Integration of lidar with the NIITEK GPR for improved performance on rough terrain

Vehicle-mounted ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has proved to be a valuable technology for buried threat detection, especially in the area of military route clearance. However, detection performance may be degraded in very rough terrain or o-road conditions. This is because the signal processing approaches for target detection in GPR rst identify the ground re ection in the data, and then align the data in order to remove the ground re ection. Under extremely rough terrain, antenna bounce and multipath eects render nding the ground re ection a dicult task, and errors in ground localization can lead to data alignment that distorts potential target signatures and/or creates false alarms. In this work, commercial-o-the-shelf light detection and ranging (LIDAR), global positioning system (GPS), and inertial measurement unit (IMU) were integrated with a GPR into a prototype route clearance system. The LIDAR provided high-resolution measurements of the ground surface prole, and the GPS/IMU recorded the vehicle's position and orientation. Experiments investigated the applicability of the integrated system for nding the ground re ection in GPR data and decoupling vehicle motion from the rough surface response. Assessment of ground-tracking performance was based on an experiment involving three prepared test lanes, each with dierent congurations of buried targets and terrain obstacles. Several algorithms for target detection in GPR were applied to the data, both with traditional preprocessing and incorporating the LIDAR and IMU. Experimental results suggest that the LIDAR and IMU may be valuable components for ground tracking in next-generation GPR systems.

[1]  James Byrnes,et al.  Unexploded Ordnance Detection and Mitigation , 2008 .

[2]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Detection and Discrimination of Land Mines in Ground-Penetrating Radar Based on Edge Histogram Descriptors and a Possibilistic K-Nearest , 2009 .

[3]  Carey M. Rappaport,et al.  Quantifying the effects of different rough surface statistics for mine detection using the FDTD technique , 2000, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[4]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Frequency Subband Processing and Feature Analysis of Forward-Looking Ground-Penetrating Radar Signals for Land-Mine Detection , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  G. Martin Milner Random GPR antennae height variations and mine detection performance , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Detection and Discrimination of Land Mines in Ground-Penetrating Radar Based on Edge Histogram Descriptors and a Possibilistic $K$-Nearest Neighbor Classifier , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[7]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Feature and decision level sensor fusion of electromagnetic induction and ground penetrating radar sensors for landmine detection with hand-held units , 2002, Inf. Fusion.

[8]  David J. Daniels,et al.  Ground Penetrating Radar for Buried Landmine and IED Detection , 2009 .

[9]  George Casella,et al.  Comparison of algorithms for finding the air-ground interface in ground penetrating radar signals , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Decision Fusion of Ground-Penetrating Radar and Metal Detector Algorithms—A Robust Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Landmine detection with ground penetrating radar using hidden Markov models , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  P.A. Torrione,et al.  Performance of an adaptive feature-based processor for a wideband ground penetrating radar system , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.