An evaluation of the quality of epilepsy education on the Canadian World Wide Web

BACKGROUND Despite the substantial amount of epilepsy-related information available on the Internet, little is known about its quality. Epilepsy-related information in English on the Canadian Internet was reviewed. METHODS Popular search engines (google.ca, yahoo.ca, ca.altavista.com, simpatico.msn.ca) were interrogated. Web sites aimed primarily at patient and family education, geared toward human epilepsy, and epilepsy in general as opposed to one specific type or aspect of epilepsy, were included. Web sites were then subdivided in to proprietary (directly sponsored by the industry) and nonproprietary, and evaluated according to compliance with the principles of the Health on the Net (HON) Foundation Code of Conduct. Web sites without comprehensive contents were excluded. Comparison between total scores was done using the rank test. Categorized descriptors were assessed with t tests. RESULTS Five proprietary and fourteen nonproprietary websites were identified. None of them were compliant with all eight principles of the HON code. The average number of principles with which these sites were in compliance was 3.3 (range: 1-6.5, P = 0.4, proprietary vs nonproprietary). CONCLUSIONS The Internet has the potential to be a very powerful educational tool for patients with epilepsy. However, most of the easily accessed epilepsy web sites do not comply with accepted standards for health web sites.

[1]  J. Girvin,et al.  Health‐related quality of life and seizure control in temporal lobe epilepsy , 1997, Annals of neurology.

[2]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  Accessibility of information on the web , 1999, Nature.

[3]  J. Hartshorn,et al.  Impact of epilepsy on quality of life. , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses.

[4]  P. Impicciatore,et al.  Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home , 1997, BMJ.

[5]  J. Powell,et al.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[6]  Christian Köhler,et al.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Maria Alenita de Oliveira,et al.  Evaluation of an educational program for asthma control in adults. , 1997, The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma.

[8]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. , 2001, JAMA.

[9]  Samuel Wiebe,et al.  National and Regional Prevalence of Self‐reported Epilepsy in Canada , 2004, Epilepsia.

[10]  D. Gustafson,et al.  Impact of a patient-centered, computer-based health information/support system. , 1999, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  Alejandro R Jadad,et al.  Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  M. Peterson,et al.  An evaluation of the quality and contents of asthma education on the World Wide Web. , 2002, Chest.

[13]  J. Allison,et al.  Users of Internet Health Information: Differences by Health Status , 2002, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  S. Ziebland,et al.  How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  Elizabeth Murray,et al.  The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. Physicians , 2003, Journal of medical Internet research.