal Guidance and Individual Differences in Multimedia Mathematics Learning , 2004 .

[8]  Marsha Ing,et al.  Gender Differences in the Consistency of Middle School Students' Interest in Engineering and Science Careers. , 2014 .

[9]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia-Supported Metaphors for Meaning Making in Mathematics , 1999 .

[10]  Mahmudur Rahman,et al.  A concept inventory for an Electric Circuits course : Rationale and fundamental topics , 2010, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[11]  Shannon K. Gilmartin,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTEREST IN PHYSICAL SCIENCE/ENGINEERING, SCIENCE CLASS EXPERIENCES, AND FAMILY CONTEXTS: VARIATIONS BY GENDER AND RACE/ETHNICITY AMONG SECONDARY STUDENTS , 2006 .

[12]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Coherence Formation when Learning from Text and Pictures: What Kind of Support for Whom? , 2009 .

[13]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Using Virtual Peers to Guide Visual Attention During Learning , 2010, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[14]  Larry Ambrose,et al.  The power of feedback. , 2002, Healthcare executive.

[15]  John Sweller,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: The Split-Attention Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[16]  Martha W. Alibali,et al.  Building Cohesion Across Representations: A Mechanism for STEM Integration , 2013 .

[17]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Optimizing Worked‐Example Instruction in Electrical Engineering: The Role of Fading and Feedback during Problem‐Solving Practice , 2009 .

[18]  R. Moreno Optimising learning from animations by minimising cognitive load: cognitive and affective consequences of signalling and segmentation methods , 2007 .

[19]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  D. R. Billings,et al.  Efficacy of Adaptive Feedback Strategies in Simulation-Based Training , 2012 .

[21]  Emily R. Fyfe,et al.  “Concreteness fading” promotes transfer of mathematical knowledge , 2012 .

[22]  Micah S. Stohlmann,et al.  Modeling in Engineering: The Role of Representational Fluency in Students' Conceptual Understanding , 2013 .

[23]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Just-in-time information presentation: Improving learning a troubleshooting skill. , 2006 .

[24]  G. Olympiou,et al.  Physical versus Virtual Manipulative Experimentation in Physics Learning. , 2011 .

[25]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The Expertise Reversal Effect , 2003 .

[26]  L. Katehi,et al.  Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. , 2009 .

[27]  Jacquelynne S Eccles,et al.  Studying gender and ethnic differences in participation in math, physical science, and information technology. , 2005, New directions for child and adolescent development.

[28]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Pedagogical Agent Signaling of Multiple Visual Engineering Representations: The Case of the Young Female Agent , 2013 .

[29]  R. Mayer,et al.  Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments , 2007 .

[30]  S. Ainsworth DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Learning with Multiple Representations. , 2006 .

[31]  R. Mayer,et al.  Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening , 2002 .

[32]  R. Moreno Decreasing Cognitive Load for Novice Students: Effects of Explanatory versus Corrective Feedback in Discovery-Based Multimedia , 2004 .

[33]  James C. Lester,et al.  The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents? , 2001 .

[34]  R. Mayer,et al.  A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. , 2000 .

[35]  R. Mayer,et al.  Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game , 2005 .

[36]  Rolf Ploetzner,et al.  What contributes to the split-attention effect? The role of text segmentation, picture labelling, and spatial proximity , 2010 .

[37]  R. Mayer,et al.  Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments , 2004 .

[38]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Technological Literacy Learning With Cumulative and Stepwise Integration of Equations Into Electrical Circuit Diagrams , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[39]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[40]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Teaching with Concrete and Abstract Visual Representations: Effects on Students' Problem Solving, Problem Representations, and Learning Perceptions. , 2011 .

[41]  Paul Ginns Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects , 2006 .

[42]  E. Tulving,et al.  Episodic and semantic memory , 1972 .

[43]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators , 2006 .

[44]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Supporting multimedia learning with visual signalling and animated pedagogical agent: moderating effects of prior knowledge , 2015, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[45]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[46]  G. Clarebout,et al.  Do pedagogical agents make a difference to student motivation and learning , 2011 .

[47]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional Design in Technical Areas , 1999 .

[48]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Introductory Circuit Analysis Learning From Abstract and Contextualized Circuit Representations: Effects of Diagram Labels , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[49]  A. L. Baylor,et al.  A Social-Cognitive Framework for Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions , 2006 .

[50]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Transitional feedback schedules during computer-based problem-solving practice , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[51]  T. Jong,et al.  Supporting students' learning with multiple representations in a dynamic simulation-based learning environment , 2006 .

[52]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[53]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[54]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Circuits Kit K–12 Outreach: Impact of Circuit Element Representation and Student Gender , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[55]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. , 2001 .

[56]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Pre‐college Electrical Engineering Instruction: The Impact of Abstract vs. Contextualized Representation and Practice on Learning , 2010 .

[57]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Learning from abstract and contextualized representations: The effect of verbal guidance , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[58]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[59]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Color Coding of Circuit Quantities in Introductory Circuit Analysis Instruction , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[60]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[61]  C. Atman,et al.  Gender and Ethnicity Differences in Freshmen Engineering Student Attitudes: A Cross‐Institutional Study * , 2001 .

[62]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. , 1990 .

[63]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Learning in complex domains: When and why do multiple representations help? , 2003 .

[64]  Brent K. Jesiek,et al.  Conceptual Gaps in Circuits Textbooks: A Comparative Study , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[65]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Helping Students Understand Challenging Topics in Science Through Ontology Training , 2006 .

[66]  R. A. Tarmizi,et al.  Guidance during Mathematical Problem Solving. , 1988 .