The mechanical properties of red deer antler bone when used in fighting

SUMMARY We assessed the hydration state of antlers and its effect on antler mechanical properties compared with wet femur. Red deer antlers were removed from the head at various times, from a few days after velvet shedding till late in the season, and weighed weekly until after casting time. Antlers cut just after losing their velvet lost weight rapidly in the first few weeks, then settled down and changed weight very little, the latter changes correlating with air relative humidity. Antlers cut later showed little weight change at any time. The water content of cortical and trabecular parts of the contralateral antler was assessed after cutting. Most of the weight loss was from the cancellous, not the cortical, part of the antler. Wet and dry specimens from the antlers, and wet specimens from deer femora, were tested mechanically. Compared with wet bone, wet antler had a much lower modulus of elasticity and bending strength, but a higher work to fracture. Compared with wet bone, dry antler showed a somewhat lower Young's modulus, but a considerably higher bending strength and a much higher work to fracture. The impact energy absorption of dry antler was much greater than that of wet bone. In red deer, the antler is effectively dry during its use in fights, at least in southern Spain. In addition, dry antler, compared with ordinary bone, shows mechanical properties that suit it admirably for its fighting function.

[1]  R. Goss,et al.  Future directions in antler research , 1995, The Anatomical record.

[2]  G. Whitehead Whitehead encyclopedia of deer , 1993 .

[3]  T. Szuwart,et al.  Deer antler regeneration: Cells, concepts, and controversies , 2007, Journal of morphology.

[4]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Regional differences in some of the physical properties of the human femur. , 1951, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  L. Gallego,et al.  Biometrics, testosterone, cortisol and antler growth cycle in Iberian red deer stags (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). , 2010, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[6]  R. Blob,et al.  Antler stiffness in moose (Alces alces): Correlated evolution of bone function and material properties? , 2006, Journal of morphology.

[7]  J. Wysolmerski The Evolutionary Origins of Maternal Calcium and Bone Metabolism During Lactation , 2002, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[8]  S. Allen,et al.  Exploring the mechanisms regulating regeneration of deer antlers. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  N. Ramanathan,et al.  Tensile properties of antler bone , 1982, Calcified Tissue International.

[10]  J. McKittrick,et al.  Comparison of the structure and mechanical properties of bovine femur bone and antler of the North American elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis). , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[11]  L. Gallego,et al.  Population management and bone structural effects in composition and radio-opacity of Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) antlers , 2008, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[12]  T. Landete-Castillejos,et al.  Does chemical composition of antler bone reflect the physiological effort made to grow it? , 2007, Bone.

[13]  D. A. MacDonald,et al.  On steady flow through modelled vascular stenoses. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  G. Lincoln Biology of antlers , 1992 .

[15]  T. Clutton‐Brock The Functions of Antlers , 1982 .

[16]  Peter Zioupos,et al.  The extent of microcracking and the morphology of microcracks in damaged bone , 1994, Journal of Materials Science.

[17]  T. Landete-Castillejos,et al.  Effect of advancing births on testosterone until 2.5 years of age and puberty in Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). , 2006, Animal reproduction science.

[18]  Richard J. Goss,et al.  Deer Antlers: Regeneration, Function and Evolution , 1983 .

[19]  J. F. V. Vincent,et al.  Young’s moduli and shear moduli in cortical bone , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  J. Currey,et al.  Influence of physiological effort of growth and chemical composition on antler bone mechanical properties. , 2007, Bone.

[21]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  The logical stag: Adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  John Currey,et al.  Incompatible mechanical properties in compact bone. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  Andres J. Garcia,et al.  The Young's Modulus and Impact Energy Absorption of Wet and Dry Deer Cortical Bone , 2009 .

[24]  F. Melsen,et al.  The rhythmic relation between antler and bone porosity in Danish deer. , 1987, Bone.

[25]  J. Currey,et al.  Changes in the impact energy absorption of bone with age. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  H. Rolf,et al.  Hard fallow deer antler: A living bone till antler casting? , 1999, The Anatomical record.

[27]  Chunyi Li,et al.  Histological examination of antler regeneration in red deer (Cervus elaphus). , 2005, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[28]  Heather E Johnson,et al.  Effects of antler breakage on mating behavior in male tule elk (Cervus elaphus nannodes) , 2007, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[29]  G. Barrell,et al.  Calcium metabolism in red deer (Cervus elaphus) offered herbages during antlerogenesis: kinetic and stable balance studies , 1987, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[30]  Jacques P. Brown,et al.  Bone strength: the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. , 2006, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[31]  J. Currey,et al.  Mechanical properties of bone tissues with greatly differing functions. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.