Empirical and numerical approaches for geomechanical characterization of coal seam reservoirs

Abstract The effects of fractures or joints on geomechanical properties of coal when transitioning from small samples to larger field scales have long been recognized. Two geomechanical characterization methodologies for of a coal seam for reservoir engineering are presented which attempt to account for these scale effect. The first is a well established empirical rock mass classification method, the Geological Strength Index (GSI). The second is a newly developed numerical technique, termed the Synthetic Rock Mass (SRM). GSI was developed to empirically account for the influence of rock joint density and joint surface conditions on the behaviour of the rock mass. The established GSI to strength and deformation theories are reviewed and an approach to account for joint stiffness based on the minimum confining stress is presented. The SRM approach to jointed rock mass geomechanical characterization is a numerical modeling technique which combines the Bonded Particle Model for rock and Discrete Fracture Network simulation. The intact or matrix of the SRM is calibrated to laboratory data, the DFN inserted creating a numerical representation of the rock mass which can then be tested at any scale. In each case, the approaches attempt to geomechanically characterize (strength, modulus, etc) the large scale behaviour of the coal seam, where the properties can then be used for continuum type simulation (reservoir simulation, borehole stability, etc).

[1]  Kurt Douglas,et al.  The shear strength of rock masses , 2002 .

[2]  E. Hoek,et al.  Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus , 2006 .

[3]  E. T. Brown,et al.  A study of the mechanical behaviour of coal for pillar design , 1998 .

[4]  R. P. Young,et al.  Simulating acoustic emissions in bonded-particle models of rock , 2000 .

[5]  P. K. Kaiser,et al.  TIME-DEPENDENT DEFORMATION OF SMALL TUNNELS - II. TYPICAL TEST DATA , 1981 .

[6]  Z. T. Bieniawski,et al.  The significance of in situ tests on large rock specimens , 1975 .

[7]  Terrence Paul Medhurst.  Estimation of the in situ strength and deformability of coal for engineering design , 1996 .

[8]  J. P. Henry,et al.  Laboratory investigation of the mechanical behaviour of Tournemire shale , 1997 .

[9]  J. McLennan,et al.  STATIC AND DYNAMIC TESTING OF COAL SPECIMENS , 1991 .

[10]  N. Morgenstern,et al.  PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODEL FOR ROCK WITH TIME-DEPENDENT STRENGTH , 1981 .

[11]  Rick Chalaturnyk,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Stress and Strain Due to Gas Sorption/Desorption and Their Effects on In Situ Permeability of Coalbeds , 2006 .

[12]  P. K. Kaiser,et al.  Deformation of small tunnelsIV. Behaviour during failure , 1985 .

[13]  C. D. Hawkes,et al.  Assessing the mechanical stability of horizontal boreholes in coal , 2007 .

[14]  R. P. Young,et al.  Moment tensors and micromechanical models , 2002 .

[15]  P. Cundall,et al.  A bonded-particle model for rock , 2004 .

[16]  P. A. Cundall,et al.  A Synthetic Rock Mass Model For Jointed Rock , 2007 .

[17]  A. Szwilski.  Determination of the anisotropic elastic moduli of coal , 1984 .

[18]  R. P. Young,et al.  Dynamic modelling of induced seismicity , 2004 .

[19]  Evert Hoek,et al.  Practical estimates of rock mass strength , 1997 .

[20]  A. I. Sofianos,et al.  A correlation of four rock mass classification systems through their fabric indices , 2007 .

[21]  Eui-Seob Park,et al.  Simulation of the Mechanical Behavior of Discontinuous Rock Masses Using a Bonded-particle Model , 2004 .

[22]  Nathan Deisman,et al.  Unconventional geomechanical testing on coal for coalbed reservoir well design: The Alberta Foothills and Plains , 2008 .

[23]  C. Martin,et al.  A clumped particle model for rock , 2007 .

[24]  Idar Larsen,et al.  Comparison between controlled laboratory experiments and discrete particle simulations of the mechanical behaviour of rock , 2005 .

[25]  Pinnaduwa Kulatilake,et al.  Physical and particle flow modeling of jointed rock block behavior under uniaxial loading , 2001 .

[26]  Evert Hoek,et al.  Variability of the engineering properties of rock masses quantified by the geological strength index: the case of ophiolites with special emphasis on tunnelling , 2006 .

[27]  Nathan Deisman,et al.  Geomechanical properties and permeability of coals from the Foothills and Mountain regions of western Canada , 2007 .

[28]  F. Gu,et al.  Analysis of Coalbed Methane Production by Reservoir and Geomechanical Coupling Simulation , 2005 .

[29]  W. Gunter,et al.  Deep coalbed methane in Alberta, Canada: A fuel resource with the potential of zero greenhouse gas emissions , 1997 .

[30]  J. Hadjigeorgiou,et al.  Rock mass characterization for underground hard rock mines , 1998 .