Management alternatives of energy wood thinning stands

Abstract Energy wood thinning has become a feasible treatment alternative of young stands in Finland. Energy wood thinnings have been carried out mainly in stands where precommercial thinning has been neglected and the harvesting conditions for industrial wood thinning are difficult. Despite of its positive effects on harvesting costs and on renewable energy potential, whole-tree harvesting has been constantly criticized for causing growth loss. In this paper, the profitability of energy wood thinning was studied in 20 Scots pine-dominated stands where energy wood thinning was carried out. The growth of the stands after thinning was predicted with the help of Motti-stand simulator. Entire rotation time of the stands was simulated with different management alternatives. The intensity of first thinning and recovery level of logging residues varied between alternatives. In order to attain acceptable harvesting conditions, industrial wood thinning had to be delayed. The effect of energy wood thinning on subsequent stem wood growth was almost the same as in conventional thinning. Whole-tree harvesting for energy proved to be profitable alternative if the stumpage price is around 3€ m −3 , the interest rate is 3% or 5% and the removal of pulpwood is less than 20 m 3  ha −1 . If the harvestable pulpwood yield is over 20 m 3  ha −1 , integrated harvesting of industrial and energy wood or delayed industrial wood harvesting becomes more profitable.

[1]  K. Korhonen,et al.  Pirkanmaan metsäkeskuksen alueen metsävarat 1965–1999 , 1970 .

[2]  K. Korhonen,et al.  Etelä-Pohjanmaan metsäkeskuksen alueen metsävarat ja niiden kehitys 1968–97 , 1970 .

[3]  M. Kukkola,et al.  Impact of whole-tree harvesting and compensatory fertilization on growth of coniferous thinning stands , 2000 .

[4]  E. Valinger,et al.  Wind and snow damage in a thinning and fertilisation experiment in Pinus sylvestris , 1994 .

[5]  L. Marklund,et al.  Biomass functions for pine, spruce and birch in Sweden , 1988 .

[6]  A. Isomäki,et al.  Consequences of injury caused by timber harvesting machines on the growth and decay of spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). , 1974 .

[7]  A. Ahtikoski,et al.  Ensiharvennuksen ajoituksen ja voimakkuuden vaikutus kuivahkon kankaan männiköiden tuotokseen ja tuottoon , 1970 .

[8]  Mika Lehtonen,et al.  Reusing legacy FORTRAN in the MOTTI growth and yield simulator , 2005 .

[9]  M. Sirén,et al.  Karsitun energiapuun korjuuvaihtoehdot ja kustannustekijät , 2005 .

[10]  Antti Ihalainen,et al.  Keski-Suomen metsäkeskuksen alueen metsävarat ja niiden kehitys 1967–96 , 1970 .

[11]  Helena M. Henttonen,et al.  Etelä-Savon metsäkeskuksen alueen metsävarat 1966–2000 , 1970 .

[12]  Risto Sievänen,et al.  Comparison of a physiological model and a statistical model for prediction of growth and yield in boreal forests , 2003 .

[13]  K. Korhonen,et al.  Hämeen-Uudenmaan metsäkeskuksen alueen metsävarat 1965–99 , 1970 .

[14]  Pohjois-Savon metsäkeskuksen alueen metsävarat ja niiden kehitys 1967–96 , 1970 .