The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis

Decades of research in social and political psychology have demonstrated that political conservatives appear more intolerant toward a variety of groups than do political liberals. Recent work from our three independent labs has challenged this conventional wisdom by suggesting that some of the psychological underpinnings of intolerance are not exclusive to people on either end of the political spectrum. These studies have demonstrated that liberals and conservatives express similar levels of intolerance toward ideologically dissimilar and threatening groups. We suggest directions for future research and discuss the psychological and political implications of our conclusions.

[1]  Christopher W. Bauman,et al.  Moral Conviction and Political Engagement , 2008 .

[2]  Linda J. Skitka,et al.  Avoiding the Pitfalls of Politicized Psychology , 2003 .

[3]  Thomas R. Cain,et al.  Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation differentially predict biased evaluations of media reports , 2013 .

[4]  M. Inzlicht,et al.  Understanding all inconsistency compensation as a palliative response to violated expectations , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  John R. Chambers,et al.  Why Do I Hate Thee? Conflict Misperceptions and Intergroup Mistrust , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[6]  J. Sullivan,et al.  The Sources of Political Tolerance: A Multivariate Analysis , 1981, American Political Science Review.

[7]  A. Chasteen,et al.  Perceptions of Disadvantage Versus Conventionality: Political Values and Attitudes Toward the Elderly Versus Blacks , 1997 .

[8]  Larry M. Bartels.  Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions , 2002 .

[9]  Jarret T. Crawford,et al.  Political Intolerance, Right and Left , 2014 .

[10]  Charles S. Taber,et al.  Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs , 2006 .

[11]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Ideology and Prejudice , 2013, Psychological science.

[12]  Yoel Inbar,et al.  Political Diversity in Social and Personality Psychology , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[13]  J. Sidanius,et al.  Racism, ideology, and affirmative action revisited: the antecedents and consequences of "principled objections" to affirmative action. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  J. Sullivan,et al.  Political Intolerance and the Structure of Mass Attitudes , 1984 .

[15]  J. Dessalles,et al.  Arguing, reasoning, and the interpersonal (cultural) functions of human consciousness , 2011, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  Michelle K. Ryan,et al.  Does personality explain in-group identification and discrimination? Evidence from the minimal group paradigm. , 2007, The British journal of social psychology.

[17]  Christine Reyna,et al.  Value Judgments: The Impact of Perceived Value Violations on American Political Attitudes , 2007 .

[18]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  J. Gibson.  Enigmas of Intolerance: Fifty Years after Stouffer's Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties , 2006, Perspectives on Politics.

[20]  Dan M. Kahan,et al.  Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection , 2013, Judgment and Decision Making.

[21]  Christine Reyna,et al.  Examining the principles in principled conservatism: the role of responsibility stereotypes as cues for deservingness in racial policy decisions. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Gordon Hodson,et al.  Bright Minds and Dark Attitudes , 2012, Psychological science.

[23]  M. Brandt,et al.  Discrimination Across the Ideological Divide , 2013 .

[24]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Thomas D. Griffin,et al.  Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Jaime L. Napier,et al.  Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  Edward G. Sargis,et al.  Moral conviction: another contributor to attitude strength or something more? , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  L. Skitka,et al.  When Values and Attributions Collide: Liberals’ and Conservatives’ Values Motivate Attributions for Alleged Misdeeds , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[29]  Bleeding Hearts and the Heartless: Popular Perceptions of Liberal and Conservative Ideologies , 2000 .

[30]  Kevin B Smith,et al.  Disgust, politics, and responses to threat , 2014, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  Jarret T. Crawford.  The ideologically objectionable premise model: Predicting biased political judgments on the left and right , 2012 .

[32]  Chris G. Sibley,et al.  Prejudice : A Meta-Analysis and Theoretical Review , 2008 .

[33]  K. Fiedler.  Voodoo Correlations Are Everywhere—Not Only in Neuroscience , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[34]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Dennis Chong,et al.  Similarities and Differences Between Left-Wing and Right-Wing Radicals , 1985, British Journal of Political Science.

[36]  Jarret T. Crawford,et al.  Predicting Political Biases Against the Occupy Wall Street and Tea Party Movements , 2015 .