Structural health monitoring with statistical methods during progressive damage test of S101 Bridge

For the last decades vibration based damage detection of engineering structures has become an important issue for maintenance operations on transport infrastructure. Research in vibration based structural damage detection has been rapidly expanding from classic modal parameter estimation to modern operational monitoring. Since structures are subject to unknown ambient excitation in operation conditions, all estimates from the finite data measurements are of statistical nature. The intrinsic uncertainty due to finite data length, colored noise, non-stationary excitations, model order reduction or other operational influences needs to be considered for robust and automated structural health monitoring methods. In this paper, two subspace-based methods are considered that take these statistical uncertainties into account, first modal parameter and their confidence interval estimation for a direct comparison of the structural states, and second a statistical null space based damage detection test that completely avoids the identification step. The performance of both methods is evaluated on a large scale progressive damage test of a prestressed concrete road bridge, the S101 Bridge in Austria. In an on-site test, ambient vibration data of the S101 Bridge was recorded while different damage scenarios were introduced on the bridge as a benchmark for damage identification. It is shown that the proposed damage detection methodology is able to clearly indicate the presence of structural damage, if the damage leads to a change of the structural system.

[1]  Brit Colditz Brückenertüchtigung – eine notwendige Voraussetzung für ein zuverlässiges Fernstraßennetz , 2013 .

[2]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Uncertainty bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic subspace identification , 2008 .

[3]  Pizhong Qiao,et al.  Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods: A Review and Comparative Study , 2011 .

[4]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Nonstationary Consistency of Subspace Methods , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[5]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Vibration Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures , 1993 .

[6]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Subspace Identification for Linear Systems: Theory ― Implementation ― Applications , 2011 .

[7]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  REFERENCE-BASED STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION FOR OUTPUT-ONLY MODAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[8]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Fully automated (operational) modal analysis , 2012 .

[9]  Jürgen Grünberg,et al.  Ermüdungsbeanspruchungen von Betonbrücken unter zunehmendem Schwerverkehr , 2007 .

[10]  Michèle Basseville,et al.  Subspace-based fault detection algorithms for vibration monitoring , 2000, Autom..

[11]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Subspace-based damage detection under changes in the ambient excitation statistics , 2014 .

[12]  David A. Nix,et al.  Vibration–based structural damage identification , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  J M W Brownjohn,et al.  Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Efficient Multi-Order Uncertainty Computation for Stochastic Subspace Identification , 2013 .

[15]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Robust output-only modal identification and monitoring of buildings in the presence of dynamic interactions for rapid post-earthquake emergency management , 2012 .

[16]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Merging Sensor Data from Multiple Temperature Scenarios for Vibration Monitoring of Civil Structures , 2008 .

[17]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Monitoring historical masonry structures with operational modal analysis: Two case studies , 2007 .

[18]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Robust Fault Detection With Statistical Uncertainty in Identified Parameters , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[19]  L. Mevel,et al.  Statistical model-based damage detection and localization: subspace-based residuals and damage-to-noise sensitivity ratios , 2004 .

[20]  A. Benveniste,et al.  Single sample modal identification of a nonstationary stochastic process , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[21]  L. Mevel,et al.  Fast multi-order computation of system matrices in subspace-based system identification ☆ , 2012 .

[22]  Jyrki Kullaa,et al.  DAMAGE DETECTION OF THE Z24 BRIDGE USING CONTROL CHARTS , 2003 .

[23]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Uncertainty quantification for modal parameters from stochastic subspace identification on multi-setup measurements ☆ , 2013 .

[24]  Rob B. Polder,et al.  Non‐traditional assessment and maintenance methods for aging concrete structures – technical and non‐technical issues , 2012 .

[25]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Dynamic monitoring of a long span arch bridge , 2008 .

[26]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Vibration based structural health monitoring of an arch bridge: From automated OMA to damage detection , 2012 .

[27]  E. Peter Carden,et al.  Vibration Based Condition Monitoring: A Review , 2004 .

[28]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[29]  Mohiuddin A Khan,et al.  Bridge and Highway Structure Rehabilitation and Repair , 2010 .