Advanced Computing for Social Change: Educating and Engaging Our Students to Compete in a Changing Workforce

Visualization taps into the very best capabilities of our brains, transforming data that is fundamentally abstract as numbers into something that communicates and illuminates information ranging from the simple to the complex. There is a growing interdependence amongst society, humanity, technology and science. Simultaneously, interdisciplinary science has taken a critical role in understanding and solving what has become a multi-faceted realm of large, complex problems. This is contrasted by a looming global workforce shortage in those educated in computational science. In response, we have developed a new model for engaging students, the advanced computing for social change initiative, teaching computational skills in the context of relevant social issues. This paper provides rationale for our inaugural challenge, including evaluation data and recommendations1.

[1]  J. Hartley,et al.  Note‐taking: A critical review , 1978 .

[2]  W. Heath.  The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies , 2008 .

[3]  Chet Meyers,et al.  Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom , 1993 .

[4]  M. Silberman.  Active Learning: 101 Strategies To Teach Any Subject. , 1996 .

[5]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[6]  Geoffrey Caine,et al.  12 Brain/Mind Learning Principles in Action: The Fieldbook for Making Connections, Teaching, and the Human Brain , 2004 .

[7]  J. Launchbury,et al.  THE FEDERAL BIG DATA RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN , 2016 .

[8]  Charlene P. E. Burns,et al.  Cognitive Dissonance Theory and the Induced-Compliance Paradigm: Concerns for Teaching Religious Studies. , 2006 .

[9]  G. Stenberg,et al.  Conceptual and perceptual factors in the picture superiority effect , 2006 .

[10]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Social Brain Hypothesis , 1998, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[11]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  A comparison of conscious and automatic memory processes for picture and word stimuli: A process dissociation analysis , 2002, Consciousness and Cognition.

[12]  N. DiTomaso,et al.  Capitalizing on Thought Diversity for Innovation , 2009 .

[13]  Pamela R. Cangelosi,et al.  Teaching Through Storytelling: An Exemplar , 2006, International journal of nursing education scholarship.

[14]  Tor Endestad,et al.  Memory for Pictures and Words following Literal and Metaphorical Decisions , 2003 .

[15]  Antonelli Cristiano,et al.  The Foundations of the Economics of Innovation , 2007 .

[16]  J. Buhle,et al.  Typologies of attentional networks , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.