Assessing the performance of hybrid CSP + PV plants in northern Chile

Abstract Electricity systems in Chile are characterized by a variable hourly demand in the central grid and an almost constant demand in the northern grid, which require different operation strategies for solar power plants depending on their location. Hybridizing a CSP plant with a PV system can increase the overall plant capacity factor by allowing thermal energy to be stored while the PV plant is in production and thus help to achieve a fully dispatchable solar electricity production system. A power generation and economic analysis of two hybrid CSP + PV plant models were developed considering a range of plant capacities based on parabolic trough or central receiver plants, combined with a PV system. Environmental conditions were considered for a site in the Atacama Desert, which is a hotspot of solar energy development in the country and shares the solar radiation characteristics of northern Chile. The study conducts a parametric analysis and optimization of the storage and power block sizes for the CSP plants in terms of the levelized cost of energy (LCOE), when the nominal capacity of the PV plant is varied. The annual production of the plants is calculated using the Transient System Simulation program (TRNSYS), which uses a new component library developed for that purpose. From the results of the simulations, the high potential for hybrid CSP + PV plants in the Atacama Desert is clear, because the high levels of irradiation available in northern Chile provide a competitive electricity cost, allowing investors to access PPA contracts at competitive prices and achieving competitive costs with respect to other energy sources.

[1]  Sigifredo Gonzalez,et al.  Performance Model for Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Inverters , 2007 .

[2]  Werner J. Platzer,et al.  Combined solar thermal and photovoltaic power plants - An approach to 24h solar electricity? , 2016 .

[3]  B L Kistler,et al.  A user's manual for DELSOL3: A computer code for calculating the optical performance and optimal system design for solar thermal central receiver plants , 1986 .

[4]  Gregory J. Kolb,et al.  Power Tower Technology Roadmap and Cost Reduction Plan , 2011 .

[5]  M. Wagner.  Simulation and predictive performance modeling of utility-scale central receiver system power plants , 2008 .

[6]  William E. Boyson,et al.  Photovoltaic array performance model. , 2004 .

[7]  Garvin A. Heath,et al.  Molten Salt Power Tower Cost Model for the System Advisor Model (SAM) , 2013 .

[8]  Michael J. Wagner,et al.  Technical Manual for the SAM Physical Trough Model , 2011 .

[9]  Gregory J. Kolb,et al.  Current and Future Costs for Parabolic Trough and Power Tower Systems in the US Market: Preprint , 2010 .

[10]  R. Garreaud.  Intraseasonal Variability of Moisture and Rainfall over the South American Altiplano , 2000 .

[11]  John Boland,et al.  Estimating the potential for solar energy utilization in Chile by satellite-derived data and ground station measurements , 2015 .

[12]  S. Jones,et al.  A TRNSYS Model Library for Solar Thermal Electric Components (STEC) - A Reference Manual, Release 1.0 , 1998 .

[13]  G. Morin,et al.  Comparison of Linear Fresnel and Parabolic Trough Collector power plants , 2012 .

[14]  Antonio L. Avila-Marin,et al.  Evaluation of the potential of central receiver solar power plants: Configuration, optimization and trends , 2013 .

[15]  Ty Neises,et al.  Simulation of Direct Steam Power Tower Concentrated Solar Plant , 2012 .

[16]  Rodrigo Escobar,et al.  Solar energy resource assessment in Chile: Satellite estimation and ground station measurements , 2014 .

[17]  Michael Wetter,et al.  Generic Optimization Program User Manual Version 3.0.0 , 2009 .

[18]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  Development Steps for Parabolic Trough Solar Power Technologies With Maximum Impact on Cost Reduction , 2007 .

[19]  Nate Blair,et al.  Solar Advisor Model User Guide for Version 2.0 , 2008 .

[20]  Donald Chung,et al.  U.S. Photovoltaic Prices and Cost Breakdowns. Q1 2015 Benchmarks for Residential, Commercial, and Utility-Scale Systems , 2015 .

[21]  A. Green,et al.  High Capacity Factor CSP-PV Hybrid Systems☆ , 2015 .

[22]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Pure and Pseudo-pure Fluid Thermophysical Property Evaluation and the Open-Source Thermophysical Property Library CoolProp , 2014, Industrial & engineering chemistry research.

[23]  Craig Turchi,et al.  Parabolic Trough Reference Plant for Cost Modeling with the Solar Advisor Model (SAM) , 2010 .