Graphemes as Motor Units in the Acquisition of Writing Skills

This study examined whether the graphemic structure of words modulates the timing of handwriting production during the acquisition of writing skills. This is particularly important during the acquisition period because phonological recoding skills are determinant in the elaboration of orthographic representations. First graders wrote seven-letter bi-syllabic words on a digitiser. We measured movement duration and fluency and evaluated reading performance. In Experiment 1, the words varied in number of graphemes and grapheme structure. In Experiment 2, the words varied in graphemic structure but the number of graphemes was held constant. The results revealed that the children wrote the first syllable of the words grapheme-by-grapheme, irrespective of the number of letters that composed them. They prepared the movement to produce the first grapheme before starting to write. The following graphemes were processed on-line. They then prepared the movement to write the second syllable. The progressive decrease of duration and dysfluency values towards the end of the word indicates that the children prepared the entire syllable in advance. Movement time and dysfluency measures presented very similar patterns in the two experiments. Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between reading performance and handwriting measures. The grapheme and syllable structure of the words therefore modulates the timing of motor production during handwriting acquisition. Once the children have learned the phonological recoding rules, they apply them systematically, irrespectively of the size of the graphemes they have to write.

[1]  André Porquet,et al.  L'orthographe française , 1966 .

[2]  C. K. Yuen,et al.  Theory and Application of Digital Signal Processing , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[3]  M. Coltheart Lexical access in simple reading tasks , 1978 .

[4]  A. Wing The height of handwriting , 1980 .

[5]  A. Thomassen,et al.  Preparation of partly precued handwriting movements: The size of movement units in handwriting , 1983 .

[6]  G. V. Galen,et al.  On the Simultaneous Processing of Words, Letters and Strokes in Handwriting: Evidence For a Mixed Linear and Parallel Model , 1986 .

[7]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Movement Analysis of Repetitive Writing Behaviour of First, Second and Third Grade Primary School Children , 1986 .

[8]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The role of the Graphemic Buffer in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia , 1987, Cognition.

[9]  James A. Reggia,et al.  Empirically derived probabilities for grapheme-to-phoneme correspondences in english , 1987 .

[10]  Monique Radeau,et al.  Données statistiques sur la structure orthographique du francais , 1988 .

[11]  G. V. Galen,et al.  The Acquisition of Skilled Handwriting: Discontinuous Trends in Kinematic Variables , 1988 .

[12]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  THE PRODUCTION OF CONNECTING STROKES IN CURSIVE WRITING: DEVELOPING CO-ARTICULATION IN 8 TO 12 YEAR-OLD CHILDREN , 1989 .

[13]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  THE ROLE OF SHORT-TERM MEMORY AND THE MOTOR BUFFER IN HANDWRITING UNDER VISUAL AND NON-VISUAL GUIDANCE , 1989 .

[14]  Ching Y. Suen,et al.  Computer recognition and human production of handwriting , 1989 .

[15]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The structure of graphemic representations , 1990, Cognition.

[16]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Perceptual-motor complexity of printed and cursive letters. , 1990 .

[17]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory ☆ , 1991 .

[18]  C. Perfetti The Representation Problem in Reading Acquisition , 1992 .

[19]  Louis-Jean Boë,et al.  The role of linguistics for the speed of handwriting movements : Effects of spelling uncertainty , 1993 .

[20]  P. Mounoud,et al.  Effects of lexicality and trigram frequency on handwriting production in children and adults. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[21]  William Badecker,et al.  The structure of graphemic representations in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia , 1994 .

[22]  R. Berndt,et al.  Functional pronunciation units in English words. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Pierre Mounoud,et al.  The influence of syllabic structure in handwriting and typing production , 1995 .

[24]  D. Share Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition , 1995, Cognition.

[25]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French , 1996 .

[26]  Ronald Peereman,et al.  Orthographic and Phonological Neighborhoods in Naming: Not All Neighbors Are Equally Influential in Orthographic Space , 1997 .

[27]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading , 1998 .

[28]  Format distortion and word reading: The role of multiletter units , 1999 .

[29]  D. Share Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[30]  R. Peereman,et al.  LEXOP: A lexical database providing orthography-phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[31]  Arnaud Rey,et al.  Graphemes are perceptual reading units , 2000, Cognition.

[32]  A. Lecours,et al.  The Role of Sublexical Graphemic Processing in Reading , 2000, Brain and Language.

[33]  Boris New,et al.  Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE , 2001 .

[34]  L. Siegel,et al.  Development of phonological and orthographic processing in reading aloud, in silent reading, and in spelling: a four-year longitudinal study. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[35]  P. H. Seymour,et al.  Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[36]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Phonological ambiguity and context sensitivity: On sublexical clustering in visual word recognition , 2003 .

[37]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  NORMAL AND IMPAIRED SPELLING IN A CONNECTIONIST DUAL-ROUTE ARCHITECTURE , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[38]  M. J. Tainturier,et al.  Complex Graphemes as Functional Spelling Units: Evidence from Acquired Dysgraphia , 2004 .

[39]  B. Rapp,et al.  Complex graphemes as functional spelling units: evidence from acquired dysgraphia. , 2004, Neurocase.

[40]  Richard L. Venezky,et al.  In search of the perfect orthography , 2004 .

[41]  Sylviane Valdois,et al.  The effect of orthographic regularity on children’s handwriting production , 2005 .

[42]  Arnaud Rey,et al.  Graphemic complexity and multiple print-to-sound associations in visual word recognition , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[43]  C. J. Álvarez,et al.  Syllables as processing units in handwriting production. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  S. Kandel,et al.  French and Spanish-speaking children use different visual and motor units during spelling acquisition , 2006 .