Cleavage fracture modeling of pressure vessels under transient thermo-mechanical loading

Abstract The next generation of fracture assessment procedures for nuclear reactor pressure vessels (RPVs) will combine non-linear analyses of crack front response with stochastic treatments of crack size, shape, orientation, location, material properties and thermal-pressure transients. The projected computational demands needed to support stochastic approaches with detailed 3-D, non-linear stress analyses of vessels containing defects appear well beyond current and near-term capabilities. In the interim, 2-D models become appealing to approximate certain classes of critical flaws in RPVs, and have computational demands within reach for stochastic frameworks. The present work focuses on the capability of 2-D models to provide values for the Weibull stress fracture parameter with accuracy comparable to those from very detailed 3-D models. Weibull stress approaches provide one route to connect non-linear vessel response with fracture toughness values measured using small laboratory specimens. The embedded axial flaw located in the RPV wall near the cladding-vessel interface emerges from current linear-elastic, stochastic investigations as a critical contributor to the conditional probability of initiation. Three different types of 2-D models reflecting this configuration are subjected to a thermal-pressure transient characteristic of a critical pressurized thermal shock event. The plane-strain, 2-D models include: the modified boundary layer (MBL) model, the middle tension (M(T)) model, and the 2-D RPV model. The 2-D MBL model provides a high quality estimate for the Weibull stress but only in crack front regions with a positive T-stress. For crack front locations with low constraint (T-stress

[1]  R. H. Dodds,et al.  Probabilistic Modeling of Brittle Fracture Including 3-D Effects on Constraint Loss and Ductile Tearing , 1996 .

[2]  Kim Wallin,et al.  Statistical model for carbide induced brittle fracture in steel , 1984 .

[3]  Robert H. Dodds,et al.  Constraint comparisons for common fracture specimens: C(T)s and SE(B)s , 2004 .

[4]  J. Heerens,et al.  Development of the Euro fracture toughness dataset , 2002 .

[5]  F. Mudry,et al.  A local approach to cleavage fracture , 1987 .

[6]  Robert H. Dodds,et al.  Temperature dependence of Weibull stress parameters: Studies using the Euro-material , 2006 .

[7]  Claudio Ruggieri,et al.  Correlation of fracture behavior in high pressure pipelines with axial flaws using constraint designed test specimens––Part I: Plane-strain analyses , 2005 .

[8]  Robert H. Dodds,et al.  Calibration of the Weibull stress scale parameter, σu, using the Master Curve , 2004 .

[9]  Robert H. Dodds,et al.  Constraint effects on the ductile-to-brittle transition temperature of ferritic steels: a Weibull stress model , 2000 .

[10]  D. Munz,et al.  Estimation procedure for the Weibull parameters used in the local approach , 1992, International Journal of Fracture.

[11]  Claudio Ruggieri,et al.  Correlation of fracture behavior in high pressure pipelines with axial flaws using constraint designed test specimens. Part II: 3-D effects on constraint , 2006 .

[12]  Claudio Ruggieri,et al.  Calibration of Weibull stress parameters using fracture toughness data , 1998 .

[13]  C. Shih,et al.  Relationships between the J-integral and the crack opening displacement for stationary and extending cracks , 1981 .

[14]  David M. Parks,et al.  Limits of J-T Characterization of Elastic—Plastic Crack—Tip Fields , 1995 .

[15]  M. Toyoda,et al.  Crack-tip plastic constraint activators and the application to plane-strain fracture toughness test: , 1999 .

[16]  Glaucio H. Paulino,et al.  Interaction integral procedures for 3-D curved cracks including surface tractions , 2005 .

[17]  G Bernauer,et al.  Modifications of the Beremin model for cleavage fracture in the transition region of a ferritic steel , 1999 .

[18]  A. J. Carlsson,et al.  Influence of non-singular stress terms and specimen geometry on small-scale yielding at crack tips in elastic-plastic materials , 1973 .

[19]  George J. Schuster,et al.  Developing a generalized flaw distribution for reactor pressure vessels , 2001 .

[20]  M. Williams,et al.  On the Stress Distribution at the Base of a Stationary Crack , 1956 .

[21]  Shengjun Yin,et al.  Fracture Analysis of Vessels - Oak Ridge FAVOR, v04.1, Computer Code: User's Guide , 2004 .

[22]  Andrew H. Sherry,et al.  Key features arising from structural analysis of the NESC-1 PTS benchmark experiment , 2001 .

[23]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  A statistical model of brittle fracture by transgranular cleavage , 1986 .

[24]  W. E. Pennell,et al.  Fracture assessment of shallow-flaw cruciform beams tested under uniaxial and biaxial loading conditions , 1999 .

[25]  Claudio Ruggieri,et al.  Numerical evaluation of probabilistic fracture parameters using WSTRESS , 1998 .

[26]  D. M. Knowles,et al.  A new statistical local criterion for cleavage fracture in steel. Part I: model presentation , 2004 .

[27]  A. Pineau,et al.  A local criterion for cleavage fracture of a nuclear pressure vessel steel , 1983 .

[28]  Kim Wallin,et al.  Master curve analysis of the Euro fracture toughness dataset , 2002 .

[29]  Robert H. Dodds,et al.  Coupling of the Weibull stress model and macroscale models to predict cleavage fracture , 2004 .

[30]  Kim Wallin,et al.  The scatter in KIC-results , 1984 .

[31]  A. A. Griffith The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids , 1921 .

[32]  Shengjun Yin,et al.  Fracture Analysis of Vessels. Oak Ridge FAVOR, v06.1, Computer Code: Theory and Implementation of Algorithms, Methods, and Correlations , 2007 .