Mutual information function assesses autonomic information flow of heart rate dynamics at different time scales

The autonomic information flow (AIF) represents the complex communication within the Autonomic Nervous System (ANS). It can be assessed by the mutual information function (MIF) of heart rate fluctuations (HRF). The complexity of HRF is based on several interacting physiological mechanisms operating at different time scales. Therefore one prominent time scale for HRF complexity analysis is not given a priori. The MIF reflects the information flow at different time scales. This approach is defined and evaluated in the present paper. In order to aggregate relevant physiological time scales, the MIF of HRF obtained from eight adult Lewis rats during the awake state, under general anesthesia, with additional vagotomy, and additional beta1-adrenergic blockade are investigated. Physiologically relevant measures of the MIF were assessed with regard to the discrimination of these states. A simulation study of a periodically excited pendulum is performed to clarify the influence of the time scale of MIF in comparison to the Kolmogorov Sinai entropy (KSE) of that well defined system. The general relevance of the presented AIF approach was confirmed by comparing mutual information, approximate entropy, and sample entropy at their respective time scales.

[1]  P E Rapp,et al.  A guide to dynamical analysis , 1994, Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society.

[2]  D. Ruelle,et al.  Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors , 1985 .

[3]  Denis Mestivier,et al.  Quantification of sympathetic and parasympathetic tones by nonlinear indexes in normotensive rats. , 1998, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[4]  A. Malliani,et al.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use , 1996 .

[5]  Bernd Pompe,et al.  Ranking and Entropy Estimation in Nonlinear Time Series Analysis , 1998 .

[6]  Madalena Costa,et al.  Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[7]  S M Pincus,et al.  Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  F. Takens.  Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[9]  M Eiselt,et al.  Using mutual information to measure coupling in the cardiorespiratory system. , 1998, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[10]  Giuseppe Baselli,et al.  Prediction of short cardiovascular variability signals based on conditional distribution , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Giuseppe Baselli,et al.  Measuring regularity by means of a corrected conditional entropy in sympathetic outflow , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  Henry D. I. Abarbanel,et al.  Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data , 1995 .

[13]  U. Zwiener,et al.  Practical problems of determining the dimensions of heart rate data , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[14]  A. Malliani,et al.  Information domain analysis of cardiovascular variability signals: Evaluation of regularity, synchronisation and co-ordination , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[15]  T G Buchman,et al.  Experimental human endotoxemia increases cardiac regularity: results from a prospective, randomized, crossover trial. , 1996, Critical care medicine.

[16]  J. Clairambault,et al.  Linear and non-linear analyses of heart rate variability: a minireview. , 1996, Cardiovascular research.

[17]  Bernd Pompe,et al.  Experiments on periodic and chaotic motions of a parametrically forced pendulum , 1985 .

[18]  T G Buchman,et al.  Uncoupling of biological oscillators: a complementary hypothesis concerning the pathogenesis of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. , 1996, Critical care medicine.

[19]  James Theiler,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data , 1992 .

[20]  G E Morfill,et al.  Complexity Diagnostics in Cardiology: Fundamental Considerations , 1994, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[21]  A Schirdewan,et al.  Multiparametric Analysis of Heart Rate Variability Used for Risk Stratification Among Survivors of Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1998, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[22]  G. Schmidt,et al.  Complexity Diagnostics in Cardiology: Methods , 1994, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[23]  M. P. Griffin,et al.  Sample entropy analysis of neonatal heart rate variability. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[24]  G G Haddad,et al.  Heart rate control in normal and aborted-SIDS infants. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[25]  Julián J. González,et al.  Detection and sources of nonlinearity in the variability of cardiac R-R intervals and blood pressure in rats. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[26]  Jørgen K. Kanters,et al.  Short- and long-term variations in non-linear dynamics of heart rate variability. , 1996, Cardiovascular research.

[27]  U Zwiener,et al.  Characterization of complex heart rate dynamics and their pharmacological disorders by non-linear prediction and special data transformations. , 1996, Cardiovascular research.

[28]  Dirk Hoyer,et al.  Mutual information and phase dependencies: measures of reduced nonlinear cardiorespiratory interactions after myocardial infarction. , 2002, Medical engineering & physics.

[29]  J. Richman,et al.  Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.