Detection in Sensor Networks: The Saddlepoint Approximation

This paper presents a computationally simple and accurate method to compute the error probabilities in decentralized detection in sensor networks. The cost of the direct computation of these probabilities-e.g., the probability of false alarm, the probability of a miss, or the average error probability-is combinatorial in the number of sensors and becomes infeasible even with small size networks. The method is based on the theory of large deviations, in particular, the saddlepoint approximation and applies to generic parallel fusion sensor networks, including networks with nonidentical sensors, nonidentical observations, and unreliable communication links. The paper demonstrates with parallel fusion sensor network problems the accuracy of the saddlepoint methodology: 1) computing the detection performance for a variety of small and large sensor network scenarios; and 2) designing the local detection thresholds. Elsewhere, we have used the saddlepoint approximation to study tradeoffs among parameters for networks of arbitrary size

[1]  James G. Booth,et al.  On the Validity of Edgeworth and Saddlepoint Approximations , 1994 .

[2]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Distributed Bayesian signal detection , 1989, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  John B. Thomas,et al.  Optimum Quantization for Local Decision Based on Independent Samples , 1977 .

[4]  Nils Sandell,et al.  Detection with Distributed Sensors , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[5]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Decision fusion in a wireless sensor network with a large number of sensors , 2004 .

[6]  Saleem A. Kassam,et al.  Optimum Quantization for Signal Detection , 1977, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[7]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Extremal properties of likelihood-ratio quantizers , 1993, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[8]  John E. Kolassa,et al.  Series Approximation Methods in Statistics , 1994 .

[9]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Channel aware decision fusion in wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[10]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Distributed detection with multiple sensors I. Fundamentals , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[11]  Adrian Papamarcou,et al.  Asymptotic Optimality of Likelihood Ratio Threshold Tests in Decentralized Detection , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Yu Hen Hu,et al.  Detection, classification, and tracking of targets , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[13]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  An approach to the design of distributed Bayesian detection structures , 1991, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Decentralized detection by a large number of sensors , 1988, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[15]  Nancy Reid,et al.  Saddlepoint Methods and Statistical Inference , 1988 .

[16]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  Distributed detection with multiple sensors I. Advanced topics , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[17]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  Decentralized detection in sensor networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[18]  Hakan Deliç,et al.  Fundamental structures and asymptotic performance criteria in decentralized binary hypothesis testing , 1995, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[19]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Randomized data selection in detection with applications to distributed signal processing , 2003, Proc. IEEE.

[20]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Near-optimum quantization for signal detection , 1996, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[21]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Distributed Detection and Data Fusion , 1996 .

[22]  Ramanarayanan Viswanathan,et al.  Optimal distributed decision fusion , 1989 .

[23]  H. E. Daniels,et al.  Tail Probability Approximations , 1987 .

[24]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  Saddlepoint approximation for sensor network optimization , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[25]  Peter Willett,et al.  The suboptimality of randomized tests in distributed and quantized detection systems , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.