Interpretation of Slug and Packer Tests in Anisotropic Aquifers

Slug and packer tests provide data for determining the local value of hydraulic conductivity in aquifers. However, most techniques commonly used for test interpretation disregard any anisotropy of the tested formation. Using dimensional analysis, an extension of available methods for interpretation of slug and packer tests to anisotropic conditions is developed. The technique is a transformation of the radial dimension via the well radius, and involves dividing the true well radius by the square root of the anisotropy ratio which must be specified a priori. This technique can be applied to formulae, computer programs, graphs, or tabulated data available for confined or unconfined isotropic conditions. It also reduces the number of computer computations. As an example, the technique is used to extend the Bouwer and Rice (1976) method, which was developed for isotropic conditions, to anisotropic conditions. A comparison of the Bouwer and Rice (1976) method corrected for anisotropy, with the Widdowson et al. (1990) method, yields horizontal hydraulic conductivities differing by 8% (in one typical case). Ignoring anisotropy for the same case results in a 44% underestimation of horizontal conductivity.

[1]  J. D. Bredehoeft,et al.  Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Paper No. H-21 , 1966 .

[2]  S. P. Neuman Analysis of Pumping Test Data From Anisotropic Unconfined Aquifers Considering Delayed Gravity Response , 1975 .

[3]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOLUTIONS OF FLOW PROBLEMS IN ISOTROPIC AND ANISOTROPIC SOILS , 1965 .

[4]  F. Molz,et al.  Multilevel Slug Tests with Comparisons to Tracer Data , 1991 .

[5]  Jonathan D. Istok,et al.  Aquifer Testing: Design and Analysis of Pumping and Slug Tests , 1991 .

[6]  K. Hayashi,et al.  A new method for the determination of in situ hydraulic properties by pressure pulse tests and application to the Higashi Hachimantai Geothermal Field , 1987 .

[7]  Roger Thunvik,et al.  Determination of formation permeability by double-packer tests , 1984 .

[8]  Z. J. Kabala,et al.  The dipole flow test: A new single‐borehole test for aquifer characterization , 1993 .

[9]  F. Molz,et al.  Aquifer Testing for Thermal Energy Storage , 2013 .

[10]  H. Bouwer,et al.  A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells , 1976 .

[11]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  A note on packer, slug, and recovery tests in unconfined aquifers , 1978 .

[12]  V. Zlotnik,et al.  Groundwater flow in a compressible unconfined aquifer with uniform circular recharge , 1992 .

[13]  Fred J. Molz,et al.  An Analysis Technique for Multilevel and Partially Penetrating Slug Test Data , 1990 .

[14]  J. Bear Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media , 1975 .

[15]  G. Dagan,et al.  A Method of Determining the Permeability and Effective Porosity of Unconfined Anisotropie Aquifers , 1967 .