A non-compensatory composite indicator approach to assessing low-carbon performance

Abstract Low-carbon development has been widely regarded as a key strategy for tackling the challenges posed by climate change. Measuring low-carbon performance can provide policy makers valuable information for monitoring the progress of low-carbon development in an economy such as a city. Composite indicator, owing to its transparency and ease of communication to the public, has been touted as a useful analytical tool for measuring low-carbon performance. The construction of composite indicators often takes the compensability assumption which allows the full substitutability between underlying indicators. In this paper, we argue that the compensability assumption needs to be restricted in assessing low-carbon performance. A non-compensatory approach based on the outranking relation is used to construct composite low-carbon performance indicator. A more efficient heuristic procedure is proposed to handle the computational complexity in deriving the final comprehensive rankings. The approach has been applied to assess the city-level low-carbon performance in China. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to investigate the impacts of various parameters on the modeling results.

[1]  W. Cook,et al.  On the Minimum Violations Ranking of a Tournament , 1986 .

[2]  Carmelo Maria Torre,et al.  Non-compensatory composite indicators for the evaluation of urban planning policy: The Land-Use Policy Efficiency Index (LUPEI) , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Elisa Fusco,et al.  Enhancing non-compensatory composite indicators: A directional proposal , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Nicky Rogge,et al.  Geometric composite indicators with compromise Benefit-of-the-Doubt weights , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  José Rui Figueira,et al.  Dealing with a multiple criteria environmental problem with interaction effects between criteria through an extension of the Electre III method , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  S. Dhakal Urban energy use and carbon emissions from cities in China and policy implications , 2009 .

[7]  Biresh K. Sahoo,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity in composite indicator: A methodological proposal , 2017, Omega.

[8]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  A multicriteria approach to country risk evaluation: With an example employing Japanese data , 1993 .

[9]  Jacinto González-Pachón,et al.  Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  R. Luce Semiorders and a Theory of Utility Discrimination , 1956 .

[11]  Chris Tofallis,et al.  On constructing a composite indicator with multiplicative aggregation and the avoidance of zero weights in DEA , 2014, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[12]  Li Yu,et al.  Low carbon eco-city: new approach for Chinese urbanisation , 2014 .

[13]  Wiktor L. Adamowicz,et al.  Modeling non-compensatory preferences in environmental valuation , 2015 .

[14]  William Becker,et al.  Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap , 2017, Ecological indicators.

[15]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Weighting and Aggregation in Composite Indicator Construction: a Multiplicative Optimization Approach , 2010 .

[16]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Measuring human development via data envelopment analysis: the case of Asia and the Pacific , 2005 .

[17]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Measuring the Immeasurable: A Survey of Sustainability Indices , 2007 .

[18]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Comparing aggregating methods for constructing the composite environmental index: An objective measure , 2006 .

[19]  Creating an acceptable consensus ranking for group decision making , 2018, J. Comb. Optim..

[20]  D. Fridley,et al.  Development of a low-carbon indicator system for China , 2013 .

[21]  Peng Zhou,et al.  Constructing meaningful environmental indices: A nonparametric frontier approach , 2017 .

[22]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .

[23]  Nardo Michela,et al.  Constructing Consistent Composite Indicators: the Issue of Weights , 2005 .

[24]  Chris Tofallis,et al.  An automatic-democratic approach to weight setting for the new human development index , 2012 .

[25]  D. Fridley,et al.  ELITE cities: A low-carbon eco-city evaluation tool for China , 2015 .

[26]  H. Welsch,et al.  Meaningful environmental indices: a social choice approach , 2004 .

[27]  S. Goddard Ranking in Tournaments and Group Decisionmaking , 1983 .

[28]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  A Case Study of a Non-Compensatory Approach to Ranking Transportation Projects , 1988 .

[29]  Nathan Pollesch,et al.  Applications of aggregation theory to sustainability assessment , 2015 .

[30]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change , 2014 .

[31]  Hui Wang,et al.  Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: A non-radial directional distance function approach , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Jin Yang,et al.  A holistic low carbon city indicator framework for sustainable development , 2017 .

[33]  S. Seth Bordner,et al.  ‘All-things-considered,’ ‘Better-than,’ And Sports Rankings , 2016 .

[34]  Rafael Caballero,et al.  Goal programming synthetic indicators: An application for sustainable tourism in Andalusian coastal counties , 2010 .

[35]  C. Romero,et al.  In search of a natural systems sustainability index , 2004 .

[36]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Monitoring changes in economy-wide energy efficiency: From energy-GDP ratio to composite efficiency index , 2006 .

[37]  Ana S. Camanho,et al.  Undesirable outputs and weighting schemes in composite indicators based on data envelopment analysis , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  José Rui Figueira,et al.  Discriminating thresholds as a tool to cope with imperfect knowledge in multiple criteria decision aiding: Theoretical results and practical issues , 2014 .

[39]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators , 2007 .

[40]  K. Mori,et al.  Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI) , 2012 .

[41]  Nicky Rogge,et al.  On aggregating Benefit of the Doubt composite indicators , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  B. Roy THE OUTRANKING APPROACH AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF ELECTRE METHODS , 1991 .

[43]  Francesco Vidoli,et al.  Non-compensability in Composite Indicators: A Robust Directional Frontier Method , 2015 .

[44]  Gregory M Peters,et al.  Aggregating sustainability indicators: beyond the weighted sum. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[45]  Tom Van Puyenbroeck,et al.  Geometric mean quantity index numbers with Benefit-of-the-Doubt weights , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[46]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Noncompensatory/nonlinear composite indicators for ranking countries: a defensible setting , 2009 .

[47]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..