Views of managed care--a survey of students, residents, faculty, and deans at medical schools in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS Views of managed care among academic physicians and medical students in the United States are not well known. In 1997, we conducted a telephone survey of a national sample of medical students (506 respondents), residents (494), faculty members (728), department chairs (186), directors of residency training in internal medicine and pediatrics (143), and deans (105) at U.S. medical schools to determine their experiences in and perspectives on managed care. The overall rate of response was 80.1 percent. RESULTS Respondents rated their attitudes toward managed care on a 0-to-10 scale, with 0 defined as "as negative as possible" and 10 as "as positive as possible." The expressed attitudes toward managed care were negative, ranging from a low mean (+/-SD) score of 3.9+/-1.7 for residents to a high of 5.0+/-1.3 for deans. When asked about specific aspects of care, fee-for-service medicine was rated better than managed care in terms of access (by 80.2 percent of respondents), minimizing ethical conflicts (74.8 percent), and the quality of the doctor-patient relationship (70.6 percent). With respect to the continuity of care, 52.0 percent of respondents preferred fee-for-service medicine, and 29.3 percent preferred managed care. For care at the end of life, 49.1 percent preferred fee-for-service medicine, and 20.5 percent preferred managed care. With respect to care for patients with chronic illness, 41.8 percent preferred fee-for-service care, and 30.8 percent preferred managed care. Faculty members, residency-training directors, and department chairs responded that managed care had reduced the time they had available for research (63.1 percent agreed) and teaching (58.9 percent) and had reduced their income (55.8 percent). Overall, 46.6 percent of faculty members, 26.7 percent of residency-training directors, and 42.7 percent of department chairs reported that the message they delivered to students about managed care was negative. CONCLUSIONS Negative views of managed care are widespread among medical students, residents, faculty members, and medical school deans.

[1]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[2]  R. Reece The American health care system--managed care. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  E. Korn,et al.  Hypothesis Testing with Complex Survey Data: The Use of Classical Quadratic Test Statistics with Particular Reference to Regression Problems , 1993 .

[4]  S. Wartman Managed care and its effect on residency training in internal medicine. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[5]  L. Rawls,et al.  Health care reform and graduate medical education. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  M. Wilkes,et al.  Entering first‐year medical students' attitudes toward managed care , 1994, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[7]  F. Hafferty,et al.  The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education , 1994, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[8]  L. Goldman,et al.  The academic health care system. Preserving the missions as the paradigm shifts. , 1995, JAMA.

[9]  Hans C. Jessen,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression Analysis , 1996 .

[10]  R. Culbertson How successfully can academic faculty practices compete in developing managed care markets? , 1996, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  D. Nash,et al.  Medical student education in managed care settings: beyond HMOs. , 1996, JAMA.

[12]  E. Campbell,et al.  Relationship between market competition and the activities and attitudes of medical school faculty. , 1997, JAMA.

[13]  J. Iglehart Forum on the future of academic medicine: Session II--Finances and culture. , 1997, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[14]  J. Dessens,et al.  STATISTICAL MODELS FOR ORDINAL VARIABLES. Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences 4. Clifford C. Clogg and Edward S. Shihadeh, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 1994. No. of pages: xiii+192. Price: £26.50. ISBN: 0‐8039‐3676‐1 , 1997 .

[15]  H Pardes,et al.  The future of medical schools and teaching hospitals in the era of managed care , 1997, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[16]  W. D. White,et al.  The effect of managed care on the incomes of primary care and specialty physicians. , 1998, Health services research.

[17]  J. A. Calvin Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1998 .