Product Diversification in an Artificial Strategy Environment

The paper studies the impact of a diversification vs. a core-competence oriented strategy using an agent-based simulation model. The aim of the paper is twofold: first, we analyze whether agent-based models are a viable tool for analyzing questions related to corporate strategy. We show that standard results from the strategy literature can indeed be reproduced and refined by using this type of models. Second, the agent-based model allows us to formulate more precise hypotheses and more precisely delineate the scope of situations in which standard results from the strategy literature apply. For the problem of diversification analyzed in this paper, the results from the agent-based simulation lead to the conclusion that in addition to environmental dynamics, overall market size is also an important factor, which was not considered in the previous literature. (author's abstract)

[1]  Howard Thomas,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Competence Based Competition , 1997 .

[2]  Cynthia A. Lengnick-Hall,et al.  Similarities and contradictions in the core logic of three strategy research streams , 1999 .

[3]  W. C. Kim,et al.  Developing a global diversification measure , 1989 .

[4]  Barbara W. Keats,et al.  A Causal Model of Linkages Among Environmental Dimensions, Macro Organizational Characteristics, and Performance , 1988 .

[5]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Does corporate strategy matter , 2001 .

[6]  David L. Deephouse.  To Be Different or to Be the Same? It's a Question (and a Theory) of Strategic Balance , 1998 .

[7]  A. Vining,et al.  Metachoice for strategic analysis , 2000 .

[8]  Timothy W. Ruefli,et al.  Sustained Competitive Advantage: Temporal Dynamics and the Incidence and Persistence of Superior Economic Performance , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[9]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[10]  E. Segev.  A systematic comparative analysis and synthesis of two business-level strategic typologies , 1989 .

[11]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[12]  Kathleen M. Carley.  Computational and mathematical organization theory: Perspective and directions , 1995, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[13]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[14]  D. Hambrick.  Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types. , 1983, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[15]  Howard Thomas,et al.  DIVERSITY, DIVERSIFICATION, AND PROFITABILITY AMONG BRITISH MANUFACTURING COMPANIES, 1972-84 , 1988 .

[16]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Strategy, Management, and Strategic Planning Approaches , 1984 .

[17]  Georg Dorffner,et al.  The Effect of Incentive Schemes and Organizational Arrangements on the New Product Development Process , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[18]  K. Judd.  Computational Economics and Economic Theory: Substitutes or Complements , 1997 .

[19]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[20]  John J. Shaw,et al.  Product life cycles and product management , 1989 .

[21]  David Besanko,et al.  Economics of Strategy , 1995 .

[22]  R. Amit,et al.  Efficient corporate diversification: methods and implications , 1989 .

[23]  J. Holland,et al.  Artificial Adaptive Agents in Economic Theory , 1991 .

[24]  Paul J. H. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategy, Complexity, and Economic Rent , 1990 .

[25]  Aneel Karnani,et al.  Generic competitive strategies—An analytical approach , 1984 .

[26]  J. Barney.  Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[27]  Ernest H. Hall.  Corporate Diversification and Perfor Mance: An Investigation of Causality , 1995 .

[28]  Paul G. Simmonds,et al.  The combined diversification breadth and mode dimensions and the performance of large diversified firms , 1990 .

[29]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[30]  Birger Wernerfelt,et al.  The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence , 1991 .

[31]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[32]  Richard A. D'Aveni.  Strategic Supremacy through Disruption and Dominance , 1999 .

[33]  Jeroen Bruggeman,et al.  A Niche Width Model of Optimal Specialization , 2000, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[34]  Ahmed Belkaoui.  The Learning Curve: A Management Accounting Tool , 1986 .

[35]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[36]  Rachel Davis,et al.  Direct estimation of synergy: a new approach to the diversity-performance debate , 1993 .

[37]  P. Rajan Varadarajan,et al.  Diversification and Measures of Performance: Additional Empirical Evidence , 1987 .

[38]  G. Hendrikse.  Fundamental Issues in Strategy , 1995 .

[39]  S. Shortell,et al.  Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow's strategic types: a comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity. , 1990, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[40]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[41]  Arnoldo C. Hax,et al.  The Concept of Strategy and the Strategy Formation Process , 1988 .

[42]  Paul J. Verdin,et al.  IS PERFORMANCE DRIVEN BY INDUSTRY- OR FIRM-SPECIFIC FACTORS? A NEW LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE , 2009 .

[43]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Marketing's contribution to the implementation of business strategy: an empirical analysis , 2001 .

[44]  Stanley F. Slater,et al.  Product‐market Strategy and Performance: An Analysis of the Miles and Snow Strategy Types , 1993 .

[45]  P. Varadarajan,et al.  Delineating the scope of corporate, business, and marketing strategy , 1994 .

[46]  P. Rajan Varadarajan,et al.  Product Diversity and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 1986 .

[47]  Douglas D. Moesel,et al.  CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF AN OBJECTIVE (ENTROPY) CATEGORICAL MEASURE OF DIVERSIFICATION STRATEGY , 1993 .

[48]  R. Bettis.  Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms , 1981 .

[49]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Curvilinearity in the diversification–performance linkage: an examination of over three decades of research , 2000 .

[51]  Leigh Tesfatsion,et al.  Agent-Based Computational Economics: A Brief Guide to the Literature , 2000 .

[52]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Extending the Cyert-March Duopoly Model: Organizational and Economic Insights , 2000 .

[53]  Anil M. Pandya,et al.  Number 2 Fall 1998 67 DIVERSIFICATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE : AN EMPIRICAL EVALUATION , 1998 .

[54]  Bernard Burnes,et al.  Organizational choice and organizational change , 1997 .

[55]  Constantinos C. Markides,et al.  Corporate Diversification And Organizational Structure: A Resource-Based View , 1996 .

[56]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Research Evidence On The Miles-Snow Typology , 1990 .

[57]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[58]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Broader product line: a necessity to achieve success? , 1990 .

[59]  Alan Fowler,et al.  Systems modelling, simulation, and the dynamics of strategy , 2003 .

[60]  H. Greve.  Managerial Cognition and the Mimetic Adoption of Market Positions: What You See is What You Do , 1998 .

[61]  R. Gulati,et al.  The economic modeling of strategy process: ‘clean models’ and ‘dirty hands’ , 2000 .

[62]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .