Information technology, medical education, and anatomy for the twenty‐first century

Medicine is experiencing an escalating explosion of information. With more data available about more topics, the key questions are how to access and make sense of the medical information jungle. Skill in choosing and applying information is essential for both medical education and practice and will require new approaches to mastering data. Medical education, like medicine itself, will continue to be driven by technology, and we can expect our students to be increasingly computer literate. Thus the role of medical education will become more one of how to use this information than of obtaining the information itself. What medical education must focus on is the processing of information for appropriate medical care. This, in turn, depends upon practitioners having contexts in which the relevance and significance of information can be evaluated. New imaging technologies and molecular advances demand a broader understanding of both health and disease. With the information explosion “on line,” how can a student use this to understand the structure and function of the human body in four dimensions? Anatomy, the structural basis for life, provides a unique and necessary perspective on the human body from the molecular to the macroscopic. A solid foundation in anatomy is the best preparation for an effective physical examination and for safe, efficient basic clinical procedures. Finally, anatomy laboratories provide a context for learning other important aspects of medicine—group process, clinical problem solving, and a sensitivity to human mortality. Advocating for these unique features of our discipline in medical education is the task facing anatomists as we end this millennium. The challenges and opportunities for us have never been greater, if we don't throw out the baby with the bath water. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  R. Newell Follow the royal road: the case for dissection. , 1995, Clinical anatomy.

[2]  S. Krackov,et al.  The use of small group case‐based exercises in human gross anatomy: A method for introducing active learning in a traditional course format , 1994 .

[3]  S. Bertman,et al.  Experiences with learning about death and dying in the undergraduate anatomy curriculum. , 1980, Journal of medical education.

[4]  A M Epstein,et al.  The outcomes movement--will it get us where we want to go? , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  J. H. Bennett,et al.  Becoming a medical information master: feeling good about not knowing everything. , 1994, The Journal of family practice.

[6]  J. Shaw-dunn Follow the radical road: Comment on R. L. M. newell's paper , 1995, Clinical anatomy.

[7]  J. Penney Reactions of medical students to dissection. , 1985, Journal of medical education.

[8]  D. Lindberg,et al.  Unified Medical Language System , 2020, Definitions.

[9]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Guidelines for reading literature reviews. , 1988, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[10]  Kenneth A. Arndt,et al.  Information excess in medicine : overview, relevance to dermatology, and strategies for coping , 1992 .

[11]  E. J. Evans,et al.  The dissecting room: Reactions of first year medical students , 1992 .

[12]  C. Mulrow The medical review article: state of the science. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[13]  R. Haynes Clinical review articles. , 1992, BMJ.

[14]  B. D. Lewin Counter‐Transference in the Technique of Medical Practice , 1946, Psychosomatic medicine.

[15]  S. Dovey,et al.  Effects of cadaver dissection on the attitudes of medical students , 1994, Medical education.

[16]  D. Cahill,et al.  A special anatomic preparation for teaching central venous catheterization , 1996, Clinical anatomy.

[17]  J. Lubitz,et al.  Trends in Medicare payments in the last year of life. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  P. Silverman,et al.  Renal fascial pathway: posterior extension of pancreatic effusions within the anterior pararenal space. , 1986, Radiology.

[19]  S. Dovey,et al.  Attitudes to Death and Dying in the UK, New Zealand, and Japan , 1995, Journal of palliative care.

[20]  S. Bertman,et al.  The dissection experience as a laboratory for self‐discovery about death and dying: Another side of clinical anatomy , 1989 .

[21]  J. H. Bennett,et al.  Becoming an information master: a guidebook to the medical information jungle. , 1994, The Journal of family practice.

[22]  Lawrence H. Mathers,et al.  Post‐traumatic stress among medical students in the anatomy dissection laboratory , 1990 .

[23]  Richard Saul Wurman,et al.  Information Anxiety 2 , 1989 .

[24]  Eli M. Noam Electronics and the Dim Future of the University , 1995, Science.

[25]  C. Hulsebosch,et al.  Status of gross anatomy in the U.S. and Canada: Dilemma for the 21st century , 1994 .

[26]  N. Gustavson The effect of human dissection on first-year students and implications for the doctor-patient relationship. , 1988, Journal of medical education.

[27]  M Utting,et al.  What future for dissection in courses of human topographical anatomy in universities in the UK? , 1995, Clinical anatomy.

[28]  S. Nuland How We Die , 1997 .

[29]  V. Raptopoulos,et al.  Fascial planes and compartments of the posterior abdomen: The perirenal and pararenal pathways , 1990 .

[30]  J. Woolliscroft Who will teach? A fundamental challenge to medical education , 1995, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[31]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1993, JAMA.

[32]  S. Bertman,et al.  Humanities in medical education: rationale and resources for the dissection laboratory , 1985, Medical education.

[33]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: I. How to Get Started , 1993 .

[34]  S. Hawks,et al.  Review of Spiritual Health: Definition, Role, and Intervention Strategies in Health Promotion , 1995, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[35]  J R Skidmore,et al.  The case for prosection: Comment on R. L. M. newell's paper , 1995, Clinical anatomy.