Creating bigger problems: grand challenges as boundary objects and the legitimacy of the information systems field

The impact of a discipline's research is constrained by its ability to articulate compelling problems. Well-crafted problems are the foundation for mobilizing the effort, resources, and attention essential to scientific progress and broader impact. We argue that Information Systems (IS) scholars, individually and collectively, must develop the practice of articulating and engaging large-scale, broad scope problems – or grand challenges. To support this position, we examine the role and value of grand challenge efforts in science and engineering based on a theory of grand challenges as socially constructed boundary objects. Conceptualizing grand challenges in these terms implies strategies and approaches for magnifying the impact of IS research by engaging these types of problems.

[1]  E Marshall,et al.  A History of the Human Genome Project , 2001, Science.

[2]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems : the state of the field , 2006 .

[3]  Ping Wang,et al.  Chasing the Hottest IT: Effects of Information Technology Fashion on Organizations , 2010, MIS Q..

[4]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Nothing At The Center?: Academic Legitimacy in the Information Systems Field , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Jerry N. Luftman.  Key Issues for IT Executives 2004 , 2005, MIS Q. Executive.

[6]  J. Swales.  Research Genres: Explorations and Applications , 2004 .

[7]  Gordon Ellis,et al.  Grand challenges for engineering , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[8]  Mark Weiss,et al.  Social, Behavioral and Economic Research in the Federal Context , 2009 .

[9]  M. Crawford.  The Human Genome Project. , 1990, Human biology.

[10]  M V Olson,et al.  The human genome project. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key issues in information systems management , 1987 .

[12]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[13]  Robin Milner,et al.  Grand Challenges for Computing Research , 2005, Comput. J..

[14]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Boundary Objects in Design: An Ecological View of Design Artifacts , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[16]  F. Collins,et al.  The Human Genome Project: Lessons from Large-Scale Biology , 2003, Science.

[17]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings , 1993 .

[18]  P A Singer,et al.  Grand Challenges in Global Health , 2003, Science.

[19]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Key Issues for IT Executives , 2004, MIS Q. Executive.

[20]  Douglass Post,et al.  The Future of Computing Performance , 2011, Comput. Sci. Eng..

[21]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Fashion Waves in Information Systems Research and Practice , 2009, MIS Q..

[22]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key Issues in Information Systems Management: 1994-95 SIM Delphi Results , 1996, MIS Q..

[23]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..