A comparative study of image features for classification of breast microcalcifications

Computer-aided diagnosis systems for mammography have been developed in order to assist radiologists in the diagnostic process by providing a reliable and objective discrimination of benign and malignant mammographic findings. The effectiveness of such systems is based on the image features extracted from mammograms, which are mainly related to the morphology, texture and optical density of the suspicious abnormality. There are many methodologies reported in the literature able to provide a mathematical description of a mammographic lesion. In this paper, we apply various feature extraction methodologies on cases containing clusters of microcalcifications. Our purpose is to compare their performance in large scale in terms of classification accuracy and to investigate their potentiality in discriminating benign from malignant clusters. Experiments were performed on 1715 cases (882 benign and 833 malignant) extracted from the Digital Database of Screening Mammography, which is the largest publicly available database of mammograms. The results of our study indicated that texture features outperformed the rest of the considered categories, while the combination of the best features optimized the classification results, leading to an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve equal to 0.82.

[1]  Antonis Frigas,et al.  “Hippocrates-mst”: a prototype for computer-aided microcalcification analysis and risk assessment for breast cancer , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[2]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Current status and future directions of computer-aided diagnosis in mammography , 2007, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[3]  Richard H. Moore,et al.  THE DIGITAL DATABASE FOR SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY , 2007 .

[4]  Sejong Yoon,et al.  Mutual information-based SVM-RFE for diagnostic classification of digitized mammograms , 2009, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[5]  K. Doi,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for histological classification of clustered microcalcifications on magnification mammograms. , 2004, Medical physics.

[6]  Jason Weston,et al.  Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2002, Machine Learning.

[7]  Brijesh Verma,et al.  Classification of benign and malignant patterns in digital mammograms for the diagnosis of breast cancer , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  M. Giger,et al.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM. , 2008, Medical physics.

[9]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces. , 1998, Medical physics.

[10]  Li Chen,et al.  Computerized analysis of tissue density effect on missed cancer detection in digital mammography , 2006, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[11]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Usefulness of Texture Analysis for Computerized Classification of Breast Lesions on Mammograms , 2007, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[12]  L. Costaridou,et al.  Texture analysis of tissue surrounding microcalcifications on mammograms for breast cancer diagnosis. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  Kwan-Hoong Ng,et al.  Advances in Mammography Have Improved Early Detection of Breast Cancer , 2003 .

[14]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[15]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis in Mammography , 2005 .

[16]  Dimitrios I. Fotiadis,et al.  Characterization of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms using neural networks and support vector machines , 2005, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[17]  I. Andreadis,et al.  Investigating the image features landscape for the classification of breast microcalcifications , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques.

[18]  M Lanyi Microcalcifications in the breast--a blessing or a curse? A critical review. , 1985, Diagnostic imaging in clinical medicine.

[19]  Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh,et al.  Comparison of multiwavelet, wavelet, Haralick, and shape features for microcalcification classification in mammograms , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[20]  N Roberts,et al.  Segmentation and numerical analysis of microcalcifications on mammograms using mathematical morphology. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[21]  Marios A. Gavrielides,et al.  Computer-aided classification of breast microcalcification clusters: merging of features from image processing and radiologists , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[22]  M. Elter,et al.  CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review. , 2009, Medical physics.

[23]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated classification of clustered microcalcifications into malignant and benign types. , 2000, Medical physics.

[24]  Christopher J. C. Burges,et al.  A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition , 1998, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[25]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[26]  J. C. Fu,et al.  Image segmentation feature selection and pattern classification for mammographic microcalcifications. , 2005, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.