Do-It-Yourself Empowerment as Experienced by Novice Makers with Disabilities

Recent HCI research has highlighted the potential afforded by maker technologies for supporting new forms of DIY Assistive Technology (DIY-AT) for people with disabilities. Furthermore, the popular discourse surrounding both the maker movement and disability is one of democratisation and empowerment. Despite this, critics argue that maker movement membership lacks diversity and that within DIY-AT, it is seldom the people with disabilities who are creating such designs. We conducted a qualitative study that explored how people with disabilities experience the empowering potential of making. We analysed online videos by makers with disabilities and conducted fieldwork at two makerspaces. These informed the design of DIY-Abilities, a series of workshops for people with disabilities in which participants could learn different maker technologies and complete their own maker project. Through analysis of participants' narratives we contribute a new perspective on the specific social and material capacities of accessible maker initiatives.

[1]  Amy Hurst,et al.  Investigating the Implications of 3D Printing in Special Education , 2016, ACM Trans. Access. Comput..

[2]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[3]  David Lang.  Zero to Maker: Learn (Just Enough) to Make (Just About) Anything , 2013 .

[4]  Dan Goodley,et al.  Disability and Impairment , 2017 .

[5]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  Helping Hands: Requirements for a Prototyping Methodology for Upper-limb Prosthetics Users , 2016, CHI.

[6]  Nick Taylor,et al.  Making Community: The Wider Role of Makerspaces in Public Life , 2016, CHI.

[7]  Megan Strickfaden,et al.  ‘Scripting’ – Personal Narratives in the Designing of Artefacts , 2004 .

[8]  Angelo Torre.  Making a Community , 2007 .

[9]  Carol Thomas,et al.  Theorising disability and chronic illness: Where next for perspectives in medical sociology? , 2012 .

[10]  D. Marks,et al.  Models of disability. , 1997, Disability and rehabilitation.

[11]  Gillian R. Hayes,et al.  Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology , 2010, ASSETS '10.

[12]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures , 2010, NordiCHI.

[13]  J. G. Tanenbaum,et al.  Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice , 2013, CHI.

[14]  Cristiano Storni.  A personal perspective on research through design , 2015, Interactions.

[15]  Lisa Anthony,et al.  Analyzing user-generated youtube videos to understand touchscreen use by people with motor impairments , 2013, CHI.

[16]  T. Ingold.  Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture , 2013 .

[17]  Amy Hurst,et al.  Coming to grips: 3D printing for accessibility , 2014, ASSETS.

[18]  Jonathan Bean,et al.  Making: movement or brand? , 2014, INTR.

[19]  Charles Goldman.  Making the Making , 2001 .

[20]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Empowering products: personal identity through the act of appropriation , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[21]  Colin Barnes,et al.  A working social model? Disability, work and disability politics in the 21st century , 2000 .

[22]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[23]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  An Intimate Laboratory?: Prostheses as a Tool for Experimenting with Identity and Normalcy , 2016, CHI.

[24]  Luc Geurts,et al.  Empowering Occupational Therapists with a DIY-toolkit for Smart Soft Objects , 2015, TEI.

[25]  K. Hogan,et al.  The Use and Abuse of Models of Disability , 2000 .

[26]  Amy Hurst,et al.  Sharing is Caring: Assistive Technology Designs on Thingiverse , 2015, CHI.

[27]  Ana Bê.  Feminism and disability: a cartography of multiplicity , 2013 .

[28]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Sustainable Making? Balancing Optimism and Criticism in HCI Discourse , 2015, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[29]  Marie Johnston,et al.  Models of disability , 1996 .

[30]  M Wagner.  "Does he take sugar?". , 1991, World health forum.

[31]  Angela Greiling Keane.  COMING TO GRIPS , 2003 .

[32]  Christopher Frauenberger.  Rethinking autism and technology , 2015, Interactions.

[33]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  A study of the challenges related to DIY assistive technology in the context of children with disabilities , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[34]  Cristiano Storni,et al.  The problem of de-sign as conjuring: empowerment-in-use and the politics of seams , 2014, PDC.

[35]  Amy Hurst,et al.  Making "making" accessible , 2013, IDC.

[36]  Nick Watson,et al.  Moral wrongs, disadvantages, and disability: a critique of critical disability studies , 2014 .

[37]  Margot Brereton,et al.  A Collaborative Approach to Design Individualized Technologies with People with a Disability , 2015, OZCHI.

[38]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  "We've conquered dark": shedding light on empowerment in critical making , 2014, NordiCHI.

[39]  Rosemarie Garland-Thomson,et al.  Misfits: A Feminist Materialist Disability Concept , 2011, Hypatia.

[40]  Catarina Mota,et al.  The rise of personal fabrication , 2011, C&C '11.

[41]  Berth Danermark *,et al.  Social justice: redistribution and recognition—a non‐reductionist perspective on disability , 2004 .

[42]  Lynn Dombrowski,et al.  Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[43]  Colin Barnes,et al.  Understanding the social model of disability , 2012, Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies.

[44]  PaulosEric.  The rise of the expert amateur , 2013 .

[45]  Christopher Frauenberger,et al.  Disability and Technology: A Critical Realist Perspective , 2015, ASSETS.

[46]  Philip E. Agre,et al.  From high tech to human tech: Empowerment, measurement, and social studies of computing , 1994, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[47]  Rikke Toft Nørgård,et al.  Sharing is Caring , 2017, EuroPLoP.

[48]  P. Olivier,et al.  Empathy, participatory design and people with dementia , 2012, CHI.

[49]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Making cultures: empowerment, participation, and democracy - or not? , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[50]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Does he take sugar?: moving beyond the rhetoric of compassion , 2013, INTR.

[51]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Designing with people with disabilities: adapting best practices of DIY and organizational approaches , 2014, OZCHI.

[52]  Brian Pinkstone.  Coming to Grips , 1998 .

[53]  D. Dunn,et al.  Person-first and identity-first language: Developing psychologists' cultural competence using disability language. , 2015, The American psychologist.

[54]  Christopher Frauenberger,et al.  In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[55]  Amy Hurst,et al.  Empowering individuals with do-it-yourself assistive technology , 2011, ASSETS.

[56]  Simon Brisenden,et al.  Independent Living and the Medical Model of Disability , 1986 .

[57]  David Cuartielles,et al.  Conversations on making , 2015, Interactions.

[58]  Leah Buechley,et al.  Do-it-yourself cellphones: an investigation into the possibilities and limits of high-tech diy , 2014, CHI.

[59]  Claus Bossen,et al.  User gains and PD aims: assessment from a participatory design project , 2010, PDC '10.

[60]  A. Paton,et al.  Helping hands. , 1988, Postgraduate medical journal.

[61]  Hafeni Mthoko,et al.  Assessing outcome and impact: towards a comprehensive evaluation approach in ICT4D , 2015, ICTD '15.

[62]  Claartje L. ter Hoeven,et al.  “Sharing is caring”: Corporate social responsibility awareness explaining the relationship of information flow with affective commitment , 2013 .

[63]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples , 2011, TACC.

[64]  Margrit Shildrick.  Critical Disability Studies , 2012 .

[65]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Ability-based design , 2018, Commun. ACM.

[66]  J. Gregory.  Scandinavian Approaches to Participatory Design , 2003 .