Pathways to Legitimacy Among Consumer Loan Providers in New York City, 1914-1934

In this paper, I study the early development of two organizational forms: credit unions and Morris Plan banks which, in the early twentieth century became socially acceptable money-lenders. Three forms of legitimacycognitive, moral, and pragmaticare important in understanding their evolution and social integration. Cognitive legitimacy corresponds to what is usually considered by organizational ecologists to be legitimacy as 'taken-for-grantedness'. Organizations have moral legitimacy in so far as they have the moral approval of most members of society. Pragmatic legitimacy 'rests on the self-interested calculations of an organization's most immediate audiences' (Suchman 1995). The analysis goes beyond previous work in two ways. First, new mechanisms of legitimation are introduced into models of organizational founding and growth. Second, organizations are assumed to be able to deliberately influence their legitimacy by their actions. Empirical tests combine quantitative analyses of founding and growth rates with a qualitative analysis of historical material. In addition to density-dependent processes of legitimation, the organizations are found to act in a social-movement-like manner, thereby enhancing their moral legitimacy. This increases their founding and growth rates, and gives them a competitive advantage over earlier forms of money-lending that lacked moral legitimacy. I also find evidence that pragmatic legitimacy is spread via social networks.

[1]  M. Weber General Economic History , 1924 .

[2]  M. Hannan,et al.  A Time to Grow and a Time to Die: Growth and Mortality of Credit Unions in New York City, 1914-1990 , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Organizational evolution in a multinational context: entries of automobile manufacturers in Belgium, Britain, France, Germany, and Italy , 1995 .

[4]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  On Using Institutional Theory in Studying Organizational Populations , 1989 .

[5]  Jack Kloppenburg,et al.  Aiming for the discursive high ground: Monsanto and the biotechnology controversy , 1991 .

[6]  M. McPherson An Ecology of Affiliation , 1983 .

[7]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Theory building and cheap talk about legitimation: reply to Baum and Powell , 1995 .

[8]  Mark C. Suchman Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[9]  Lynne G. Zucker,et al.  Combining Institutional Theory and Population Ecology: No Legitimacy, No History , 1989 .

[10]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  E. Romanelli,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1992 .

[12]  Robert C. Solomon,et al.  Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business , 1992 .

[13]  Paul DiMaggio Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[14]  G. Simmel The Philosophy of Money , 1979 .

[15]  H. E. Krooss The Credit Union Movement: Origins and Development, 1850–1970 . By J. Carroll Moody and Gilbert C. Fite. Lincoln, Neb., University of Nebraska Press, 1971. Pp. ix + 369. $9.50. , 1972, Business History Review.

[16]  M. Hannan,et al.  Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. , 1986 .

[17]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Cultivating an institutional ecology of organizations: comment on Hannan, Carroll, Dundon, and Torres , 1995 .

[18]  P. Laird Buy Now, Pay Later: Advertising, Credit, and Consumer Durables in the 1920s by Martha L. Olney (review) , 1992, Technology and Culture.

[19]  Trond Petersen,et al.  Estimating Fully Parametric Hazard Rate Models with Time-Dependent Covariates , 1986 .

[20]  G. Carroll,et al.  Density Dependence in the Evolution of Populations of Newspaper Organizations , 1989 .