Dragonfly flight. II. Velocities, accelerations and kinematics of flapping flight.

The free flapping flight of the dragonfly Sympetrum sanguineum and the damselfly Calopteryx splendens was filmed in a large flight enclosure at 3000 frames s-1. The wingtip kinematics are described for these flights. Despite the two species being similar in size, the damselfly flew with wingbeat frequencies half those of the dragonfly. The damselfly could perform a clap and fling, and the proximity to which the wings approached each other during this manoeuvre correlated with the total force produced during the wingstroke. The dragonfly beat its wings with a set inclination of the stroke planes with respect to the londitudinal body axis; the damselfly, in contrast, showed a greater variation in this angle. Both species aligned their stroke planes to be nearly normal to the direction of the resultant force, the thrust. In order to achieve this, the dragonfly body alignment correlated with the direction of thrust. However, the damselfly body alignment was independent of the thrust direction. Velocities and accelerations were greater for the dragonfly than for the damselfly. However, non-dimensional velocities and accelerations normalised by the wingbeat periods were greater for the damselfly.

[1]  F. Hollick.  The flight of the dipterous fly Muscina stabulans Fallén , 1940, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[2]  Olavi Sotavalta,et al.  The flight-tone (wing-stroke frequency) of insects (Contributions to the problem of insect flight 1.) , 1947 .

[3]  S. Vogel.  Flight in Drosophila : I. Flight Performance of Tethered Flies , 1966 .

[4]  S. Vogel.  Flight in Drosophila. II. Variations in stroke parameters and wing contour. , 1967, The Journal of experimental biology.

[5]  T. Weis-Fogh,et al.  Respiration and tracheal ventilation in locusts and otger flying insects. , 1967, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  M. Gewecke.  Antennae: Another Wind-sensitive Receptor in Locusts , 1970, Nature.

[7]  T. Weis-Fogh.  Energetics of Hovering Flight in Hummingbirds and in Drosophila , 1972 .

[8]  M. Lighthill.  On the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation , 1973, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  T. Weis-Fogh.  Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals , 1973 .

[10]  H. Heinzel,et al.  Role of antennae of the dragonfly Orthetrum cancellatum in flight control , 1974, Nature.

[11]  R. Norberg.  Hovering Flight of the Dragonfly Aeschna Juncea L., Kinematics and Aerodynamics , 1975 .

[12]  P. S. Baker,et al.  Weis-Fogh clap and fling mechanism in Locusta , 1977, Nature.

[13]  L. Bennett.  Clap and Fling Aerodynamics-An Experimental Evaluation , 1977 .

[14]  T. Maxworthy.  Experiments on the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation by insects in hovering flight. Part 1. Dynamics of the ‘fling’ , 1979, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  H. J. Haussling.  Boundary-fitted coordinates for accurate numerical solution of multibody flow problems , 1979 .

[16]  C. David,et al.  Optomotor control of speed and height by free-flying Drosophila. , 1979, The Journal of experimental biology.

[17]  C. E. Lan,et al.  The unsteady quasi-vortex-lattice method with applications to animal propulsion , 1979, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  R. Edwards,et al.  The separation vortex in the Weis-Fogh circulation-generation mechanism , 1982, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  J. Wu,et al.  Unsteady aerodynamics of articulate lifting bodies , 1984 .

[20]  D. E. Alexander.  Unusual Phase Relationships Between The Forewings And Hindwings In Flying Dragonflies , 1984 .

[21]  C. Somps,et al.  Dragonfly Flight: Novel Uses of Unsteady Separated Flows , 1985, Science.

[22]  I. Watanabe,et al.  Flight Mechanics of a Dragonfly , 1985 .

[23]  H. Pfau.  Untersuchungen zur Konstruktionc Funktion und Evolution des Flugapparates der Libellen lInsectac Odonatar , 1986 .

[24]  G. Spedding,et al.  The generation of circulation and lift in a rigid two-dimensional fling , 1986, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  D. E. Alexander.  Wind tunnel studies of turns by flying dragonflies. , 1986, The Journal of experimental biology.

[26]  J. Marden.  Maximum Lift Production During Takeoff in Flying Animals , 1987 .

[27]  Marvin Luttges,et al.  Visualization of unsteady separated flow produced by mechanically driven dragonfly wing kinematics model , 1988 .

[28]  A. Azuma,et al.  Flight Performance of a Dragonfly , 1988 .

[29]  A. R. Ennos.  THE IMPORTANCE OF TORSION IN THE DESIGN OF INSECT WINGS , 1988 .

[30]  G. Rüppell.  Kinematic Analysis of Symmetrical Flight Manoeuvres of Odonata , 1989 .

[31]  Marvin W. Luttges,et al.  Accomplished Insect Fliers , 1989 .

[32]  A. R. Ennos.  The kinematics and aerodynamics of the free flight of some diptera , 1989 .

[33]  K. Götz,et al.  The Wing Beat of Drosophila Melanogaster. II. Dynamics , 1990 .

[34]  R. Dudley,et al.  Mechanics of Forward Flight in Bumblebees: I. Kinematics and Morphology , 1990 .

[35]  R. Wootton.  The functional morphology of the wings of Odonata , 1991 .

[36]  M. May.  Dragonfly Flight: Power Requirements at High Speed and Acceleration , 1991 .

[37]  Akira Azuma,et al.  The Biokinetics of Flying and Swimming , 1992 .

[38]  S. Sunada,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL ‘NEAR FLING’ , 1993 .

[39]  The flight of the relict dragonfly Epiophlebia superstes in comparison with that of the modern Odonata , 1993 .

[40]  Dickinson,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF WING ROTATION ON UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBERS , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[41]  J. Wakeling,et al.  Dragonfly flight. I. Gliding flight and steady-state aerodynamic forces. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[42]  J. Wakeling,et al.  Dragonfly flight. III. Lift and power requirements. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.