Conversational Styles in Language Proficiency Interviews

This study compares the conversational styles of intermediate and advanced learners of ESL in language proficiency interviews. Eleven intermediate learners and 12 advanced learners participated in a regular administration of the Cambridge First Certificate in English oral interview. I analyzed interview discourse constructed by both interviewer and nonnative speakers (NNSs), using a quantitative model of topical organization. I found differences in the amount of talk and rate of speaking (advanced learners talked more and faster than intermediate learners), in the extent of context dependence (advanced learners elaborated more in answers to questions), and in the ability to construct and sustain narratives (advanced learners did so, intermediate learners did not). There were no differences between the two groups in the frequency of initiation of new topics, nor in the reactivity to topics introduced by the interviewers. Interviewers did not vary in their interviewing style with the two groups. Some of these findings contradict what designers of language proficiency interviews claim to be proficiency-related differences between NNSs. The discrepancies may be due to the format of the interview and/or to differing expectations of the interview by interviewers and NNSs from different cultures.

[1]  Roger Griffiths,et al.  Pausological Research in an L2 Context: A Rationale, and Review of Selected Studies , 1991 .

[2]  Leo Van Lier,et al.  Reeling, Writhing, Drawling, Stretching, and Fainting in Coils: Oral Proficiency Interviews as Conversation , 1989 .

[3]  P. Lennon Investigating Fluency in EFL: A Quantitative Approach* , 1990 .

[4]  Annette Karmiloff-Smith,et al.  Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective , 1985 .

[5]  Thorn Huebner,et al.  SYSTEM AND VARIABILITY IN INTERLANGUAGE SYNTAX , 1985 .

[6]  Richard Young,et al.  The Impact of Interaction on Comprehension , 1987 .

[7]  John L. D. Clark,et al.  “Screen-to-screen” testing: An exploratory study of oral proficiency interviewing using video teleconferencing , 1992 .

[8]  E. Shohamy A Proposed Framework for Testing the Oral Language of Second/Foreign Language Learners , 1988, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[9]  Jane Zuengler,et al.  Relative Knowledge of Content Domain: An Influence on Native-Non-native Conversations , 1991 .

[10]  Steven J. Ross,et al.  The Discourse of Accommodation in Oral Proficiency Interviews , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[11]  Daniel J. Reed The Relationship between Criterion-Based Levels of Oral Proficiency and Norm-Referenced Scores of General Proficiency in English as a Second Language. , 1992 .

[12]  Cynthia A. Brock The Effects of Referential Questions on ESL Classroom Discourse , 1986 .

[13]  D. Maynard Placement of topic changes in conversation , 1980 .

[14]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Analyzing Topical Structure in ESL Essays , 1990, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[15]  Anne Lazaraton,et al.  The Structural Organization of a Language Interview: A Conversation Analytic Perspective. , 1992 .

[16]  Jane Zuengler,et al.  Encouraging Learners' Conversational Participation: The Effect of Content Knowledge , 1993 .

[17]  Karl Reisman,et al.  Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking: Contrapuntal Conversations in an Antiguan Village , 1989 .

[18]  James P. Lantolf,et al.  Proficiency: Understanding the Construct. , 1988 .

[19]  Topic and variation in ITA oral proficiency: SPEAK and field-specific tests , 1989 .

[20]  Michael Milanovic,et al.  Discourse Variation in Oral Proficiency Interviews , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[21]  Dan Douglas,et al.  Principles for language tests within the 'discourse domains' theory of interlanguage: research, test construction and interpretation , 1985 .