THE ROLE OF RACE AND ETHNICITY IN PAROLE DECISIONS

The parole board plays an integral part in the reentry of offenders into the community from prison in most states; yet, little is known about the decision-making practices of this group. In particular, few studies have used quantitative data to examine parole among a large group of offenders, and less is known about the direct and joint effects of race and ethnicity on this decision point. We extend previous work by considering variation in parole timing among a sample of young, serious offenders incarcerated in one state. Results from a series of proportional hazard models reveal substantial variation in parole timing. Consistent with the existing theoretical research on parole, parole actors are most concerned with community protection and heavily weigh measures of the current offense, institutional behavior, and the official parole guidelines score. The direct effects of race and ethnicity were also revealed. Black offenders spent a longer time in prison awaiting parole compared with white offenders, and the racial and ethnic differences are maintained net of legal and individual demographic and community characteristics. These findings provide important insight into the parole process and augment the existing theoretical work on disparities in decision making.

[1]  Christina DeJong.  SURVIVAL ANALYSIS AND SPECIFIC DETERRENCE: INTEGRATING THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL MODELS OF RECIDIVISM* , 1997 .

[2]  Kathryn D. Morgan,et al.  The Effect of Victim Participation on Parole Decisions: Results From a Southeastern State , 1997 .

[3]  C. Britt.  Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions , 2000 .

[4]  Jonathan Simon,et al.  The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications , 1992 .

[5]  William D. Bales,et al.  RACE, ETHNICITY, THREAT AND THE LABELING OF CONVICTED FELONS* , 2005 .

[6]  R. Gainey,et al.  MODELING THE EFFECTS OF LEGALLY RELEVANT AND EXTRALEGAL FACTORS UNDER SENTENCING GUIDELINES: THE RULES HAVE CHANGED , 2000 .

[7]  Richard L. Wiener,et al.  Evaluation, diagnosis, and prediction in parole decision making. , 1982 .

[8]  Gray Cavender,et al.  Strange Interlude: An Analysis of Juvenile Parole Revocation Decision Making , 1992 .

[9]  Mike Maguire,et al.  Dangerousness and the Tariff: The Decision-Making Process in Release from Life Sentences , 1984 .

[10]  C. Sellers,et al.  Responding to a legislated change in correctional practices: A quasi-experimental study of revocation hearings and parole board actions , 1990 .

[11]  J. L. Proctor.  THE “NEW PAROLE”: AN ANALYSIS OF PAROLE BOARD DECISION MAKING AS A FUNCTION OF ELIGIBILITY , 1999 .

[12]  Timothy S. Bynum,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF PAROLE DECISION MAKING USING A SAMPLE OF SEX OFFENDERS: A FOCAL CONCERNS , 2006 .

[13]  John S. Carroll,et al.  Causal attributions in expert parole decisions. , 1978 .

[14]  John Hagan,et al.  Changing Conceptions of Race: Toward an Account of Anomalous Findings of Sentencing Research , 1984 .

[15]  Darrell J. Steffensmeier,et al.  Ethnicity and Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is Punished More Harshly? , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[16]  C. Spohn,et al.  Race and disparities in sentencing: A test of the liberation hypothesis , 1991 .

[17]  Lynette Feder.  Psychiatric history, due procedural safeguards, and the use of discretion in the criminal justice process , 1995 .

[18]  R. Kingsnorth.  Decision-Making in a Parole Bureaucracy , 1969 .

[19]  J. Carroll,et al.  Evaluation and Prediction in Expert Parole Decisions , 1990 .

[20]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. , 1997, Science.

[21]  Celesta A. Albonetti.  An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. , 1991 .

[22]  G. Kleck,et al.  RACE, RACIAL THREAT, AND SENTENCING OF HABITUAL OFFENDERS* , 1998 .

[23]  D. Steffensmeier,et al.  GENDER AND IMPRISONMENT DECISIONS , 1993 .

[24]  Jeffery T. Ulmer,et al.  COURT COMMUNITIES UNDER SENTENCING GUIDELINES: DILEMMAS OF FORMAL RATIONALITY AND SENTENCING DISPARITY , 1996 .

[25]  L. Post,et al.  The Impact of Race on the Adjudication of Sexual Assault and other Violent Crimes , 2003 .

[26]  E. Metchik.  Parole Decisionmaking: A Comparative Analysis , 1988 .

[27]  B. Johnson.  CONTEXTUAL DISPARITIES IN GUIDELINES DEPARTURES: COURTROOM SOCIAL CONTEXTS, GUIDELINES COMPLIANCE, AND EXTRALEGAL DISPARITIES IN CRIMINAL SENTENCING1 , 2005 .

[28]  John A. Conley,et al.  Decision Making by a Part-Time Parole Board , 1982 .

[29]  B. Johnson,et al.  SENTENCING IN CONTEXT: A MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[30]  Ojmarrh Mitchell,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Race and Sentencing Research: Explaining the Inconsistencies , 2005 .

[31]  Cassia Spohn,et al.  THE IMPRISONMENT PENALTY PAID BY YOUNG, UNEMPLOYED BLACK AND HISPANIC MALE OFFENDERS , 2000 .

[32]  Jon'a F. Meyer.  STRANGE SCIENCE: SUBJECTIVE CRITERIA IN PAROLE DECISIONS , 2001 .

[33]  Eric A. Stewart,et al.  Predicting Who Reoffends: The Neglected Role of Neighborhood Context in Recidivism Studies , 2006 .

[34]  Leo Carroll,et al.  Racial Bias in the Decision to Grant Parole , 1976 .

[35]  D. Glaser.  Who Gets Probation and Parole: Case Study Versus Actuarial Decision Making , 1985 .

[36]  J. Payne,et al.  Crime seriousness, recidivism risk, and causal attributions in judgments of prison term by students and experts. , 1977 .

[37]  S. Steen,et al.  Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders : Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms , 1998 .

[38]  Joseph E. Scott.  The Use of Discretion in Determininig the Severity of Punishment for Incarcerated Offenders , 1974 .

[39]  Marjorie S. Zatz.  The Changing Forms of Racial/Ethnic Biases in Sentencing , 1987 .

[40]  Jeffery T. Ulmer,et al.  VARIATION IN TRIAL PENALTIES AMONG SERIOUS VIOLENT OFFENSES , 2006 .

[41]  Lisa Frohmann,et al.  Convictability and discordant locales: Reproducing race, class, and gender ideologies in prosecutorial decisionmaking. , 1997 .

[42]  Darnell F. Hawkins,et al.  Perceptions of punishment for crime , 1980 .

[43]  William H. Parsonage,et al.  Victim Impact Testimony and Pennsylvania's Parole Decision Making Process: A Pilot Study* , 1992 .

[44]  D. Steffensmeier,et al.  Judges' Race and Judicial Decision Making: Do Black Judges Sentence Differently? , 2001 .

[45]  D. Cox.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[46]  D. Steffensmeier,et al.  ETHNICITY AND JUDGES' SENTENCING DECISIONS: HISPANIC‐BLACK‐WHITE COMPARISONS , 2001 .

[47]  Vernetta D. Young.  Gender expectations and their impact on black female offenders and victims , 1986 .

[48]  S. Klein,et al.  Race and imprisonment decisions in California. , 1990, Science.

[49]  Darrell J. Steffensmeier,et al.  The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male , 1998 .

[50]  J. Heinz,et al.  Sentencing by Parole Board: An Evaluation , 1976 .

[51]  Bruce Western,et al.  The Impact of Incarceration on Wage Mobility and Inequality , 2002, American Sociological Review.

[52]  Stewart J. D'alessio,et al.  A MULTILEVEL TEST OF RACIAL THREAT THEORY , 2004 .

[53]  J. H. Kramer,et al.  Race and Imprisonment Decisions , 1993, The American Court System.

[54]  Carolyn Turpin-Petrosino.  Are limiting enactments effective? an experimental test of decision making in a presumptive parole state , 1999 .

[55]  Celesta A. Albonetti.  Sentencing under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Effects of Defendant Characteristics, Guilty Pleas, and Departures on Sentence Outcomes for Drug Offenses, 1991-1992 , 1997 .